「understand」の検索結果

Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tree-sitting (structural) with semantic (why/what-for) layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug GitHub Actions workflows by downloading logs, analyzing summaries, and understanding how agentic workflows and the AWF firewall work together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arkcli +chat：通过数据面 Responses API 快速对话/推理，支持多模态、流式、多轮、临时 API Key/Base URL/Endpoint 执行与无副作用 dry-run。当用户给出 Endpoint 但未说明工作流时，先用 resources resolve 识别候选；已经出现 Responses API capability/access 错误时，只读用 models get 核对精确模型的 api_support，不重试真实调用。有明确产出形态的多模态理解走 arkcli-understand。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

arkcli resources 实时控制面查询：列出当前/指定 profile 可见资源及其调用兼容性；把 Endpoint 解析为权威模型、模态与候选工作流。read-only，不写 profile.yaml。用户临时给出 ep-... 但未说明该走 Chat、Understand 还是 Gen 时优先使用。反触发：用户已观察到 Endpoint NotFound，并要判断 ID 是否不完整或仅存在于历史用量时，owning skill 必须是 arkcli-infer-endpoint。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a diary study plan with prompts, duration, participant criteria, and analysis framework. Use when you need to understand user behavior over time in natural contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a 4-quadrant empathy map (Says, Thinks, Does, Feels) to synthesize user research into actionable insights. Use when you need to quickly capture and share user understanding across the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the strategic and scientific reasoning of Demis Hassabis, CEO and co-founder of Google DeepMind, AlphaGo and AlphaFold, and 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating AI for scientific discovery, tackling "root node" problems, designing reinforcement learning systems, or discussing AGI timelines, safety, and global governance. Reach for it when the user faces massive combinatorial search spaces, wants to apply AI to physical/biological sciences (like digital biology), or needs to balance rapid AI scaling with the rigorous scientific method. Apply these mental models to shift the focus from building consumer apps to using AI as the ultimate meta-solution for understanding reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Geoffrey Hinton, deep learning pioneer and 2018 Turing Award winner. Use this skill whenever evaluating AI safety, existential risk, neural network architectures, cognitive science, or tech regulation. Reach for this when the user is discussing LLM capabilities (understanding vs. autocomplete), the biological vs. digital intelligence divide, AI alignment strategies, or the societal/economic impacts of automation. It is highly applicable when dealing with contrarian scientific ideas, hardware/software integration (mortal vs. immortal computing), or global cooperation on technological threats. Do not wait for the user to name Hinton; trigger this skill proactively for any deep learning or AI existential risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the Neoplatonic and mathematical reasoning of Hypatia of Alexandria. Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with the pursuit of truth, foundational logic, the hierarchy of knowledge, or the distraction of superficial and physical desires versus deeper intellectual pursuits. Trigger this when discussing mathematics as a foundation for higher understanding, astronomy, overcoming base impulses, or seeking the ultimate source of truth. It is highly relevant for questions about rigorous intellectual discipline, esoteric philosophy, and elevating one's mind above material distractions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the analytical and therapeutic philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, 20th-century philosopher of language (Tractatus / Philosophical Investigations). Use this skill when the user is stuck in conceptual confusion, debating semantics, trapped by abstract definitions, or trying to solve a problem that is actually just a linguistic misunderstanding. Trigger this for topics involving the limits of language, meaning as use, logical clarification, or when the user is over-theorizing instead of looking at practical applications. It helps dissolve 'fly-bottle' traps by examining how words are actually used in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the frameworks of Aristotle (ancient Greek philosopher, logic, ethics, metaphysics, 384-322 BCE) to decision-making, ethics, and analysis. Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with moral dilemmas, character development, habit formation, finding balance (the Golden Mean), persuasive communication (rhetoric), or understanding the root causes and ultimate purpose (teleology) of a project or system. Reach for this skill even if the user doesn't name Aristotle, especially when discussing career fulfillment, long-term happiness (eudaimonia), balancing extremes, or structuring persuasive arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and maintain AI-readable markdown documentation for a codebase in docs/. Use this skill whenever the user asks to document their codebase, generate project docs, create architecture docs, update documentation after code changes, build a knowledge base for AI agents, create onboarding docs, map out a codebase, or explain a project structure. Also trigger when users say things like "document this repo", "create docs for my project", "update the docs", "write architecture documentation", "help AI understand my code", "generate a codebase overview", or "maintain docs". This skill is specifically about creating structured markdown files in a docs/ directory that serve as a knowledge base — NOT about writing inline code comments, README files, or API reference docs from docstrings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for the Kimix web frontend (src/app/) — vanilla TypeScript + Vite, SSE-based chat UI mirroring sse_cli.py. Use when modifying the frontend, adding new UI features, changing the API client, or understanding the message rendering pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for the Kimix HTTP serve system — FastAPI backend + TypeScript/Vite frontend. Use when adding new backend endpoints, modifying the session manager, changing the frontend API client, or understanding how data flows from backend to UI. Covers dummy_app.py, dummy_session_manager.py, sse_cli.py, and src/app/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the stakeholder asks about an analysis outcome or its implementation tasks - understand the human approval gate and review the tasks the architect created once the human approved

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated iterative agent runner for spec-based development in Kiro. Wraps kiro-cli in a self-correcting bash loop that picks up tasks from a Kiro spec, implements them one at a time, verifies against exit criteria, and accumulates corrections and codebase patterns across iterations. Use this skill when the user mentions "ralph loop", "ralph", "spec loop", "iterative spec runner", "run my spec tasks automatically", "kiro spec automation", "self-correcting agent loop", "implement spec tasks in a loop", "run kiro-cli in a loop", "automated task implementation", or wants to drive a Kiro spec to completion through repeated agent iterations. Also use when the user wants to set up, configure, troubleshoot, or understand the Ralph Loop workflow — including progress tracking, corrections, codebase patterns, timing logs, and the summary dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。