「features」の検索結果

Facilitate a structured conversation to define requirement standards for a project — epic and feature definitions, scenario structure, AC format, priority notation, status workflow, and naming conventions. Produces a formal requirement-standards.md that the requirement-quality atom reads via config resolution, customising its embedded defaults for the team's product process. Use when setting up a new project, defining product standards, or when the user says 'set up requirement standards', 'define feature standards', 'configure requirement forge', 'define how features should be structured', or 'requirement forge refiner'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide structured design thinking through 5 progressive levels before any code is written. Levels: Capabilities, Components, Interactions, Contracts, Implementation. Use when building new features, refactoring significant code, designing modules, or when the user says 'design this', 'architect this', 'let's think before coding', 'walk me through the design', or 'whiteboard this'. For simple utilities enter at Level 4 (Contracts), for single-component tasks at Level 2 — see Complexity Calibration. Do not use for quick bug patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a complete design workflow -- from establishing context through four progressive design levels (Capabilities, Components, Interactions, Contracts) to an approved blueprint. Composes knowledge-priming, context-anchoring, learning-harvest, collaborative-judgment, design-first, architecture, and domain-driven-design into one process. Handles both new features (create context doc) and resuming existing work (load context doc). Level 5 (Implementation) is delegated to code-forge. Use when starting a design, planning architecture, or when the user says 'design a feature', 'blueprint', 'start designing', 'plan the architecture', or 'let's design before coding'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent production guidance for translating measured audio features into deterministic video timing and motion. Use for beat-, onset-, phrase-, energy-, silence-, or spectrum-reactive visualizers, edits, typography, and generated compositions; not for music-video concept direction, audio generation, or a runtime-specific recipe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Google search results, SERP features, and organic rankings through SandBase DataForSEO. Use when asked for SERP analysis, Google ranking research, search feature identification, or organic visibility assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze pricing information from competitor websites. Identifies pricing tiers, features per tier, billing models, and positioning relative to market alternatives. Ideal for competitive pricing strategy and market positioning research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps GWAS-implicated loci to candidate effector (causal) genes by integrating variant-to-gene (V2G) features via Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021), MAGMA gene-based association (de Leeuw 2015), FUMA SNP2GENE, cS2G combined SNP-to-gene scores (Gazal 2022), Polygenic Priority Scores (PoPS, Weeks 2023), FLAMES, INQUISIT, DEPICT, and enhancer-gene predictors (ABC, ENCODE-rE2G). Use when narrowing a GWAS lead locus to a candidate causal gene, picking between proximity, eQTL-based, and similarity-based prioritizers, integrating multi-evidence streams (fine-mapping, colocalization, ABC enhancer-gene, distance, chromatin), reconciling discordant L2G vs PoPS calls, prioritizing tissue-specific eQTL evidence, or triangulating across at least three independent lines of evidence for a publication-grade effector-gene nomination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the Ensembl REST API for gene/transcript/protein lookup, sequence retrieval, comparative genomics (Compara), variant effect prediction (VEP), regulatory features, and cross-species ortholog/paralog calls. Use when pulling Ensembl-native data (Ensembl Gene IDs, version-pinned releases, archive endpoints for reproducibility), gene/transcript/exon structure with stable IDs, or VEP for variant annotation. Encodes the 15 req/sec rate limit, archive (e110.rest.ensembl.org) for reproducibility, Ensembl divisions (vertebrates / plants / fungi / metazoa / bacteria), and the symbol-vs-ID stability problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes cfDNA fragment size distributions and fragmentomics features using FinaleToolkit or Griffin. Extracts nucleosome positioning patterns, fragment ratios, and DELFI-style fragmentation profiles for cancer detection. Use when leveraging fragment patterns for tumor detection or tissue-of-origin analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotate CLIP-seq peaks or crosslink sites to RNA features (5'UTR, CDS, 3'UTR, intron, splice junction, snoRNA, tRNA, ncRNA, repeat elements) with ChIPseeker, RCAS, RBP-Maps (Yeo splicing regulatory maps), and bedtools, applying feature-priority hierarchies, transcript-context resolution, and metagene aggregation. Use when characterizing where in transcripts an RBP binds, comparing peak distribution across regions, generating splicing-regulatory maps relative to alternative-splicing events, or distinguishing exonic vs intronic vs UTR binding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes time-to-event data using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression with lifelines. Builds survival models from clinical and omics features. Use when predicting patient survival or modeling time-to-event outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects informative features for biomarker discovery using Boruta all-relevant selection, mRMR minimum redundancy, and LASSO regularization. Use when identifying biomarkers from high-dimensional omics data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for predictive modeling, biomarker discovery, survival modeling, and explainability over omics-derived features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor pricing, features, changelogs, dashboards, and product changes with Firecrawl. Use for recurring competitive intelligence, pricing tier extraction, feature change tracking, or structured competitor alerts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting creative work (features, components, functionality, or behavior changes) to clarify user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing features or fixing bugs with strict Test-Driven Development (TDD). Activate for coding tasks that require new functionality, refactoring, or comprehensive test coverage, especially when the user mentions TDD or Test Driven Development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS interaction and picking - ScreenSpaceEventHandler, multi-key KeyboardEventModifier input actions, Scene.pick, Scene.drillPick, Scene.pickPosition, Scene.snap edge snapping (1.144), mouse and touch events. Use when handling user clicks on the globe, selecting entities or 3D Tiles features, registering modifier-key shortcuts, implementing hover effects, snapping to model edges for measurement, or building drag-based interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CustomShader authoring — vertexShaderText and fragmentShaderText against VertexInput, FragmentInput, FeatureIds, Metadata, czm_modelMaterial. Use when reading EXT_mesh_features or EXT_structural_metadata property textures/tables, vertex displacement, or shading VoxelPrimitive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS 3D Tiles - Cesium3DTileset, compressed and CAD-style glTF content, MVTDataProvider, UrlTemplate3DTilesDataProvider, styling, metadata, feature picking, voxels, point clouds, I3S, Gaussian splats, clipping. Use when a task involves loading 3D Tiles or Mapbox Vector Tiles, draping vector tiles on terrain, rendering KHR meshopt/CAD content, styling or querying features, working with voxels or point clouds, or clipping spatial data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。