「risk」の検索結果

Interprets Culture Index (CI) surveys, behavioral profiles, and personality assessment data. Supports individual profile interpretation, team composition analysis (gas/brake/glue), burnout detection, profile comparison, hiring profiles, manager coaching, interview transcript analysis for trait prediction, candidate debrief, onboarding planning, and conflict mediation. Accepts extracted JSON or PDF input via OpenCV extraction script. Use when the user shares a Culture Index PDF or JSON profile, asks what someone's CI traits mean, compares Culture Index profiles across a team or against a hiring profile, or asks about burnout risk from Survey-versus-Job gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Social engineering attack techniques beyond email phishing for authorized red team and physical penetration testing engagements. Covers pretexting methodology (persona creation, authority and urgency psychological triggers, rapport building), vishing (voice phishing via caller ID spoofing, IVR system exploitation, VoIP infrastructure setup with Twilio/Asterisk), smishing (SMS-based phishing, carrier gateway abuse, short code impersonation), physical social engineering (tailgating and piggybacking, RFID badge cloning with Proxmark3, lock picking and bypass, dumpster diving for sensitive documents), USB drop attacks (Rubber Ducky keystroke injection, Bash Bunny multi-vector payloads, O.MG cable covert implants, BadUSB firmware attacks), watering hole attack planning and execution, and OSINT-driven targeting (LinkedIn harvesting, organizational chart reconstruction, employee pattern analysis). Integrates with the Social Engineering Toolkit for attack automation, Proxmark3 for RFID/NFC cloning, USB Rubber Ducky and Bash Bunny for physical payload delivery, and BeEF for browser exploitation. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1598 (Phishing for Information), T1566 (Phishing), T1091 (Replication Through Removable Media), and T1189 (Drive-by Compromise). All techniques require explicit written authorization and defined rules of engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing dated public-equity event paths, probabilities, payoffs, and expected returns. Do not use for generic catalyst lists, risk sizing, hedges, capital structure, covenants, or credit recovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an AI product idea across outcomes, hypotheses, risks, and positioning. Use when deciding whether an AI solution deserves investment or recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select the right Proof of Life (PoL) probe based on hypothesis, risk, and resources. Use this to match the validation method to the real learning goal, not tooling comfort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define a Proof of Life probe to test a risky hypothesis cheaply. Use when you need harsh truth before building real product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate pricing changes using ARPU, conversion, churn risk, NRR, and payback. Use when deciding whether a pricing move should ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repositories to build a security ownership topology (people-to-file), compute bus factor and sensitive-code ownership, and export CSV/JSON for graph databases and visualization. Use when the user explicitly wants a security-oriented ownership or bus-factor analysis grounded in git history (for example: orphaned sensitive code, security maintainers, CODEOWNERS reality checks for risk, sensitive hotspots, or ownership clusters). Do NOT use for general maintainer lists, non-security ownership questions, or threat modeling (use security-threat-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce concise Linear project updates from current milestones, completed and blocked issues, delivery risks, and next actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan any agent skill for security risks before you install or use it. Powered by Tencent Zhuque Lab A.I.G (AI-Infra-Guard). 100% local static analysis — no file contents or credentials leave your device. Compatible with CodeBuddy, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Code, OpenClaw and more. Triggers on: `这个 skill 安全吗`, `skill 安全扫描`, `检查 skill 安全`, `audit skill`, `scan skill`, `check skill safety`, `analyze skill`, `inspect skill`, `verify skill`, `skill security`, `skill supply chain`. Do NOT trigger for general agent usage, full system health checks, project debugging, or normal development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect agentic supply-chain risks: compromised dependencies, malicious plugins/tools/models, and untrusted update sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 (ASI) classification framework. Use for mapping security findings to standardized risk categories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile, audit, and optimize frontend page performance with emphasis on animation work, memory-leak risks, long-session slowdowns, CSS animations, canvas/WebGL requestAnimationFrame loops, marquees, skeletons, GSAP/Three/Matter effects, timers, listeners, and observers. Use when the user asks to make animations performant, pause offscreen animations, look for memory leaks, profile pages that slow the computer over time, fix janky scrolling, reduce CPU/GPU use, or repeat the "only play in view" optimization on React/Vite/Next/frontend pages using Codex Browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HARD BLOCK — never use for prediction-market/Polymarket UpDown queries; route to okx-dapp-discovery when a named DApp (Polymarket/Aave/Hyperliquid/PancakeSwap/Morpho) appears with a timeframe, or 涨跌/updown for BTC/ETH/SOL/XRP/BNB/DOGE/HYPE. Otherwise, read-only on-chain DEX data, 6 groups: TOKEN (search, hot/热门, liquidity, holders/whale, risk metadata, cluster/持仓集中度, trade history, top traders); MARKET (price/价格, K线/OHLC, index price, wallet PnL/胜率, trade history); SIGNAL (smart money/KOL/whale tracking, buy signals/信号, leaderboard/牛人榜); SOCIAL (news/新闻, sentiment/情绪, token vibe/热度, KOL leaderboard); TRENCHES (pump.fun/meme launches/新盘/扫链, dev reputation, bundle/sniper detection/捆绑狙击者, co-investor — read-only; buy/snipe → okx-dapp-discovery); WS (onchainos ws CLI, or custom WebSocket script/脚本). Also owns Market API payment/x402, quota/额度, and MARKET_API_*_OVER_QUOTA/confirming:true for all 6 groups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use git as a safety net - create a checkpoint commit before risky or large changes and roll back cleanly if a change makes things worse. Use before multi-file refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY for static source-to-test pairing: find or list source files/modules without corresponding tests, or suggest test locations from repository structure. Invoke even for a tiny package; do not substitute manual globbing. Uses Roslyn for C#/.NET and tree-sitter for Python, TS/JS, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR: real line/branch/Cobertura data, coverage-backed test priorities, CRAP risk, or grading existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan AI agent skills, plugins, MCP servers, and agent tooling for prompt injection, unsafe commands, secret exposure, and supply-chain risks before installing or trusting them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 5-stage recon pipeline (seed discovery, asset expansion, enrichment, exposure analysis, reporting), asset-graph discipline with 29 asset types, severity rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, asset-level triage rules, scale-based tactics, identity-fabric mapping (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 Teams+SharePoint+OAuth), API and auth-map methodology, JavaScript deep analysis, mobile attack surface, cloud attack surface, breach×identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing (back-off, persona rotation), read-only validator discipline, WAF/CDN bypass + origin discovery, vulnerability prioritization (CVE/EPSS/KEV), phishing infrastructure planning + pretext development, bug bounty submission templates, client deliverable templates with risk translation, threat-actor investigation (incl. RU/CN pivots), cryptocurrency tracing, image/video forensics, chronolocation. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, tracing crypto flows, geolocating media, or performing attribution work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。