8,484 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
After making code changes, start the dev server, open the app in Cursor's built-in browser, and verify everything works — check rendering, console errors, and network health. Use proactively after any UI or API change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely update an npm package by checking npmjs.com for the latest version, reading release notes, and handling minor vs major upgrades differently. For minor updates, just do it. For major updates, find the upgrade guide, validate breaking changes, and produce a detailed migration report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up a GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline with linting, testing, type-checking, and deployment steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about revenue, payments, subscriptions, billing, CRM deals, support tickets, production database tables, or other data that PostHog does not collect natively. Also use when a query fails because a table does not exist or returns no results for expected external data. The data warehouse can import from SaaS tools (Stripe, Hubspot, etc.), production databases (Postgres, MySQL, BigQuery, Snowflake), and other arbitrary data sources. Covers checking existing sources, identifying the right source type, and guiding the setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Signals scout that watches a PostHog project's most-viewed dashboards and insights for recent anomalies — sudden bursts, drops, flat-lines, and trend breaks at the daily or hourly level. It discovers what the team actually looks at (view counts, dashboard access), curates a durable watchlist in the scratchpad, and balances re-checking known high-value insights (exploit) against discovering new ones (explore) across runs, since no single run can cover a busy project. Anomalies are scored by robust deviation from each insight's own seasonality-matched baseline; it emits a finding only when a move clears the confidence bar, otherwise it updates the baseline memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage PostHog subscriptions — scheduled email, Slack, or webhook deliveries of insight or dashboard snapshots, optionally with an AI-written summary attached to each delivery. Use when the user wants to subscribe to an insight or dashboard, get an AI summary attached to those deliveries, check existing subscriptions, change delivery frequency, add or remove recipients, or stop receiving updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a user interview topic in PostHog — pick who to target (cohort, emails, or PostHog distinct IDs), draft what to ask about, and prepare the voice-agent context plus a question list. Use when the user asks to "talk to users", "check how users feel about X", "interview some customers", "set up a user interview", "run a user-research call", "find users to ask about Y", or otherwise wants qualitative feedback through a conversation. Walks the user through targeting (cohorts-list, persons-list, or accepting emails / distinct IDs directly), captures the topic, and prompts for agent context and questions before calling user-interview-topics-create. Cohort targeting is resolved to explicit emails/distinct_ids at create time — topics snapshot their audience and do not re-evaluate cohort membership later. Do NOT trigger when the user is uploading a recorded interview audio file (that's the separate UserInterview/transcript flow) or only browsing existing topics with user-interview-topics-list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep iterating on code changes until the tests pass, the build succeeds, or linting is clean. Runs in a tight loop of fix → run → check → repeat. Use when you want the agent to autonomously grind through test failures or build errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy applications to Kubernetes — Deployments, Services, Ingress, ConfigMaps, Secrets, health checks, and scaling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides a user from "I want to watch recordings but don't know which ones" to a short, high-signal list of sessions worth watching. Use when the user asks which sessions or replays to watch, wants help finding interesting / useful recordings, says they don't know where to start in session replay, or wants to watch sessions about a goal (signup, pricing, onboarding, checkout, a feature, rageclicks, errors, mobile, a specific person) without naming exact filters. Turns a vague intent into a focused RecordingsQuery via `query-session-recordings-list`, then deep-links the best few and hands off to `investigating-replay`. Do NOT use when the user already has a recording/session ID (use investigating-replay) or wants the replay for a known error issue (use finding-replay-for-issue).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and diagnose a PostHog endpoint's execution logs — error messages, failed runs, cache misses, slow runs, or unexpected row counts during endpoint invocations. Use when the user says "my endpoint is failing", "show me the logs for endpoint X", "what error did endpoint Y produce", "why did endpoint Z return no rows", "is this endpoint hitting cache", or "check the last N runs". Focused on a single named endpoint's runtime log entries, not project-wide auditing or query performance profiling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses CI and pull-request pipeline health for a GitHub repo using the engineering analytics MCP tools — pull-requests (PR list with CI status), workflow-health (per-workflow CI trends), and pr-lifecycle (a single PR's timeline). Use when asked whether CI is getting faster or slower, which GitHub Actions workflow is the slow or flaky long-pole, how long PRs take from open to merge, how an author's merge time compares to the cohort, which open PRs have failing or pending CI, or where a specific pull request is stuck. Triggers on "engineering analytics", "is CI getting slower", "slow workflow", "flaky CI", "time to merge", "cycle time", "PR throughput", "failing checks", "where is PR <n> stuck", "CI long pole", "what's holding up this PR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep. TRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and clean up stale feature flags in a PostHog project. Use when the user wants to find unused, fully rolled out, or abandoned feature flags, review them for safety, and then disable or delete them. Covers staleness detection, dependency checking, and safe removal workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures the analytics side of a PostHog experiment — exposure criteria (default `$feature_flag_called` vs custom exposure events), primary and secondary metrics, the supported metric types (count, sum, ratio with `math` and `math_property`, retention with `retention_window_start` and `start_handling`), multivariate user handling ("Exclude" vs "First seen variant"), and how to read results once the experiment is live. Use when the user adds or edits a primary or secondary metric (e.g. "add a secondary metric tracking 'downloaded_file' per user"), sets up a ratio metric (e.g. "revenue from purchase_completed / pageviews"), sets up a retention metric (e.g. "$pageview → uploaded_file, 7-day window"), configures custom exposure (e.g. "only count users who hit /checkout"), changes multivariate handling, or asks "who is in the analysis?", "how do I measure impact?", "is this winning?", "what's the confidence level?", or "should I ship?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a systematic security audit of a codebase, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and insecure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check out two branches in separate worktrees, start both dev servers on different ports, screenshot the same pages, and produce a visual diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。