「checklist」の検索結果

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete marketing pipeline for apps, dev tools, libraries, and SaaS products in 2026. Generates positioning, listing/ASO/package-SEO assets, press kit, launch plan, social calendar, email sequences, growth/referral strategy, paid playbook, retention, and community plan. Adapts automatically to app vs dev-tool vs SaaS. Trigger on: marketing, launch plan, app launch, go-to-market, ASO, press kit, product hunt launch, hacker news launch, dev tool marketing, growth strategy, launch checklist, marketing plan, distribution plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when we want to turn a just-finished Formax workflow (e.g. commands, overlays, tools, hooks, permissions, UI parity) into a reusable Codex Skill under .codex/skills, including scaffolding, guardrails, and the minimum test checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured persuasion for tech leads, PMs, and founders—not activity logs. Five scenarios (kickoff, status update, wrap-up, investor pitch, solution selling) on one 5-part framework (Hook→Context→Proposal→Evidence→Ask). AI prompts for missing materials and audience context; pre-submit checklist. Claude Code plugin; Cursor, Codex, and chat via prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an instructor asks for a setup guide, adoption guide, planning guide, implementation checklist, prerequisite check, MATLAB Course Designer course structure plan, Common Cartridge workflow, Simulink starter and solution model planning, LMS import plan, or starter prompt for creating a MATLAB and Simulink enabled course with the matlab-generate-course skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design CI/CD pipelines that run test suites. Covers GitHub Actions and GitLab CI templates, parallelism and sharding, artifact management, flaky-test quarantine, test-result publishing, coverage quality gates, OIDC keyless deploy, and copy-paste workflows for Playwright, Jest, and multi-stage pipelines. Use when: "CI/CD," "GitHub Actions," "pipeline," "test in CI," "GitLab CI," "continuous integration," "test automation pipeline," "shard tests in CI." Not for: per-test flaky healing at runtime — use test-reliability; go/no-go release decisions and smoke-test checklists — use release-readiness; test-result dashboards and trend reporting — use qa-metrics. Related: playwright-automation, qa-metrics, test-reliability, coverage-analysis, release-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define release criteria, deployment environments, and rollback strategies during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to plan releases, define deployment criteria, or when user asks "how do we deploy?", "release criteria", "deployment plan", "rollback strategy", "go-live checklist". Outputs DEP- entries with deployment steps and release criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full implementation verification pass after code or data changes. Use when the user asks to verify, QA, smoke test, run checks, validate a feature, inspect a local app in the browser, capture screenshots, or turn discovered QA issues into regression tests/checklists with user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea, a bug, or a batch of unsolved problems into well-structured GitHub issue(s) and file them with `gh`, auto-classifying type + labels from the content (recommend, then confirm) and following Rove's conventions (beginner-friendly framing, concrete file pointers, an acceptance checklist, zero AI/Anthropic attribution). Handles single, batch, and "file the unsolved problems" modes. Use when the user says "file an issue", "open a GitHub issue", "draft a good first issue", "batch these as issues", "上报 issue", "提个 issue", "报个 bug", "把没解决的发上去", or wants to hand low-priority tasks to outside contributors. Distinct from the daemon-owned internal issue store (`rove api issue-*`); this skill is for outward-facing GitHub issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts repeated AI coding-agent workflows into reusable skill packages with triggers, guardrails, examples, and verification checks. Use when a user wants to turn a prompt, checklist, AGENTS.md section, Claude/Codex workflow, or recurring agent task into a portable SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class accessibility design expertise combining the inclusive design principles of Microsoft's Inclusive Design team, the technical rigor of the W3C WCAG working group, and the lived experience perspective of disability advocates. Accessibility is not a feature - it's a fundamental quality attribute that makes products usable by everyone. Great accessibility design is invisible to those who don't need it and essential to those who do. It benefits everyone: captions help in noisy environments, keyboard navigation helps power users, high contrast helps in bright sunlight. When you design for the extremes, you improve the experience for all. Accessibility is not a checklist - it's a mindset that asks "who are we excluding?" at every design decision. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, screen reader, keyboard navigation, color contrast, alt text, aria, focus management, skip link, assistive technology, inclusive design, ada compliance, section 508, accessible, voiceover, nvda, jaws, tab order, focus trap, accessibility, a11y, wcag, inclusive-design, screen-reader, keyboard-navigation, color-contrast, aria, focus-management, assistive-technology" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI Engineering Toolkit workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs 6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a basic accessibility checklist for UI changes. Use when a junior developer needs quick a11y guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land an OpenClaw PR end-to-end using the repo landpr checklist. Use when someone requests “/landpr” or asks to merge/land a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentence-level and section-level craft for instructions Claude will actually follow, in any container — project instructions, a standalone prompt, or skill body text. Use when the text exists or is being drafted and the question is quality: "why is Claude ignoring this instruction", "rewrite this prompt so it works", "improve my project instructions", "make this instruction stick", "is this too prescriptive", "how much structure does Sonnet need versus Opus". Covers imperative construction, positive framing, strategic-versus-procedural calibration per model, extended thinking, complexity scaling, and a quality checklist. For deciding WHICH container the instruction belongs in, use crafting-instructions. For building, testing and packaging a whole skill directory, use creating-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize post-signup onboarding, user activation, first-run experience, or time-to-value. Also use when the user mentions "onboarding flow," "activation rate," "user activation," "first-run experience," "empty states," "onboarding checklist," "aha moment," "new user experience," "users aren't activating," "nobody completes setup," "low activation rate," "users sign up but don't use the product," "time to value," or "first session experience." Use this whenever users are signing up but not sticking around. For ongoing email sequences, see emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create, plan, or optimize a lead magnet for email capture or lead generation. Also use when the user mentions "lead magnet," "gated content," "content upgrade," "downloadable," "ebook," "cheat sheet," "checklist," "template download," "opt-in," "freebie," "PDF download," "resource library," "content offer," "email capture content," "Notion template," "spreadsheet template," or "what should I give away for emails." Use this for planning what to create and how to distribute it. For interactive tools as lead magnets, see free-tools. For writing the actual content, see copywriting. For the email sequence after capture, see emails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'launch checklist,' 'GTM plan,' or 'we're about to ship.' Use this whenever someone is preparing to release something publicly. For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。