「coverage」の検索結果

Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up metrics, logs, and traces for a service. Use when a mid-level developer needs basic observability coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

影视编剧 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting) — 为电影 / 电视 / 流媒体剧集写戏剧蓝本的从业者认知操作系统: 决定「讲什么故事、人物是谁为何转变、场景如何被戏剧化、主题为何重要」的学科 —— 区别于导演 (调度 / 视觉实现)、制片 (融资 / 排期)、小说 (无格式 / 场景 / 视觉动作约束)。覆盖 (a) 故事与结构理论 (亚里士多德《诗学》情节 / 人物 / 思想 + 突转 peripeteia / 发现 anagnorisis + 净化 catharsis; Syd Field 范式 / 三幕 / 情节点; Freytag 金字塔; Egri 前提; McKee《故事》掌控性理念 / 鸿沟 / 价值正负转变 / 激励事件 / 渐进式复杂化; Truby《故事剖析》22 步 + 道德论证; Vogler/Campbell 英雄之旅; Blake Snyder《救猫咪》15 拍节拍表; Dan Harmon 故事环; John Yorke 五幕《进入森林》; Frank Daniel 八序列法; 起承转合东亚戏剧结构), (b) 人物 (想要 vs 需要 / 外在目标 vs 内在缺失, 人物弧光 正 / 负 / 平, flaw-wound-ghost 创伤背景, 主动 vs 被动主角的能动性, Egri 三维人物 生理 / 社会 / 心理, 反派是主角的镜子, 群像与关系网, 人物在压力下的选择中显形), (c) 对白 (潜台词 subtext, 对白即动作与冲突而非信息, 避免太直白 on the nose, 人物独特声口, 信息植入 exposition, Mamet/Sorkin 意图-阻碍式对白, 展示而非告知, 中文剧台词工艺), (d) 场景与序列工艺 (场景是有目标 / 冲突 / 转折的微型故事, 场景价值充能与转折点, 晚进早出, 八序列法, set piece, 转场, 场景头 / 动作行 / 括号提示 格式工艺), (e) 主题与前提 (掌控性理念 / 前提, 主题是被戏剧化的论证而非说教, 道德论证 Truby, 主题统一性, 这到底在讲什么), (f) 类型 (类型惯例是对观众的承诺, Snyder 10 类故事, 颠覆 vs 尊重套路, 类型片 vs 文艺片, 中国类型 主旋律 / 古装 / 年代 / 悬疑 / 甜宠 / 都市 / 军旅 / 历史正剧), (g) 格式与工业流程 (好莱坞剧本格式与 Final Draft, logline 一句话故事, treatment 故事大纲, 节拍表, 分场 / 分集大纲, spec 原创剧本 vs 委托, pitch, coverage, 美剧编剧室与 showrunner 制; 中国 大纲→人物小传→分集大纲→剧本, 长剧集 40 集结构, 网络电影 / 网大, 分账剧, 平台定制剧, 微短剧竖屏短剧), (h) 改稿与开发 (写作就是改写, 改稿 / 润色 / 推倒重写, 处理意见 / 改稿意见, 片方与平台 notes, 杀死你的宝贝, 围读, 开发地狱), (i) 改编 (IP改编 小说 / 漫画 / 游戏改编, 忠于精神而非字句, 压缩, 中国网文 IP 热), (j) 中国影视编剧产业现实 (审查 / 广电总局约束, 备案 / 立项, 平台定制剧 爱优腾芒, 分账, 编剧维权 署名权 / 欠薪 / 枪手, 注水剧, 流量 + 大IP 资本逻辑 vs 原创工艺, 导演中心制 vs 编剧话语权), (k) 编剧职业与工艺生涯 (spec vs 委托, 编剧 vs 编审 / 策划, 单兵 vs 编剧室, 在开发链条中的位置, WGA 与署名仲裁规范, 入行, 中国编剧地位与权益)。跨 电影 / 美剧流媒体 / 中国电影与长剧集。不含 导演 / 摄影 / 制片 / 融资 / 表演 / 电影理论批评为终点 / 泛小说写作 / 纪录片 / 新闻 —— 本 skill 是「戏剧化编剧」工艺: 故事 / 人物 / 场景 / 对白 / 主题 / 结构 / 格式 与围绕它们的产业流程。 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting for film & TV (影视编剧) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who write the dramatic blueprint of films, television, and streaming series: the discipline of deciding WHAT story is told, WHO the characters are and why they change, HOW the scenes are dramatized, and WHY it matters thematically — distinct from directing (staging/visual realization), producing (financing/scheduling), and prose fiction (which has no format/scene/visual-action constraints). Covers (a) story & structure theory (Aristotle's Poetics — plot/character/thought + reversal peripeteia/recognition anagnorisis + catharsis; Syd Field's paradigm/three-act/plot points; Freytag's pyramid; Lajos Egri's premise; Robert McKee's Story — controlling idea/the gap/value charge/inciting incident/progressive complications; John Truby's 22 steps & moral argument; Christopher Vogler/Joseph Campbell hero's journey; Blake Snyder's Save the Cat 15-beat sheet; Dan Harmon's story circle; John Yorke's 5-act Into the Woods; Frank Daniel's 8-sequence method; 起承转合 East-Asian dramatic structure), (b) character (want vs need/external goal vs internal lack, character arc positive/negative/flat, 人物弧光, flaw-wound-ghost backstory, agency active vs passive protagonist, Egri's 3-dimensional character physiology/sociology/psychology, antagonist as the protagonist's mirror, ensemble & relationship webs, character revealed through choice under pressure), (c) dialogue (subtext 潜台词, dialogue as action & conflict not information, 'on the nose' avoidance, distinct character voice, exposition handling, Mamet/Sorkin intention-obstacle dialogue, show-don't-tell, 台词 craft in Chinese drama), (d) scene & sequence craft (scene as a mini-story with goal/conflict/turn, scene value charge & turning point, enter-late-leave-early, the 8-sequence method, set pieces, transitions, slug line/action line/parenthetical format craft), (e) theme & premise (controlling idea/premise/前提, theme as dramatized argument not message, moral argument Truby, thematic unity, 'what is this really about'), (f) genre (genre conventions as audience promise, Snyder's 10 story types, subverting vs honoring tropes, 类型片 vs 文艺片, Chinese genres 主旋律/古装/年代/悬疑/甜宠/都市/军旅/历史正剧), (g) format & industry process (Holly

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

半导体芯片制造工艺 (Semiconductor Process Engineering / 半导体芯片制造工艺 — 以「物理化学极限 + 良率经济双重约束」为特征的集成电路前道/后道制造工艺认知操作系统：从「器件架构与微缩路线（planar→FinFET→GAA nanosheet→CFET、等效微缩 DTCO/STCO、背面供电 BSPDN）→ 工艺整合（FEOL/MOL/BEOL 模块协同、PDK、流片 tape-out）→ 单元工艺（光刻 litho（DUV 浸没式 193i / EUV 13.5nm / 多重曝光 SADP-SAQP / OPC / mask）、刻蚀 etch（RIE/ICP/原子层刻蚀 ALE）、薄膜沉积 depo（CVD/PECVD/LPCVD/ALD/PVD/外延 epi/电镀 Cu）、掺杂 doping（离子注入 ion implant / 退火 RTA-laser anneal）、CMP 化学机械抛光、清洗 cleaning）→ 量测检测 metrology（CD-SEM / OCD / overlay / 椭偏 ellipsometry / 缺陷检测 defect inspection / e-beam）→ 良率工程 yield（缺陷密度 / SPC 统计过程控制 / FDC / APC / DOE 实验设计 / 良率爬坡 yield ramp）→ 先进封装 advanced packaging（2.5D/3D、CoWoS、HBM、混合键合 hybrid bonding、chiplet、TSV）」的完整器件-工艺-良率-量产决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **物理/化学/材料的硬约束（量子隧穿、短沟道效应、RC 延迟、热预算、缺陷物理、ppb 级污染控制）⇄ 良率/成本/产能的经济约束（每片晶圆成本、良率是主经济指标、D0 缺陷密度、wafer-per-hour、折旧）**；**持续微缩/摩尔定律（dimensional + equivalent scaling、节点路线图 N5/N3/N2/A16/A14、high-NA EUV）⇄ 物理极限/微缩放缓（原子尺度、漏电、功耗墙、成本墙、'摩尔定律已死'之争）**；**协同优化/整合（DTCO 设计-工艺协同、STCO 系统-工艺协同、模块间 trade-off）⇄ 单模块极致优化（单一 unit process 工艺窗口）**；**工艺配方的 tacit 手艺（process recipe 调试、工艺窗口、缺陷根因分析、量产 ramp 的经验）⇄ 可建模/可仿真/数据驱动（TCAD 仿真、ML 良率分析、APC/FDC、数字孪生）**；**性能-功耗-面积-成本 PPAC 四角权衡 ⇄ 良率/可制造性 DFM 优先**；**自主可控/国产替代（卡脖子、EUV 出口管制、设备/材料/EDA 国产化、SMIC/长江存储/长鑫/中微/北方华创/上海微电子）⇄ 全球高度分工（ASML 光刻垄断、AMAT/Lam/TEL/KLA 设备、TSMC/Samsung/Intel 代工、全球供应链）**。(b) 核心工作流 / pipeline（最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化）— 新节点/新工艺导入：器件目标与 PPAC 定义 → 工艺整合方案与 PDK → 单元工艺开发与配方调试（DOE 找工艺窗口）→ 量测建立与 SPC → 良率爬坡（缺陷分类 + 根因分析 + 工艺改善）→ 量产移交与持续改善。具体单元工艺 SOP：光刻（曝光条件 / OPC / overlay 控制 / 多重曝光分解）、刻蚀（选择比 / profile / loading effect / ALE）、沉积（台阶覆盖 / 应力 / 均匀性）、CMP（去除速率 / 碟形 dishing / 侵蚀 erosion）、量测与缺陷分析、良率分析与 FA 失效分析。(c) 工具栈 — 设备（光刻 ASML/上海微电子 SMEE；刻蚀+沉积 AMAT/Lam/TEL/中微 AMEC/北方华创 Naura；离子注入 AMAT/Axcelis；CMP AMAT/荏原 Ebara；量测检测 KLA/AMAT/中科飞测/上海精测）、EDA/TCAD/仿真（Synopsys Sentaurus/Silvaco/Coventor SEMulator3D、OPC Calibre/Synopsys）、良率与制造软件（SPC、MES、FDC/APC、缺陷分析 yield management、PWS）、材料（光刻胶 photoresist、CMP 浆料 slurry、特气、靶材、掩膜 mask blank）。(d) 知识正典 — 半导体工艺 canon 横跨器件物理与制造工程：核心教材（Plummer/Deal/Griffin《Silicon VLSI Technology》、Sze《Physics of Semiconductor Devices》《VLSI Technology》、Wolf & Tauber《Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era》、Campbell《Fabrication Engineering at the Micro and Nanoscale》、May & Spanos《Fundamentals of Semiconductor Manufacturing and Process Control》、Quirk & Serda《Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology》、肖国勇/施敏中文教材）、路线图（ITRS/IRDS、IEEE 国际器件与系统路线图）、顶会论文（IEDM、Symposium on VLSI Technology、IRPS 可靠性、SPIE Advanced Lithography、ISSCC、DAC）、行业分析（SemiAnalysis、TechInsights、IC Knowledge）。(e) figures/流派 — 学术与器件奠基（Gordon Moore 摩尔、Robert Dennard 登纳德微缩、胡正明 Chenming Hu FinFET/UTB-SOI 发明人 UC Berkeley、刘明 Tsu-Jae King Liu Berkeley、Krishna Saraswat Stanford、Mark Bohr Intel 工艺架构）、产业领袖与工艺大师（张忠谋 Morris Chang TSMC、林本坚 Burn-Jeng Lin 浸没式光刻、Martin van den Brink ASML、米玉杰/梁孟松 SMIC/三星工艺、Mark Liu/魏哲家 TSMC）、行业分析师（Dylan Patel SemiAnalysis、Scotten Jones IC Knowledge、TechInsights 拆解、Handel Jones）、科普与拆解（Asianometry、The Chip Letter、半导体行业观察）。流派分歧：等效微缩派 vs 摩尔定律已死派、前道微缩 vs 先进封装 chiplet 异构集成、dimensional scaling vs DTCO 协同优化、IDM vs 纯代工 foundry 模式、自主可控/国产替代路线 vs 全球分工。(f) 行业话术/黑话 — 制程节点 node / 流片 tape-out / 工艺窗口 process window / 良率 yield / 缺陷密度 D0 / 关键尺寸 CD / 套刻 overlay / 掩膜 reticle-mask / 光刻胶 PR / 浸没式 immersion / EUV/DUV / 多重曝光 multi-patterning SADP-SAQP / OPC / 刻蚀选择比 selectivity / profile / loading effect / 原子层刻蚀 ALE / 台阶覆盖 step coverage / 外延 epi / 离子注入 implant / 退火 anneal / RTA / CMP / dishing-erosion / FEOL-MOL-BEOL / FinFET / GAA / 纳米片 nanosheet / CFET / 背面供电 BSPDN / high-NA / PPAC / DTCO-STCO / DFM / SPC / FDC-APC / DOE / WAT-PCM / 良率爬坡 yield ramp / FA 失效分析 / particle 颗粒 / 洁净室 cleanroom-级别 / 12寸-8寸 wafer / chiplet / CoWoS / HBM / 混合键合 hybrid bonding / TSV / PDK / 等效微缩. (g) 争议/批判 — 「摩尔定律是否已死 vs 等效微缩继续」、「节点命名营销化（N3/N2 ≠ 物理 3nm/2nm，gate pitch/metal pitch 才是真尺度）」、「前道微缩 vs 先进封装异构集成谁是未来」、「自主可控/国产替代的现实（EUV 卡脖子、设备/材料/EDA 国产化进度、出口管制 entity list、良率与成熟度差距）」、「良率/成本/性能三角权衡」、「人才稀缺与工艺 know-how 的 tacit 性」、「中国大基金/产能扩张是否过剩」、「制裁与技术封锁」。(h) 大量隐性工艺手艺（process recipe 调试与工艺窗口寻找、缺陷根因分析与 FA、量产良率爬坡的经验判

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks for TDD or a tests-first workflow, or when developing a new feature with a test coverage requirement. Provides a structured red-green-refactor workflow with unit, integration, and E2E test guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract keywords from documents using YAKE algorithm with support for 34 languages (Arabic to Chinese). Use when users request keyword extraction, key terms, topic identification, content summarization, or document analysis. Includes domain-specific stopwords for AI/ML and life sciences. Optional deeper extraction mode (n=2+n=3 combined) for comprehensive coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the active host install, package, command ownership, enforcement, wrapper self-test, and active-dispatch coverage gap. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The test-first gate. Routed to by /feature (after the spec is approved), /fix, and /refactor before any implementation code is written. Six gated phases — obligation scan, red, green, obligation verify, coverage, lint. No feature code exists before Phase 1 clears; nothing reaches commit-gate until all six are green.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The spec-to-plan bridge. /feature supplies an approved spec; initial full-lane HTML sprint review may supply a ready draft only through draft_for_pair. Creates the same-format plan with exact paths, tests, dependencies and complete criterion coverage. The initial paired review has no execution authority until one real user reply approves both artifacts. Ordinary sequential planning retains approved-source binding and plan approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants crawl coverage, platform detection, dataLayer discovery, or a fresh artifact directory before grouping and schema work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profound LLM citation tracker (extension). Time-series brand citation rates across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other LLMs. Pairs with seo-seranking for triangulated AI visibility coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit design token usage across a product for consistency and coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or deciding what to test in this CLI

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs evidence-aware, multi-provider research with the Librarium v2 CLI. Use for deep research, competitive research, answer-engine visibility checks, or questions needing grounded multi-source coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test suite, assessing whether existing tests are worth anything, adding tests to a legacy codebase, or when the user mentions test coverage, test strategy, or weak tests. Not for reviewing a branch for bugs, and not for fixing the bugs it logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking code against a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure pre-commit hooks and lean GitHub Actions for shift-left quality assurance. Use when adding or auditing CI/CD to maximize local test coverage and minimize CI cost. Skip for Terraform/K8s, deployment pipelines, or non-GitHub CI providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review or improve code — one skill, four modes: bug/security review (default), performance, clean-code audit, slop cleanup. Pass mode:review|perf|clean|cleanup or infer. Don't use for writing features or generating tests (use test-coverage).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI combined code review and ship grade in one pass: findings with file:line evidence plus an A-F lane grade, Instant-F security triggers, OWASP checks, a deploy-safety gate, and fix briefs. Use when asked to review this, grade this, security-check this, is this safe to ship, or check this PR before merge: whenever the caller wants both what is wrong and whether it ships. Runs only when explicitly invoked; never auto-fires on a diff, save, or commit. NOT FOR: findings only with accessibility and SEO lanes (use suede-code-review); the letter grade alone (use suede-code-grader); making CI enforce the verdict on merge (use suede-ci-gate); LLM, RAG, or agent behavior coverage (use suede-ai-eval).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。