788 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
End-to-end execution of a scouted third-party provider access campaign. Use when a Provider Access Launch task is ready_to_submit or scouted easy_execute and needs account or app registration, scopes, reviewer assets, Vault credential custody, the canonical connection, and real verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adding a file type or upgrading any of its capability slots in the files feature (preview, edit, thumbnail, grid card, info, share, versions, conversion, diff, rail panel). Use when supporting a new extension or MIME type, building a previewer, touching FILE_TYPES, PreviewKind, FilePreview.tsx, EDITABLE_KINDS, or surfaces/single-file/, or working the FILE_SURFACES.md wishlist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for reviewing academic manuscripts submitted to journals, particularly in political science, economics, and quantitative social sciences. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on academic papers, research designs, or empirical strategies. Emphasizes methodological rigor, causal identification strategies, and constructive feedback on research design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality assurance review for implementations. Use when reviewing code quality, checking implementation standards, performing QA cycles, or validating feature quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit verification pipeline — static security scan, baseline-aware quality gates, independent reviewer subagent, and auto-fix loop. Use after code changes and before committing, pushing, or opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quarterly Silicon Agent performance evaluation with ByteDance-style calibration, forced distribution ranking, dual-track (technical/management) assessment, and automated score calculation. Includes real evaluation forms, calibration meeting scripts, and PIP templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and run multi-agent content production teams on OpenClaw with single-repo architecture, symlink-based file sharing, role-specialized AGENTS.md, and automated review-fix-score loops. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 3+ agents with writer/reviewer/scorer/fixer roles for content creation, (2) Creating a quality-controlled publishing pipeline, (3) Bootstrapping agent workspaces with symlinks and tool configs from scratch, (4) Running multi-round review→fix→score cycles until a quality threshold is met, (5) Debugging agent spawn permissions, tool-call loops, or symlink issues. Based on real production experience building a 6-agent content team (2026-03-30).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5 proven agent skill design patterns (Tool Wrapper, Generator, Reviewer, Inversion, Pipeline) from Google's ADK. Build reliable, composable skills with templates, decision trees, and composition guides. Stop cramming logic into prompts—use structured patterns instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews authentication and authorization implementation for session management, CSRF, cookie security, and auth flow vulnerabilities with findings, severity assessment, and fix recommendations. Use for "auth review", "session security", "CSRF protection", or "authentication audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when serving as a peer reviewer and deciding whether and how AI may assist, when a manuscript under review must never be pasted into an external tool, or when a confidentiality-preserving review and disclosure are needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates comprehensive, context-aware code review checklists tailored to the specific codebase, programming language, and team standards. Analyzes PR diffs and suggests what reviewers should focus on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-PR code review checklist for this repo. Plan alignment, security gates, layering, dead code, API-surface completeness. Used by the code-reviewer agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
在用户已经完成一次 implementation 工作后，把项目里的 implementation plan + git diff/log 渲染成一份单文件 HTML 实施报告。报告包含 TL;DR、风险概览、架构图（mermaid）、Before/After 数据流、决策记录卡片、风险清单。用于开会前快速对齐团队、向 reviewer 解释设计决策、归档实施叙事。当用户说"生成实施报告"、"impl-explain"、"explain implementation"、"展示这次实施方案"、"做一份 HTML 实施总结"时调用本 skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。