Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a customer referral program (who may accept the reward, how the introduction is made), designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for an early-stage startup where the founder is still doing the selling — running founder-led sales, setting up a design-partner program, judging whether you have product-market fit, deciding what not to do yet, deciding when to hire the first AE or first marketer, and moving upmarket to larger buyers. Also use it when your company has just acquired another (or is about to), to plan the marketing integration: what you may and may not do between signing and close, the first letter to the acquired customers, whether to keep, endorse, fold in or retire the acquired brand, merging the two marketing databases without mailing people who opted out, when to start cross-selling, and announcing a product sunset. Also use it to design a demand-generation campaign and the channel plan it runs on: one campaign with one job, the offer for buyers who are and are not in market, what each channel is for, the kill and scale rules set before launch, the follow-up sales agrees to, the yearly calendar of always-on programs and tentpole campaigns, and which channels to keep, test or stop. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: founder-led sales, founder-led GTM, design partners, design partner agreement, first customers, first 10 customers, do we have product-market fit, PMF, Sean Ellis test, very disappointed survey, pre-seed, seed stage, when to hire our first AE, first sales hire, first marketing hire, moving upmarket, going upmarket, enterprise readiness, first enterprise deal, what do enterprise buyers need before they sign, positioning, product launch, beta program, early access program, design partners, private preview, public preview, general availability, GA launch, when can we call it GA, can sales sell a beta feature, selling the roadmap, launch tier, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, ideal customer profile, ICP, what is our real ICP, who actually buys from us, refresh our ICP from closed-won deals, ICP refresh before planning, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget. Also triggers on public-sector marketing: sell to government, government marketing, public sector go-to-market, federal marketing, state and local government, SLED, FedRAMP, FedRAMP marketing claims, can we say FedRAMP ready, GovRAMP, StateRAMP, VPAT, accessibility confor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents☆ 212026年10月13日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronics Drafter — sizing a conductor and conduit for a panel or feeder circuit against NEC ampacity and fill tables, building a schematic/elementary diagram or one-line diagram on IEEE 315/ANSI Y32.2 symbols, cross-referencing wire numbers between a schematic and a panel wiring diagram, sizing a PCB trace against IPC-2221 current tables, or QC-checking an electrical drawing set before issuance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a working disc jockey — building or troubleshooting an open-format club or wedding set, reading a dance floor that's emptying, sequencing transitions by key and phrase, negotiating a mobile-DJ contract, or planning gear redundancy for a live paid event.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Brickmason/Blockmason — selecting mortar type for a load-bearing vs. veneer application, sizing and placing control or expansion joints, specifying veneer-tie spacing and cavity-wall drainage/weep-hole layout, applying cold-weather masonry protection thresholds, or diagnosing a moisture or cracking failure in existing masonry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Boilermaker — qualifying or selecting a welding procedure for a pressure-boundary repair, deciding whether a defect is a code "repair" or an "alteration" under the National Board Inspection Code, sizing a tube-to-drum rolled joint expansion, reading radiographic or ultrasonic weld inspection results against acceptance criteria, or setting a post-repair hydrostatic test pressure and hold time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins☆ 212026年8月14日 更新
Find quick SEO wins by identifying high-impression, low-CTR keywords using Google Search Console data. Surfaces keywords already ranking where better titles or content expansion could quickly boost traffic. Use when user says "GSC opportunities", "quick wins", "low CTR keywords", "high impressions low clicks", or "easy SEO wins".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lionkiii/claude-seo-skills☆ 212026年6月11日 更新
Initialize a Git repository with an initial commit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Validate Jira/JPD ticket reference and create a feature branch
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Auto-commit changes after a Spec Kit command completes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Error handling review — silent failure detection, catch block analysis, error logging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Perform a dual-lens critical review of the specification and plan from both product strategy and engineering risk perspectives before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Run the speckit implementation phase chunk-by-chunk in clean-context subagents, then review, then produce a final report. Picks up from an existing tasks.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Refresh the managed Spec Kit section in coding agent context file(s)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Type design analysis — encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Test coverage quality analysis — behavioral coverage, critical gap identification, test resilience evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
opsmill/infrahub-ansible☆ 202026年10月14日 更新