「oom」の検索結果

Review a built frontend against its chosen direction, catch drift back to generic AI defaults, enforce state coverage, ethical patterns, UX heuristics, and polish, and check contrast with APCA (not the legacy WCAG ratio). Produces specific, prioritized fixes — never vibes-based feedback. Works with pasted screenshots or Playwright MCP automated capture. Load when the user asks to review a UI, audit a design, check if a frontend looks generic or vibecoded, evaluate visual quality or polish, says "review this UI", "is this design good", "audit my frontend", "does this feel like [product]", "design QA", or when frontend-design routes here. Sub-skill of frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a chosen design direction into a canonical DESIGN.md plus production tokens that don't look vibecoded — state-level colors (8-step neutral ramp, rest/hover/active/ disabled, focus ring), APCA-checked contrast, typography, spacing/radius/motion/elevation, an icon strategy, and component contracts for the core atoms. Emits tokens in the project's stack format (shadcn HSL vars or Tailwind v4 @theme). Load when the user asks to build a design system, generate design tokens, create a DESIGN.md, set up a theme, design a color or type system, pick icons, or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-tokens-craft and icon-craft. Sub-skill of frontend-design. Reads DIRECTION.md first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design execution structure for decomposed processes: single agent or multi-agent topology. Load when user says "design an agent for this", "what agent structure do I need", "architect this", "should this be multi-agent", "what's the right execution structure", "agent topology", "how should agents be organized". Takes process-decomposer output as primary input. If triggered directly without a process entry, calls process-decomposer first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress an oversized SKILL.md to under 200 lines without losing effectiveness. Load when a skill exceeds 200 lines, when AGENTS.md triggers compression after a skill edit, or when the user asks to compress, shrink, slim down, or optimize a skill. Also triggers on "this skill is too long", "reduce skill size", "make this skill shorter". Applies to all skills including meta skills — the 200-line rule has no exceptions. Preserves hard gates, gotchas, output format, routing triggers, and at least one example. When genuinely CORE content cannot be compressed away, invokes split-skill instead of degrading the skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the eval-output skill suite — evaluate LLM and agent outputs for quality, accuracy, helpfulness, and safety using structured rubrics and LLM-as-judge techniques. Load when the user says "evaluate this output", "score this response", "run an eval", "LLM as judge", "evaluate agent output", "how good is this response", "rate this answer", "eval this", or provides an LLM output that should be assessed for quality. Single entry point for all output evaluation workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly understand an unfamiliar codebase or project by mapping its architecture, identifying key components and data flows, and surfacing complexity hotspots. Load when the user asks to understand a repo, explain how something works, map the architecture, onboard to a codebase, or explore how components connect. Also triggers on "walk me through this codebase", "how does this project work", "explain the architecture", "what does this repo do", "show me the structure", "onboard me", or any request to build a mental model of a codebase before making changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select alternative execution paths when a plan step fails — branch on outcomes instead of blind retry. Load when a structured plan step fails, an unexpected observation arrives, or the user asks what to try next after an error. Also triggers on "try another approach", "route around this failure", "replan on failure", "if X fails try Y", or outcome-based branching during multi-step work. Pairs with structured-planning and debug-and-fix. Does not replace root-cause debugging — adds plan-level path selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create focused role prompts for agents in multi-agent topologies. Load when agent-builder needs role prompts for agents, or when a user asks to "create an agent prompt", "write a role prompt", "define agent identity", "write an agent role", "prompt for this agent", "write instructions for this agent", "agent persona". Scope: agent role prompts only (v1). System prompts, task prompts, and skill invocation prompts are future TODOs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design automated evaluation pipelines for LLM and agent systems — combining deterministic checks, statistical metrics, and LLM-as-judge scoring into repeatable, CI-integrated eval suites. Load when the user asks to set up automated evals, design an eval pipeline, integrate evals into CI/CD, create an eval suite, do eval-driven development, or says "automate my evals", "CI eval integration", "evaluation pipeline", "continuous evaluation", "monitoring eval quality", "set up regression testing for my agent". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement CI/CD pipelines and automation — fast checks on every PR, safe releases, and repeatable workflows. Load when setting up GitHub Actions (or similar), adding pre-merge gates, automating releases, or the user asks "add CI", "set up workflows", "automate checks", "CD pipeline". Not for one-off local scripts (use task-specific tooling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right business-model canvas (Lean Canvas, Business Model Canvas, or Value Proposition Canvas) for the stage and fill it with specifics — one segment, one primary canvas, top-3 assumptions, no fluff in the moat or channel boxes. Load when the user asks to fill a business model canvas, lean canvas, value proposition canvas, model this business, map the business model, says "fill the BMC", "make a Lean Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas for this", "model this idea", "what's the business model", "design the business model". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "everyone" segments, generic channels ("SEO/social/content/ads"), and "unfair advantage = AI/data/network effects" with no concrete asset. Does NOT score viability — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the experimentation skill suite — turn assumptions and product questions into rigorous, well-instrumented experiments and decision-grade readouts. Routes through backlog → spec → runbook → readout based on user need and existing artefacts. Platform-agnostic with PostHog as the primary binding. Load when the user asks to design an experiment, A/B test something, set up an experiment, run a holdout, test a hypothesis, decide what to test next, read out experiment results, analyse a test, or says "should we A/B test this", "experiment on the landing page", "is this lift real", "ship or kill this test", "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "test the pricing page", "validate this with an experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate an approved experiment spec into a launch runbook — platform binding (PostHog primary), feature flag setup, assignment unit, exposure event definition, instrumentation QA, dashboard wiring, ramp plan, monitoring, and rollback procedure. Platform-agnostic core with one strong PostHog adapter shipped; GrowthBook, Statsig, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely, and Eppo documented as a single mapping table the user adapts. Load when a spec is approved and ready to launch, or when the user says "set up the experiment", "wire this up in PostHog", "implement the test", "create the runbook", "launch checklist for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test and debug browser UIs using Chrome DevTools MCP — DOM inspection, console errors, network requests, performance traces, and visual verification. Load when building or debugging anything that renders in a browser, verifying a UI fix, profiling Core Web Vitals in a real page, or the user asks for browser testing with DevTools. Requires chrome-devtools MCP configured. Not for backend-only or CLI work. Pairs with frontend-design and performance-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture the "why" behind technical choices to prevent architectural drift. Load when the user makes a major technical decision, chooses a library/framework, defines a system boundary, or changes a core architectural pattern. Also triggers on "record a decision", "write an ADR", "why did we do this", "document this architectural choice", or "architectural decision record". Supports `SYNTHESIS=true` mode for retrospective ADR backfill from observed repo state — used by `retroactive-project-setup` and any future backfill skill. Essential for long-term project maintainability and agent alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a rigorous, decision-grade experiment spec — falsifiable hypothesis, primary metric, guardrails, randomisation unit, exposure definition, method (A/B, holdout, switchback, quasi-experiment, MAB), MDE/duration plan, peek policy, validity threats, and pre-committed decision rule. Platform-agnostic. Load when the user has a candidate experiment and needs to spec it before launch, or says "spec this experiment", "write the test plan", "design this A/B test", "what's the hypothesis", "how big a sample do we need", "how long should we run this", "define the metrics for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user-facing or internal release notes and changelogs. Load when the user prepares a release, tags a version, or wants to summarize recent progress. Also triggers on "write a changelog", "prepare release notes", "what's new in this version", "summarize my commits", or "create a release summary". Auto-triggered by library-skill after major repo changes (new skills added, skills renamed, structure changes). Applicable to any project, including this skill library itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply validated research paper insights to the current project codebase — improving architecture, code patterns, testing strategies, documentation, or workflows based on empirical findings. Load when learn-from-paper routes insights to the current project, or when the user asks to apply paper findings to this project, improve this codebase with research, use this paper to improve my project, or apply research to my code. Also triggers on "apply this to my project", "how can this paper help my codebase", "use these findings here", "implement paper recommendations", "use research to improve my code". Always called AFTER learn-from-paper has completed credibility and security checks — never ingests papers directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。