「behavior」の検索結果

Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run isolated E2E tests in devcontainer from ai_docs/tests runbooks. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: run an E2E test, execute a test runbook, validate a feature end-to-end, create a new runbook, or test CLI behavior in isolation. If you need to run a multi-step CLI validation sequence (init → install → sync → verify), this is the skill — it handles ssenv isolation, flag verification, and structured reporting. Prefer this over ad-hoc docker exec sequences for any test that follows a runbook or needs reproducible isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grida Desktop Electron shell and release-impact work: BrowserWindow, preload, `window.grida`, menus, protocol/deep links, file associations, Forge, path-scoped bridge security, Electron-only UI bugs, and CDP / Playwright verification. Use for `desktop/`, `editor/app/desktop/**`, `editor/scaffolds/desktop/**`, `editor/lib/desktop/**`, `/desktop/*` CSP, GRIDA-SEC-004, and deciding whether linked-package or hosted-renderer changes require a native Desktop version bump or coordinated release. For implementing daemon/agent-tenant core behavior, use `agent-system` as well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate agent behavior to instructions obtained from an external page

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate difficult conversations and deliver constructive feedback using structured frameworks. Covers the Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up model and Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) feedback technique. Use when preparing for difficult conversations, giving feedback, or managing conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure file upload playbook. Use when testing upload validation, storage paths, processing pipelines, preview behavior, overwrite risks, and upload-to-RCE chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Path traversal and LFI playbook. Use when file paths, download endpoints, include operations, archive extraction, or wrapper behavior may expose filesystem control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSRF testing playbook. Use when reviewing state-changing web flows, anti-CSRF defenses, SameSite behavior, JSON CSRF, login CSRF, and OAuth state handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design motivation systems using Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose (AMP) for products and teams. Use when the user mentions "intrinsic motivation", "gamification isnt working", "rewards arent working", "autonomy", "mastery", "purpose-driven", "my team is disengaged", or "how do I motivate people". Also trigger when designing onboarding progression, fixing broken gamification, or building team structures that sustain high performance. Covers why carrot-and-stick fails and how to build progress systems. For habit-forming product loops, see hooked-ux. For retention behavior design, see improve-retention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing a value proposition. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint. For non-leading interview technique, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design products and pricing around validated willingness to pay, from Ramanujam & Tacke's "Monetizing Innovation". Use when the user mentions "pricing", "how much should we charge", "willingness to pay", "pricing page", "packaging", "freemium vs free trial", "are we leaving money on the table", "nobody buys at this price", "price increase", or "good-better-best". Also trigger when designing or auditing pricing and packaging, validating willingness to pay before building, segmenting customers by value, or choosing between subscription, usage-based, and freemium models. Covers price-before-product, willingness-to-pay talks, the four failures (feature shock, minivation, hidden gem, undead), leader/filler/killer packaging, and behavioral pricing. For offers and guarantees, see hundred-million-offers. For what customers value, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", "decompose conditional", or "clean up this messy code". Also trigger when cleaning up legacy code, preparing code for new features by restructuring, or identifying which transformation fits a specific code smell. Covers smell-driven refactoring, safe transformation sequences, and testing guards. For code-quality foundations, see clean-code. For managing complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use with the dstack skill for model-serving work when the image, serving command, resources, backend/fleet choice, or service behavior is not proven. Guides task-first prototyping on real hardware, choosing fleets/backends that can reuse idle instances and caches, checking vLLM/SGLang sources, and verifying the final dstack service with a model request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or debugging WordPress Interactivity API features (data-wp-* directives, @wordpress/interactivity store/state/actions, block viewScriptModule integration, wp_interactivity_*()) including performance, hydration, and directive behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a WordPress plugin's Abilities API registrations: enumerate abilities, check that callback behavior matches each annotation's claim (the adversarial readonly-but-writes detection), validate permissions and schemas, and validate audit documents produced by wp-abilities-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E2E Testing Standards Guide. Use this rule when you need to write or execute E2E tests, including test naming conventions, test workflows, and test behavior templates. This rule should be used for end-to-end integration testing scenarios to ensure test standardization and maintainability. Example: When writing new E2E tests, use this rule to ensure proper test format and workflow compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review behavioral standards. Reference during code review to ensure consistent quality checks from a QA perspective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, build, redesign, or modify browser-visible web interfaces with product-quality composition, visual systems, interaction states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and browser visual QA. Use for HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React, Vue, or Svelte pages and components, landing pages, dashboards, admin tools, settings, forms, onboarding, responsive layouts, prototypes, and any frontend change that alters visible browser output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores the problem and the range of possible approaches before any code is written — clarifying what is actually being asked, surfacing options with their tradeoffs, and converging on one. Use this at the start of any feature, component, or behavior change, when a request is ambiguous, when the first idea is the only idea on the table, or when a design decision needs pressure-testing before commitment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes down what is being built so a team can build it and know when they are done — problem and success measure before solution, scope stated by exclusion, user-visible behavior including the states everyone forgets, acceptance criteria someone can test, and the open questions named rather than buried. Use this to write a specification, review one that is causing rework, or work out why a delivered feature technically matched the request and still was not what anyone wanted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies a deliberate visual direction to an interface — minimalist editorial, industrial utilitarian, or high-polish commercial — each with its own type scale, palette behavior, surface treatment, and motion. Use this when a product needs a point of view rather than defaults, when choosing between visual directions, when an interface reads as generic, or when restyling something without changing its structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs performance systems that change behavior — expectations, feedback, review cycles, calibration, and handling underperformance. Use this to design or fix a review process, run calibration, write or coach on feedback, address sustained underperformance, or work out why reviews consume weeks and change nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the capability to notice an attack in progress — deciding what to log and retain, centralizing it somewhere tamper-resistant, writing detections that fire on attacker behavior rather than on individual events, tuning out the noise that trains people to ignore alerts, and defining what happens when something fires. Use this to design or assess monitoring coverage, work out why an incident went unnoticed, cut alert volume without losing signal, or decide what a detection capability should cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs quotas, territories and commission plans that produce the behavior the business needs — sizing territories against real potential, setting quotas people can hit often enough to believe in, choosing what to pay on, handling accelerators, draws, clawbacks and disputes, and changing a plan without destroying trust. Use this to build or fix a comp plan, allocate territories, work out why reps are chasing the wrong deals, or plan a mid-year change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。