「auditing」の検索結果

Use when writing, auditing, or troubleshooting Salesforce Validation Rules. Triggers: 'validation rule', 'required field formula', 'rule fires unexpectedly', 'integration failing validation', 'data quality', 'errorConditionFormula', 'errorDisplayField', 'errorMessage 255 characters', 'ValidationRule metadata', 'validationRule-meta.xml', 'deploy validation rule inactive', 'bypass custom permission', 'FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION', 'validation rule on custom metadata type', 'compound field validation rule', 'require at least one child record before a stage', 'HasOpportunityLineItem'. NOT for Flow-based validation — use admin/flow-for-admins for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing Salesforce access control — deciding between Profiles, Permission Sets, and Permission Set Groups. Triggers: 'user can't see field', 'too many profiles', 'permission model', 'least privilege', 'profile migration', 'what stays on the profile', 'profile only settings', 'login hours permission set', 'layout assignment permission set', 'IsOwnedByProfile', 'profile retrieve empty'. NOT for sharing rules or record-level access — use admin/sharing-and-visibility for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, auditing, or troubleshooting Salesforce Reports and Dashboards. Triggers: 'report', 'dashboard', 'missing data in report', 'pipeline report', 'cross-filter', 'report subscription', 'dashboard refresh', 'report-meta.xml', 'dashboard running user', 'report folder sharing', 'package.xml report wildcard'. NOT for choosing a report type, bucket fields, summary formulas or joined-report limits — use admin/reports-and-dashboards-fundamentals. NOT for Einstein Analytics / CRM Analytics — use admin/einstein-analytics-basics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, auditing, or simplifying Record Types and Page Layouts. Triggers: 'record type', 'page layout', 'different picklist values', 'different fields per team', 'dynamic forms', 'business process', 'recordTypeVisibilities', 'layoutAssignments', 'record type deploy failed', 'businessProcess required', 'layout assignment matrix'. NOT for layout explosion across many profiles — use admin/record-type-strategy-at-scale. NOT for sharing rules — use admin/sharing-and-visibility. NOT for FLS — use admin/permission-sets-vs-profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Picklist governance for Salesforce admins — Restricted vs Unrestricted, Global Value Sets vs local picklists, value deactivation that breaks reports, dependent picklists with deactivated controllers, and the 'value not in picklist' phantom-data problem. Covers the per-record-type value selection model, the API-vs-label mismatch trap, and the mass-replace-values runbook. NOT for auditing an org where invalid values already exist or record-type mappings have drifted — use admin/picklist-field-integrity-issues. NOT for creating a picklist field or wiring up a dependent picklist — use admin/picklist-and-value-sets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or auditing a dedicated Salesforce integration user — Salesforce Integration user license, API-only profile, permission set layering, MFA waiver, and login monitoring. NOT for creating human users, roles, or login hours — use admin/user-management. NOT for login IP ranges, session lifetime, or OAuth client-credential hardening — use security/api-only-user-hardening. Trigger keywords: service account, API-only user, run-as user, client credentials execution user, LoginHistory, REQUEST_LIMIT_EXCEEDED, integration login failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up or auditing how compliance documentation is structured, collected, and preserved for regulatory audit in Salesforce FSC — covering KYC data collection workflows, AML screening integration setup, audit trail configuration, and regulatory reporting readiness. Triggers: KYC form setup, AML integration configuration, compliance data collection, audit trail setup, regulatory documentation workflow, Field Audit Trail configuration, Setup Audit Trail, Event Monitoring, Discovery Framework, FSC KYC objects, Identity Document setup, Party Identity Verification. NOT for security implementation, NOT for designing AML/KYC architecture (use architect/aml-kyc-process-architecture), NOT for configuring who can access deal or client data (use admin/compliant-data-sharing-setup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or auditing the conversational copy layer of a Salesforce bot or Agentforce agent: utterance authoring strategy, fallback message copy, escalation-criteria phrasing, and persona-consistent dialog scripting across channels. NOT for designing the bot dialog structure, intent model, or handoff architecture — use architect/einstein-bot-architecture. NOT for encoding agent tone in Agentforce system instructions — use agentforce/agentforce-persona-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan code for security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed secrets. Use when a user asks to audit security, find vulnerabilities, check for OWASP issues, scan for secrets, review dependencies for CVEs, detect SQL injection, find XSS vulnerabilities, or harden an application. Covers OWASP Top 10, dependency auditing, secrets detection, and generates fix recommendations with severity ratings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and operate the Claude Code harness for large codebases. Builds CLAUDE.md hierarchies, scoped test/lint commands, file exclusions, codebase maps, hooks, skills, subagent strategies, and LSP/MCP wiring. Use when setting up Claude Code for a new repo, auditing an existing configuration, onboarding a team, or scaling from single-developer to org-wide deployment. Triggers on "set up Claude Code for this repo", "optimize my Claude Code config", "audit my CLAUDE.md", "make this codebase navigable", "configure hooks/skills/plugins".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn Chinese text, articles, URLs, or user-defined page plans into polished 1080×1440 Xiaohongshu image-card series in the Quiet Signal visual language. Use when creating, revising, rendering, or visually auditing 小红书图文; use quiet-signal-design alone for non-Xiaohongshu design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and test Claude Code skills against Anthropic's 7 principles. Scans SKILL.md files, checks 8 rules (gotchas, description, allowed-tools, file-size, structure, frontmatter, conflicts, usage-hooks), classifies skill types, generates prescriptions, and runs eval tests. Use when checking skill quality, auditing skills, testing skills, or before publishing skills. Triggers on "스킬 점검", "스킬 진단", "스킬 테스트", "check skills", "audit skills", "test skills", "skill health", "pulser", "pulser eval".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing DecisionsAI, Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Pi, Cline, RTK, workflow pre_chain skills, hooks, projected commands, skill routing, or harness setup for drift, duplication, dead references, slow hooks, bloated context, or stale config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-stack security review — auditing vulnerabilities across infrastructure, smart contracts, CI/CD pipelines, and AI agent systems, plus auth/sessions/crypto and validating user input at API and infrastructure boundaries. Triggers on mentions of "vulnerability", "pentest", "OWASP", "access control", "injection", "CSRF", "JWT", "smart contract audit", "supply chain", "OIDC", or any review of security-sensitive code paths spanning more than one layer. For PII sanitization see [security](../security/SKILL.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when forensically auditing a Claude Code skill/agent/command/workflow library against RULESET.md by a fixed mechanical protocol — probing every file against the mechanically-checkable rules and reporting CONFORMS / VIOLATES / UNVERIFIABLE / N-A counts with quoted evidence. It casts NO judgment and emits NO pass/fail verdict; counts are the headline. Triggers on "investigate the library", "audit against RULESET", "find every violation", "forensic library audit", "evidence-only check". Not for routing/quality/single-responsibility judgment — use skill-library-review. Not the full sharded sweep — use the audit-library command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that browser profiles are actually isolated from one another instead of assuming it - confirm each profile's timezone agrees with its own exit IP, that WebRTC exposes only the proxy, that canvas and WebGL hashes stay identical across relaunches of one profile, and that no two profiles share a persona, a cookie jar, or an address. Use when several of your own accounts or test identities run from one machine and the setup needs checking, when a profile tested clean but something still looks off, when choosing which detection suites to run (CreepJS, whoer, browserleaks WebRTC, pixelscan, liarjs), when auditing what a vendor runtime does with API and proxy credentials, or when asking which layers browser isolation cannot cover at all. Also for 'profile isolation check', 'fingerprint consistency test', 'timezone mismatch', 'WebRTC leak', 'canvas hash unstable', 'account association', 'temporary profile', '防关联', '多账号', '隔离自检'. The SDK is anti-detect-browser; MCP is browser-mcp-agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke for any task involving docstrings, JSDoc/TSDoc, or REST API documentation — even when the request seems handleable without it. Enforces Microsoft contract-first conventions and a bare-minimum rule that Claude won't apply by default: never restate the signature, drop @param/@returns that only echo names and types, always document @throws, and document data shapes as WHAT not WHY. Covers Python docstring styles (Google/NumPy/Sphinx), TSDoc tags and @inheritDoc, and API doc patterns for NestJS/Express/FastAPI/Django. Trigger on: adding or auditing docstrings, redundant or missing tags, deleting comment rot, or producing a documentation-health report. Do not skip for documentation tasks — consistent conventions are the whole point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a solved, verified problem as a durable learning in `docs/solutions/` so the next agent or engineer does not repeat the mistake or redo the investigation, and keep the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary in step. Use after a fix, debugging session, or design decision whose reasoning is not readable from the final code, tests, or existing docs — "document this", "write up what we learned", "capture this learning", "add it to solutions", "that worked, save it for next time". Writes nothing for routine fixes the code already explains. For auditing or cleaning up existing learnings, use `learn-with-docs-refresh`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Google Ads & Meta (Facebook) Ads from your AI coding tool. 99 MCP tools for auditing, creating, and optimizing ad accounts using natural language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Agent Skill design quality against official specifications and best practices. Use when reviewing, auditing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Provides multi-dimensional scoring and actionable improvement suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when creating, auditing, refactoring, or repairing an Agent Skill for reuse, governance, and runtime efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。