「three」の検索結果

Implement a ready rolling-wave slice without locking it down with broad tests yet. Use when the user explicitly wants to code the current docs/rolling-wave/{project}/slices/NNN-slug.md slice, mark it in progress while working, implement small or cohesive work in the main context by default, use one to three gpt-5.6-terra workers only for genuine parallel chunks or large discovery/mechanical work where delegation pays for its handoff cost, pause or hand off chunks marked human-fit when appropriate, record implementation notes and final-test backlog, preserve the original slice contract, and mark completed implementation ready for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mint a new YYYY-MM-DD-exact-coding-baseline snapshot under research/workflow-dev/export/. Detects the current best correctness- oriented workflow from research/workflow-dev/workflow-construction.md (or takes an explicit source-workflow argument) and transforms it from a lab workflow into a consumer-ready one on three axes: strips lab-only measurement content, re-enables human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and converts auto-loading config into an explicitly-invoked skill. Supports both promoted EXACT Coding lines: Opus/Hybrid and SOL/Predictive TDD. Exports Claude Code, pi, OpenCode, cursor-agent and, for SOL, Copilot. Trigger when the user says "exact-coding baseline export", "neue exact-coding baseline", "exact-coding-baseline-export", or asks to refresh the baseline snapshot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared in-workflow quality gates for code/PR skills — the gate model, trust tiers, and the three primitives (evidence-before-done, independent judge, anti-gaming). DO NOT TRIGGER directly — referenced by consumer skills via relative path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when constructing base / upside / downside scenarios — three-statement modeling, sensitivity analysis, optionality reasoning. Triggers on 'model the scenarios', 'what if growth halves'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-round editorial review before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use to validate a spec artifact's decisions with the user across three contexts — a freshly-authored Feature Spec (idea-to-spec), an existing canonical spec before PBI decomposition (spec-to-pbi), or a refined idea + §8 test-specs (idea-to-pbi deep mode). Detects the context, walks every applicable validation category, and runs an exhaustive but budget-bounded blocking clarification gate so every non-obvious or conflicting decision is confirmed before the artifact drives downstream work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by create-issue, create-issue-from-issue-number, and update-issue. It formats an implementation-ready GitHub Issue body, runs the pre-posting checklist, executes `gh issue create` or `gh issue edit`, and optionally posts a 確認事項 follow-up comment. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the three parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has completed analysis. If a user asks to 'format an issue body' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/create-issue, /create-issue-from-issue-number, or /update-issue) rather than invoking this one directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React. 29 domain-specific rules covering 3D, animations, audio, captions, charts, transitions, and more. Use when building video in React with Remotion — animations, audio, captions, charts, or transitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes article structure, identifies positions requiring visual aids, generates illustrations with Type × Style × Palette three-dimension approach. Use when user asks to "illustrate article", "add images", "generate images for article", or "为文章配图".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cute 3D toy assets from photo-reference manifests. Use when Codex needs to turn scene photos into 2D toy concept prompts, choose a photo-to-3D route, produce or plan GLB assets for Three.js, or maintain a repeatable personal-gift/toy-character generation workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to actually run every kind of test in nuxt-crouton (unit/e2e/typecheck/lint, verified commands) plus the HONEST coverage picture — which packages have real tests vs zero, the dormant skipped/todo cases behind three mocking walls, and what CI truly gates vs what CLAUDE.md claims. Use when asked "how do I run the tests", "is X covered by tests", "what does CI actually check", "why is this suite skipped", "where do I add a test", or before trusting a green build as evidence that something works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves complex, open-ended problems using a knockout tournament mechanism. Generates an initial population of diverse candidate answers, pairs them into head-to-head matches, produces a hybrid "child" solution from each pair, and advances the best of the three through a bracket until a winner emerges. Use this skill whenever the user wants to competitively select the best answer from a field of alternatives, asks for a "tournament" or "bracket" style search, wants a faster alternative to full evolutionary search, or uses phrases like: "run a tournament on this", "bracket-style search", "let solutions compete", "knockout search", "find the best answer by elimination", or "which solution wins?". Also trigger when the problem is open-ended and the user wants a clear winner quickly rather than a deep multi-generation refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wardley Mapping for strategic positioning — map your value chain from customer need to underlying components, plot where each component sits on the evolution curve (novel to commodity), and spot the strategic plays that movement creates. Use this skill when someone wants to understand where their industry is heading, whether they're building things they should be buying, where competitors are vulnerable, what's about to become commoditised, or why their competitive advantage is eroding. Triggers on questions about build-vs-buy, component evolution, value chain analysis, commoditisation risk, or strategic positioning relative to market movement. Three modes — full diagnostic (build a map from scratch), review (update positions and reassess), and alert triggers (set tripwires for when components move). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy cascade based on Roger Martin and A.G. Lafley's Playing to Win framework. Five interconnected choices that define a real strategy — not a vision statement, not a list of priorities, not a strategic plan that's really just a budget with adjectives. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for building or rebuilding the full cascade, Review for pressure-testing an existing one, and Alert Triggers for defining the tripwires that tell you the cascade is breaking. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategy, strategic choices, winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, competitive strategy, or when someone says "we need a strategy" and means it. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test plans before committing by imagining they've already failed. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full pre-mortem session — vivid failure scene-setting, six failure categories, the monkey test, and concrete plan adjustments. Review mode checks previous findings monthly for changed probabilities and new failure modes. Alert Triggers mode defines and monitors early warning signals across four trigger categories. Use before any major commitment — strategy, investment, product launch, partnership — or regularly to keep assumptions honest. The planning fallacy is real. The spreadsheet looked great so everyone stopped thinking. This is the antidote. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continuous environmental scanning across six PESTEL categories — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal. Not a one-time analysis but an ongoing radar. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full scan and prioritises forces by impact, speed, and reversibility. Review mode checks the watch list monthly for movement and new signals. Alert mode defines concrete monitoring triggers for each top force. Use whenever someone wants to understand external forces acting on their business, assess macro risk, prepare for planning, or check whether the world has moved since last time they looked. Connects to the strategy map (forces act on the chain) and Wardley Map (forces drive component evolution). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。