1,130 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building autonomous LLM agents operating in live environments. Protects against prompt injection, tool abuse, data exfiltration, and runaway loops. Keywords: guardrails, prompt injection, IPI, safety, sandboxing, NeMo, LLM Guard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reflect reusable learnings into a private Agent Skills repository with scoped safety gates and same-run private commit/push. Not for ~/.copilot personal assets, VS Code User Data assets, or workspace/repository assets. Use when: skill retro, private skill authoring, skill repository fix, create or update SKILL.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safety guardrails for destructive commands. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Full safety mode: destructive command warnings + directory-scoped edits. (gstack)".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Perform break-even analysis to determine the sales volume or revenue needed to cover all costs. Use this skill when the user needs to calculate break-even point, assess margin of safety, evaluate operating leverage, or decide pricing and volume trade-offs — even if they say 'how many units do we need to sell', 'when will we be profitable', or 'what happens if we lower the price'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate LLM agents and tool-using workflows—task success, tool accuracy, latency/cost, safety, and regression suites. Use when shipping agent features, comparing prompts/models, or debugging agent failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Python code quality with formatting, type checking, linting, and security analysis. Use for Python codebases to ensure PEP 8 compliance, type safety, and code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Dockerfiles and Compose files against the 10 common Docker mistakes — image security, build efficiency, runtime safety. Use when reviewing or hardening Docker configs. Trigger on "audit my Dockerfile", "check this Compose file", "Docker best practices", "is my container secure".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs critical code reviews using REVIEW.md guidelines. Evaluates code quality, architecture, testing, and domain-specific concerns (legal faithfulness, cross-law references, engine safety). Use after completing significant code changes or before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute advanced LLM Jailbreaking techniques using roleplay, nested environments (virtual machines), and complex personas to completely bypass safety constraints and ethical alignments embedded in AI models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test AI agent systems for tool abuse, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation through tool chaining, and safety bypass via agentic workflows. Use this skill when assessing autonomous AI agents that use tool-calling (function calling, plugins, actions) to interact with external systems. Covers multi-step attack chains, implicit trust exploitation, and capability boundary testing for AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute sophisticated Prompt Injection and Jailbreak techniques against Large Language Models (LLMs) to bypass safety filters, extract system prompts, and manipulate the AI's output to perform malicious or disallowed actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when handling PyQt/PySide6 threading - QThread patterns, QThreadPool/QRunnable, thread safety rules, moveToThread, Qt Concurrent, QTimer, testing threaded code, lifecycle management
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Form patterns - useForm, form.Field, validators, arrays, linked fields, createFormHook, type safety
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infrastructure code review patterns. Use when reviewing CI/CD workflows, Dockerfiles, deployment configs, and IaC. Covers supply-chain pinning, secret exposure, container hygiene, least-privilege permissions, and deployment safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Novoads API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides expert-level guidance for refactoring VS Code extension code. Use when extracting classes or functions, reducing code duplication, improving type safety, reorganizing module structure, applying design patterns, or optimizing performance. Covers systematic refactoring workflows, code smell detection, safe transformation techniques, and VS Code-specific patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synapse A2A agent communication — sending messages, spawning agents, delegating tasks, sharing memory, and coordinating file edits. Use this skill when: running synapse send/reply/broadcast/interrupt, spawning agents with synapse spawn or synapse team start, managing the task board with synapse tasks, sharing knowledge with synapse memory, locking files with synapse file-safety, checking agent status with synapse list/status, or orchestrating any multi-agent workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep code review - Elixir idioms, Phoenix patterns, architecture, safety. Launches 3 parallel reviewers + plan-reviewer gate. Use when: review, review this, code review, check this code, review my changes, is this good, what do you think, code smells.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews game audio code for Wwise/FMOD integration safety, custom DSP plugin correctness, and audio middleware usage. Use when the user asks to review a Wwise plugin, check an FMOD DSP effect, audit game audio middleware integration, or asks "is my game audio code safe?". Trigger on phrases like "review my Wwise plugin", "check FMOD DSP effect", "is my game audio code safe", "review my audio middleware integration", or when you see AkPluginInfo, FMOD_DSP_DESCRIPTION, IMetaSoundSource, or Execute/process callbacks in game audio code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews JUCE audio plugin code for JUCE-specific correctness issues: thread safety, APVTS parameter patterns, MessageManager usage, ValueTree, and MIDI handling. Use when the user asks to review a JUCE plugin, check a processBlock, audit parameter handling, or asks "is this JUCE code safe?". Trigger on phrases like "review my JUCE plugin", "check my AudioProcessor", "is this APVTS usage correct?", or when you see AudioProcessor, AudioProcessorEditor, or AudioProcessorValueTreeState in the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic checklist for diagnosing audio artifacts. Use when the user describes a sound quality problem — clicks, pops, crackling, silence, DC offset, aliasing, phase issues, or latency problems. Trigger on phrases like "why do I hear clicks?", "my output has DC offset", "there's aliasing in my oscillator", "phase is wrong in mono", "dropout when CPU spikes". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety) and audio-numerics-review (numeric correctness) — use those to fix once the cause is found.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。