3,932 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Render a crouton collection schema (the field-definition JSON) into a human-readable field table + relationships sketch (HTML + PNG + a terse Markdown table), so a human can sign off on the DATA MODEL before any code is generated. Use when an agent drafts or changes a collection schema (before `crouton config` / `generate_collection`), or when asked to "review a schema", "show the data model", "check these fields".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Swap the external provider/library that backs a crouton package (e.g. the map renderer, geocoder, editor engine, storage SDK) while keeping the package's public API stable so consuming apps need no changes. Use when asked to "change the X provider", "replace library Y in package Z", "switch from <vendor A> to <vendor B>" inside packages/. Encodes the keep-the-API-stable playbook + the gotchas (dist .d.ts over docs, generator templates, fixtures, dup-dep type clashes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft and revise evidence-grounded academic manuscripts with adaptable author preferences. Use for section writing, implementing structural edits, claim calibration, citation-integrated prose, prose cleanup, standalone review excerpts, and LaTeX template migration. Use paper-review for critique or author responses, and paper-figures-tables for final visual artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose a comparison newsletter from Ahmad's OpenMark saves — A vs B vs C, side-by-side, table-driven. Use when Ahmad wants to compare tools, models, frameworks, approaches, or platforms across his saves. Trigger phrases include "compare", "X vs Y", "head to head", "which should I use", "differences between", "trade-offs between", "/newsletter-comparison". Output centers a markdown table with consistent columns, supports it with short prose blocks, ends with a clear recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert PDF documents to clean structured Markdown for LLM context. Supports two modes: fast (PyMuPDF) and accurate (IBM Docling TableFormer AI). Features aggressive persistent caching, image extraction with metadata, table detection, and batch processing. Use when asked to convert PDFs, extract PDF content, parse documents, or prepare PDF data for AI/LLM consumption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert Markdown documents to PDF. Two modes available — (1) Playwright-based conversion with Mermaid diagram support for technical documentation, and (2) fpdf2-based professional PDF generation with cover pages, themed styling, and business-quality table formatting for estimates, proposals, and reports. Use this skill when converting Markdown to PDF, generating business documents from Markdown, or converting Mermaid diagrams to images. Triggers on short phrases like "PDFに変換して", "markdownをpdfにして", "PDFにして", "PDF化して", "PDF出力して", "convert to PDF", "make a PDF", or any request involving converting content to PDF format.
再発しやすい危険な実装パターンを、安全側に倒れる標準パターン・禁止事項・共通層・静的ルール候補へ 変換するスキル。ORM強制、deny-by-default認可、サービス経由I/O、永続化確認後の成功表示などを設計する。 レビューで危険コードを見つけるのではなく、危険コードを書きにくくする設計標準を作ることが目的。 Use when turning repeated defect patterns into safe architectural defaults, forbidden-to-safe mapping tables, common layer designs, and enforceable static analysis rules.
ユーザーストーリーを Independent / Valuable / Small / Testable で点検し、満たさないストーリーを分割または再定義するための skill。要件定義完成直後 (ユーザーストーリーを書き終えた直後) に必ず発火させる。基本設計中や実装中に「このストーリー大きすぎる」「他のストーリーに依存している」「ユーザー価値が見えない」「受け入れテストが書けない」と気付いたタイミングでも発火させる。Small は『ユーザー価値を保ったまま分割可能な最小単位』として価値ベースで判定する (技術的なサイクル数ではない)。Negotiable は意図的に落とし (要件 / 設計フェーズで固める方針)、Estimable は暗黙 (固める方針なら自動で満たされる)。
Create a language-agnostic ghost package (spec + portable tests) from an existing repo by extracting SPEC.md, exhaustive tests.yaml (operations and/or scenarios), INSTALL.md, README.md, VERIFY.md, and upstream LICENSE files with provenance and regeneration instructions. Use when prompts say "/tw-ghost", "ghostify this repo", "spec-ify/spec-package this library", "ghost library", or ask to extract portable spec/tests for libraries or tool-using agent loops (scenario testing); do not use for implementation work or editing skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or update stable, canonical, any-human, PMF, and adoption claims using adoption/canonicity governance packets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for EF Core entities/configurations, semantic value persistence, portable constraints, DbContext/query filters, repositories/specifications, migrations, model snapshots, transactions, or seeded lookup tables; use query-optimization specifically for N+1 or slow SQL diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive results analysis for empirical research: generate publication-quality descriptive statistics and balance tables, interpret regression coefficients with economic magnitude and effect sizes, assess identification assumption diagnostics, and produce structured results memos. Use when asked to create summary statistics, Table 1, balance tests, interpret results, assess economic significance, or write results narratives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Called by /plot to upgrade regression and summary tables to top-journal standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a DRAFT weekly KPI report from the figures the user pastes or attaches (this week, last week, optionally target and earlier weeks): a metrics table with change versus last week computed only from the stated figures, plain-language notes per metric, and numbered questions on every figure that moved more than the agreed threshold, crossed its target or broke its run. Use when the user asks to "write the weekly KPI report", "turn these numbers into this week's metrics report", "what changed versus last week", "draft the Monday numbers update" or "add commentary to this metrics table". Do not use for a recurring emailed report with a maintained trend sheet, use report-attachment-analyzer instead; for actuals versus budget, use budget-variance-explainer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews the instructions text and skills of a declarative agent, with its stated capabilities, knowledge sources and audience, for prompt-injection exposure, data-leakage paths, over-broad permissions and missing refusals, and returns an attack-surface map, a findings table with severity, quoted evidence and attack path, one pasteable fix per finding, a probe pack the owner can run and a refusal-coverage table. Use when the user asks to "red-team this agent", "check these instructions for prompt injection", "could this agent leak data", "review the permissions on my agent" or "what should this agent refuse". Do not use for checking a SKILL.md against the format rules, use skill-file-reviewer instead; do not use for designing the launch test set, use agent-evaluation-plan instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages an incoming non-disclosure agreement against the organisation's written standard NDA positions and returns a DRAFT triage pack: a clause-by-clause deviations table with a severity band, a suggested response per clause quoted from the positions document, open questions and a governing-law flag, all for counsel to decide. Never gives legal advice or an acceptability call. Use when the user asks to "triage this NDA against our standard positions", "screen this confidentiality agreement before it goes to legal", "red-flag this mutual NDA", "first-pass the counterparty's NDA" or "is this NDA standard or does it need counsel". Do not use for a full review of an MSA, SOW, licence or any whole contract, use contract-review-pack instead; for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts the instructions field of a declarative agent that orchestrates a set of custom skills, under a character cap (default 8,000), from the skills' names and descriptions: role and scope, one routing rule per skill, workflow order, gates written as workflow holds, global rules, output format and what the agent never does. Returns the text in a fenced block with its character count labelled counted or estimated, plus a skill inventory, routing table, gate table, rules trace and open questions for the owner. Use when the user asks to "write the instructions for my agent", "draft a system prompt that ties these skills together", "tighten these agent instructions to fit the cap", "how should the agent route between these skills" or "revise my agent's orchestration text". Do not use to review a single SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns an actuals-versus-budget extract (spreadsheet, export or pasted table) into a DRAFT variance table with absolute and percentage variances, favourable or adverse marking and a ranking by size, then drafts plain-language driver hypotheses for each material variance as questions to verify with a named owner, never as asserted causes. Use when the user asks to "explain these variances", "why are we over budget on this line", "write the variance commentary for the management pack", "actuals versus budget analysis" or "which lines drive the variance". Do not use for a dataset with no budget or comparison column, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for weekly operational figures against last week, use kpi-weekly-report-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。