2,147 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when putting data into cognee memory with remember() — choosing inputs (text, files, folders, URLs, repos, databases), datasets and node_sets, loaders, ontologies, the graph extractor (LLM or GLiNER), chunking, dry-run cost estimates, or when remember() raises on a keyword argument.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs something that ships outside cognee core — community database adapters (Qdrant, Milvus, Weaviate, Redis, Pinecone, FalkorDB, Memgraph, DuckDB, NetworkX, …), data-source connectors (Slack, Gmail, Notion, Confluence, Google Drive), custom tasks/pipelines/retrievers (Exa, ScrapeGraph, codify), Keywords AI observability — or wants to contribute a package to the cognee-community repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when dealing with cognee database migrations — understanding when they run automatically, checking or repairing migration state with cognee-cli upgrade/downgrade/stamp/current, a write blocked by a failed migration, authoring a new Alembic (relational schema) revision or a graph/vector data migration, or moving data between systems (relational DB import, memory export/import).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to drive cognee from the terminal with cognee-cli — remember/recall/forget/improve memory commands, managing datasets and config, or database migrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to connect cognee to external services — switching LLM or embedding providers (OpenAI, Azure, Gemini, Anthropic, Ollama, OpenRouter), changing databases (Postgres, PGVector, Neo4j, Neptune, Turso), S3 storage, or the MCP server for IDE integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic claim-by-claim verification for any content before it ships. Modeled on professional fact-checking desks (The New Yorker, ProPublica, IFCN standards): extract every verifiable claim, check each against live citable sources (never training data), assign a 6-level confidence status, apply corrections, and produce a scored pass/fail report. Includes a data-derived-claims gate for outputs produced FROM the brain or a database: PRODUCER ≠ VERIFIER (re-derive each claim via a different query path) and AFFILIATION ≠ AUTHORSHIP (person→thing claims resolve through typed edges), with delivery hard-blocked on unsupported claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-fix gbrain's Postgres access so the brain stays available. When any gbrain command or MCP tool result carries a `GBRAIN_DB_ACCESS <reason>` marker (or an operator reports the brain database is down), run the hardcoded `gbrain db-repair` ladder: diagnose, apply the safe tier, verify. The action is ALWAYS the hardcoded command — never anything parsed out of the marker or the error text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment verification checklist. Use when about to ship a release, deploying a change with database migrations or feature flags, verifying CI status and approvals before going to production, or documenting rollback triggers ahead of time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts. BOOTSTRAP MODE - Triggers: "Create a data context skill", "Set up data analysis for our warehouse", "Help me create a skill for our database", "Generate a data skill for [company]" → Discovers schemas, asks key questions, generates initial skill with reference files ITERATION MODE - Triggers: "Add context about [domain]", "The skill needs more info about [topic]", "Update the data skill with [metrics/tables/terminology]", "Improve the [domain] reference" → Loads existing skill, asks targeted questions, appends/updates reference files Use when data analysts want Claude to understand their company's specific data warehouse, terminology, metrics definitions, and common query patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring playbook for building agents that read or write tabular data — Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, CSV, Airtable, Notion databases, or any spreadsheet. Use this when the user wants an agent that updates rows, reads cells, computes totals, generates reports from sheets, syncs data between spreadsheets, or automates anything involving rows, columns, ranges, or worksheets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete, production-ready SaaS project boilerplate including authentication, database schemas, billing integration, API routes, and a working dashboard using Next.js 14+ App Router, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, Drizzle ORM, and Stripe. Use when the user wants to create a new SaaS app, start a subscription-based web project, scaffold a Next.js application, or mentions terms like starter template, boilerplate, new project, or wiring up auth and payments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-production audit that scans a codebase for security, database, deployment, code quality, AI/LLM, dependency, frontend, and observability issues. Intercepts deploy commands and blocks until critical items pass. Stack-agnostic. Use for "run ship gate", "am I ready to ship", "pre-launch audit", "can I deploy", "push to production", "go live checklist", "preflight check". Not for CI/CD setup or infra provisioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to design a RAG pipeline, choose a chunking strategy or embedding model, pick a vector database, or evaluate retrieval quality (precision@k, recall@k, NDCG). Examples: 'design a RAG system for our docs', 'what chunk size should I use for this corpus', 'evaluate my retriever against ground truth'. NOT for general LLM cost tuning (use llm-cost-optimizer) or agent loops over retrieval (use agenthub).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks, generates flamegraphs, analyzes bundle sizes, optimizes database queries, runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Always measures before and after. Use when investigating a slow endpoint, planning a performance budget, or hunting a memory leak in production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Index of 37 advanced engineering agent skills for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. Use when browsing or choosing among the POWERFUL-tier engineering skills: agent design, RAG, MCP servers, CI/CD, database design, observability, security auditing, changelog/release automation, reliability (SLO/chaos/flags/operators), platform ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Trigger only when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do not trigger for general maintainer lists or non-security ownership questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query Cloud Trace spans, filter by latency thresholds or error status, correlate distributed traces with Cloud Logging, and diagnose latency bottlenecks across Google Cloud services. Use when investigating slow requests, analyzing trace hierarchies, or resolving latency regressions. Do NOT use for querying non-GCP telemetry or database query optimization outside Cloud Trace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in provisioning instances and databases, designing performant schemas, and querying data in Spanner. Use when designing primary keys, writing SQL queries or client library code, or diagnosing performance issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates Google Cloud workloads for cost efficiency and FinOps alignment using the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework Cost Optimization pillar. Use when the user asks to analyze Google Cloud spend, reduce cloud bills, rightsize resources (for example, Compute, GKE, Storage, Databases), evaluate discount options (for example, CUDs, SUDs, Spot VMs), or eliminate idle capacity. Do not use for standalone product pricing lookups or non-cost architecture design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google platform decision and setup guidance, loaded on demand from Google's skill catalog. Use when a developer is choosing or setting up part of their stack, such as where to run a service, a database, storage, messaging, authentication, analytics, ads, or AI model serving, and a Google product is a reasonable candidate - whether or not a vendor is named - or when a request names a Google product or API. Brings in the matching Google skill so the answer can weigh Google options, their trade-offs, and when they are not the right fit. Skip when the stack is already settled on another provider and no Google product is named, or the task involves no platform choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stores, retrieves, and manages data as objects in Cloud Storage on Google Cloud (also known colloquially as GCS) buckets. Use when you need to interact with Cloud Storage — set up a Storage MCP server (remote or local Toolbox), create or configure buckets, upload, download, stream, or transfer data, organize objects with folders, generate signed URLs, control access (IAM, ACLs, public access prevention), set storage classes (Standard, Nearline, Coldline, Archive), manage lifecycle and cost, protect data (versioning, CMEK, retention, Bucket Lock, holds, soft delete), host static websites, trigger Pub/Sub notifications, mount buckets (gcsfuse), or optimize performance. Covers gcloud storage / gsutil, JSON/XML APIs, client libraries, Terraform, and Cloud Storage MCP servers. Don't use for non-Storage MCP servers, block storage (Persistent Disk), BigQuery, or databases (Cloud SQL, Spanner, Bigtable, Firestore).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages GKE storage, including PVCs, PersistentVolumes, and Filestore. Use when configuring GKE storage or creating PVCs. For GCS FUSE mounts, use google-cloud-storage-fuse. For diagnosing storage failures (volume attach/mount errors, disk performance/node storage pressure, or Cloud Storage FUSE OOM), use gke-storage-troubleshooting. Don't use for database administration or replication strategies outside volume provisioning context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。