8,195 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Clarify a concrete requirements decision, create one bounded static interview packet, or run an explicitly user-invoked frontier batch over a plan, decision, or idea; trigger on explicit grill/interview/refinement intent or a named material ambiguity, not on ordinary planning, implementation, research, test-plan, report-style review, or BUILD work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Flutter/Dart cross-platform apps with widgets, state management, navigation, tests, and performance patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build React Native/Expo mobile apps with navigation, native UI, state, networking, tests, and release workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, edit, fix, or explain Mermaid diagrams for relationships, decision branches, interactions, lifecycles, and data models; also use when the parent selects a diagram to materially clarify an explanation. Do not trigger for simple status, one fact, short lists, quantitative charts, or marketing slides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates reusable Terraform modules with proper structure, variables, outputs, and state management for infrastructure as code. Use when users request "Terraform setup", "infrastructure as code", "IaC module", "cloud provisioning", or "Terraform module".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates data table patterns with filtering, sorting, pagination, row actions, column configuration, server/client rendering modes, and empty/loading states. Use when building "data tables", "list views", "admin tables", or "data grids".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Request for Comments documents for technical proposals including problem statement, solution design, alternatives, risks, and rollout plans. Use for "RFC", "technical proposals", "design docs", or "architecture proposals".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right library for a given frontend task from a curated, opinionated list — numbers, OTP inputs, charts, command menus, virtualization, drag and drop, toasts, state, styling, and more. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete page layouts and shells for common patterns (dashboard, authentication, settings, CRUD pages) with consistent navigation, layout components, routing structure, and state management placeholders. Use when building "new page", "dashboard layout", "auth pages", or "admin panel structure".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates safe refactor plans for messy UI code including component splitting strategies, state simplification, performance optimizations, and accessibility improvements. Provides phased approach, risk assessment, and "done" criteria. Use when refactoring "legacy code", "messy components", "performance issues", or "large files".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes flaky tests by identifying root causes (timing issues, shared state, randomness, network dependencies) and provides stabilization strategies. Use for "flaky tests", "test stability", "intermittent failures", or "test debugging".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates consistent error handling with custom error classes, HTTP status mapping, structured logging, safe client messages, and error taxonomy. Use when standardizing "error handling", "logging", "error responses", or "exception management".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds multi-step forms with validation schemas (Zod/Yup), step components, shared state management, progress indicators, review steps, and error handling. Use when creating "multi-step forms", "wizard flows", "onboarding forms", or "checkout processes".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts Figma/design specifications into production-ready UI components with accurate spacing, typography, color tokens, responsive rules, and interaction states (hover, focus, disabled, active). Generates Tailwind/shadcn code with design system tokens mapping. Use when translating "Figma to code", "design specs to components", or "implement design system".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unifies API response patterns across endpoints including pagination format, error structure, status codes, response envelopes, and versioning strategy. Provides contract documentation, shared TypeScript types, middleware utilities, and migration plan. Use when standardizing "API contracts", "response formats", "API conventions", or "API consistency".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-step agent workflows with tool usage, retry logic, state management, and budget controls. Provides orchestration diagrams, tool execution order, fallback strategies, and cost limits. Use for "AI agents", "agentic workflows", "multi-step AI", or "autonomous systems".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing a course, assessment, or student-feedback workflow and deciding where AI assistance is acceptable, when grading or feedback must stay within academic-integrity and FERPA/KVKK boundaries, or when AI-use rules for students need stating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wireless / 802.11 attack methodology for red team engagements and wireless security assessments. Covers monitor-mode setup, WPA/WPA2-PSK handshake capture and PMKID attacks, WPA3 SAE downgrade and Dragonblood, WPA-Enterprise (EAP) attacks (MSCHAPv2 cracking, EAP-TLS cert theft, evil-twin RADIUS), Karma / Known Beacons / Mana evil twin attacks, captive-portal phishing, KRACK and FragAttacks, WPS Pixie Dust, deauthentication and disassociation attacks, rogue AP construction (hostapd-mana), 802.1X bypass, MAC randomization defeat, BLE/Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4 sidebands, and Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 considerations. Use when scoping wireless pentest, war-driving an estate, or testing corporate wireless segmentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OAuth 2.0 attack checklist: authorization code interception, redirect_uri bypass, CSRF on OAuth flow, state parameter abuse, open redirector chaining, token leakage via Referer, PKCE bypass, and scope escalation. Use when testing OAuth implementations in web apps or bug bounty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。