「fixes」の検索結果

Audit and optimize a skill system with evidence. Use for skill architecture, token or context waste, role and prompt boundaries, routing hits or misfires, plugin packaging, registry/docs/source drift, duplicate workflows, or deciding whether a reusable change belongs in a skill. Runs deterministic checks first and applies only authorized, minimal fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack investigation method for bugs, incidents, failing tests, regressions, and unclear behavior where evidence and root cause should precede fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing quality guidelines, formatting conventions, and styling constraints for documentation. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or auditing documentation files, READMEs, markdown files, or guides. - Modifying files with suffixes like: *.md, *.qmd, *.txt, *.rst. - Prompt contains keywords: doc, documentation, spelling, grammar, headers, links, table alignment, Divio, tone, voice, clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility review for Vue surfaces — the code-cleaning analog of /code-review and /simplify, pointed at WCAG/ARIA. Reviews just your diff (or a package/file), rates findings by severity, and either comments inline on the PR (--comment) or applies the safe fixes for you (--fix). Steers the depth-aware `a11y` subagent. Use when asked to "check accessibility", "a11y this", "audit ARIA/keyboard", or run /a11y.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Front-end conventions review for Vue surfaces — the component-usage analog of /a11y, pointed at Nuxt UI 4 + crouton conventions instead of WCAG. Reviews just your diff (or a package/file) for v3 component names, the v4 overlay pattern, Options API, raw-HTML re-implementations, and hardcoded colors; rates findings by severity; and either comments inline on the PR (--comment) or applies the safe fixes for you (--fix). Steers the depth-aware `frontend-review` subagent. Use when asked to "check the frontend", "are we using Nuxt UI right", "review component usage", "frontend-review this", or run /frontend-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing UI code for interface-guideline compliance (accessibility, forms, animation, images, performance, UX copy) and/or validating a deployed page against Lighthouse 95+ targets. Produces evidence-based findings (file:line + Lighthouse JSON) and turns confirmed pendencies into Draft SPECs via write-specs. Do NOT use to design/build UI from scratch (use design) or to fix findings inline — fixes go through the SPEC pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for QA analysis, test planning, test cases, or root-cause analysis of a defect. Also use for post-merge PR review analysis: auditing recent closed PRs for Devin/GitHub/security bot comments, verifying whether requested corrections were applied, and turning pending fixes into SPECs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for bugs, test failures, broken behavior, or unexpected results; enforces 4-phase root-cause debugging before fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes UI performance across loading speed, rendering, animations, images, and bundle size. Use when the user mentions slow, laggy, janky, performance, bundle size, load time, or wants a faster, smoother experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes UI performance across loading speed, rendering, animations, images, and bundle size. Use when the user mentions slow, laggy, janky, performance, bundle size, load time, or wants a faster, smoother experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5] [--notify-channel -1002381931352]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the project's validation pipeline (lint → format → typecheck → unit tests) with auto-fixes, then optionally stage and write a Conventional Commit. Use before committing, when asked to "check", "validate", "run the workflow", or "get this commit-ready".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic repository health check — install, full validation, unused-code scan, outdated/vulnerable dependencies, and docs drift — ending in a concise report and, when there are safe fixes, a single PR. Designed to run unattended from a scheduled routine; also usable on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full dev cycle. Planning tier for clarify and plan; worker tier after approval for autonomous execution, tiered lint, thread rotation, and feedback fixes. Start every change here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roblox and Luau game code standards. Writes, reviews, and fixes Script, LocalScript, and ModuleScript code and game systems such as shops, DataStore saves, RemoteEvents, combat, NPCs, and UI. Use when a request involves Luau code or a Roblox Studio project, even when Roblox is never named, when a game bug is reported with no file named, and when the user asks to keep these standards active. Also covers Rojo, Argon, Azul, Script Sync, Studio MCP, and community libraries such as ProfileStore, Knit, Trove, and Fusion. Applies to requests written in any language. Not for plain Lua outside Roblox (Neovim, LOVE, Defold, other engines) or for game design with no Luau to write or review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a list of merged changes, closed work items or commit messages the user provides into DRAFT release notes under the version heading and date the user supplies, grouped as features, fixes and other, in the organisation's tone from the style guide or prior notes given, with every entry traced to its source item, breaking changes and required actions flagged first, and internal-only items held back for the release owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write the release notes for this version", "turn these merged pull requests into a changelog", "summarise what shipped this sprint for customers", "draft the what's new for this release" or "group these closed tickets into release notes". Do not use for an announcement email or intranet post about a launch, use announcement-drafter instead; for a change ticket, use change-request-pack; for a how-to article about one fix, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。