「code quality」の検索結果

Run the full R package release gate — regenerate docs, run the test suite, run R CMD check --as-cran, and triage every ERROR / WARNING / NOTE against CRAN policy before a release or submission. Use when the user says "check my R package", "R CMD check", "is this package CRAN-ready", "run devtools::check", "prepare for CRAN submission", or points at a directory containing a DESCRIPTION file. Produces a check report + CRAN-submission checklist in `quality_reports/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, refine, and benchmark agent skills. Use when building a new skill, updating an existing one, running evals, checking trigger quality, or improving a skill description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational Python best practices, idioms, and code quality fundamentals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two pipelines ending at a scanner-look PDF. (1) Phone photos of paper documents (contracts, stamped certificates, receipts, forms, handwritten notes) → clean scanner-quality PDF: perspective rectification + noteshrink whitening + A4 assembly + mandatory whole-document check. Trigger: "把照片 做成扫描件", "photos to scanned PDF", "make this look scanned", "手机拍的 文档转 PDF", "盖章文件扫描", replacing pages in an existing scanned PDF, any CamScanner-like request. (2) A digital document with no signature yet (rendered docx/PDF, confirmation form, contract draft) → make it look hand-signed and scanned: synthesize a handwriting-style signature, composite it onto the signature line, apply the same scan-look post-processing. Trigger: "帮我做个手写签名", "生成签名盖到这份文件上", "做成签过字的扫描件", "synthesize a signature", any request for a document that needs to look signed without a real photographed signature. Do NOT hand-roll levels/contrast enhancement for scan-look — tried and rejected twice; this skill's pipeline is the proven one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests/benchmarks a third-party LLM endpoint (OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible): availability, fidelity, speed, concurrency, protocol compliance, quality regression. Use before hand-rolling a curl loop, when onboarding a provider, or debugging "system prompt 不生效" / a tok/s claim — 测评/压测一个模型或渠道. Not for TTS/voice-clone supplier eval (use the audio skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up QA testing processes: test strategies, Google Testing Standards test cases, P0-P4 bug tracking, quality metrics, progress reports, autonomous execution via master prompts, and OWASP security testing, with third-party QA handoff docs. Use when establishing QA infrastructure, writing test cases, executing test plans, or tracking bugs. Not for auditing an already-rendered UI (use frontend-visual-qa).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate a 4-stage coding discipline framework that forces Claude to plan before coding, isolate changes on a branch, write tests first, and self-review output twice before presenting it. Use when starting a complex coding task, when past Claude sessions produced broken first drafts, or when you want to prevent rework cycles. Produces a confirmed written plan, isolated feature branch, test-first implementation, and a double-reviewed output with a correctness and code-quality checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for continuous autonomous agent loops with quality gates, evals, and recovery controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or refresh the "## Tech debt operations" section in AGENTS.md so a team shares one source of truth for debt-ops disciplines and cached quality commands. Idempotent. Only the managed section changes; other sections are untouched. Invoke explicitly via $init (solo users get the same content from the SessionStart inject).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local SEO analysis covering Google Business Profile optimization, NAP consistency, citation health, review signals, local schema markup, location page quality, multi-location SEO, and industry-specific recommendations. Detects business type (brick-and-mortar, SAB, hybrid) and industry vertical (restaurant, healthcare, legal, home services, real estate, automotive). Use when user says "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP", "map pack", "local pack", "citations", "NAP consistency", "local rankings", "service area", "multi-location", or "local search".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", "single URL", "check this page", "page analysis", or provides a single URL for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local SEO analysis covering Google Business Profile optimization, NAP consistency, citation health, review signals, local schema markup, location page quality, multi-location SEO, and industry-specific recommendations. Detects business type (brick-and-mortar, SAB, hybrid) and industry vertical. Use when user says "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP", "map pack", "local pack", "citations", "NAP consistency", "service area", or "multi-location".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a mod belongs in a modpack — judging mod quality, fit, risk, and pack-value BEFORE download/install. Triggers - "should I add this mod", "is this mod good", "评估这个mod", "这个mod值得装吗", "is this mod worth it", "this mod looks too good to be true", "compare these mods", "does this mod fit my pack". NOT for how to install a mod (use interpreting-mod-author-instructions), load order (writing-bgs-load-order), or conflict resolution (xedit-conflict-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous development with experimental self-correction. Iterates through quality gates until antifragile or blocked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured specifications from electronic component datasheet PDFs — pinouts, electrical characteristics, peripherals, topology, and features. Cache extractions per project for consumption by schematic and PCB analyzers. Primary consumer infrastructure for `kicad`, `emc`, `spice`, and `thermal` analyzers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to extract, verify, or read specs from a component datasheet; when analyzers need verified IC knowledge (EN pin thresholds, PG presence, USB peripheral speed); or when a review mentions datasheet coverage, extraction quality, or per-MPN specifications. Also triggers on "extract this datasheet", "what are the specs for MPN X", "verify datasheet extraction", or "check pin functions for part Y".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when targeting Earth System Science Data (ESSD) or deciding whether an earth-system dataset fits this venue. Encodes the journal's data-paper fit, the open-deposition-with-DOI requirement, quality and reuse-documentation bar, Copernicus house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify tumor neoantigens from somatic variants with pVACtools (pVACseq/pVACfuse/pVACbind/pVACvector/pVACview) for personalized cancer vaccines and checkpoint biomarkers. Encodes the field's hard truth that binding prediction is the easy, near-solved part and single-digit-percent PPV lives downstream — so it centers clonality/CCF, HLA LOH (the silent invalidator), expression, proximal-variant phasing, agretopicity/foreignness quality, and the predicted->presented->immunogenic validation tiers. Use when nominating vaccine targets, ranking neoantigens, or building a tumor-to-candidate pipeline. Binding details in mhc-binding-prediction; ranking in immunogenicity-scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a page or site for organic search, or diagnosing why something isn't ranking: crawl and index signals, on-page elements, content quality, and how to order the fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Loop: find gaps → fix → repeat until agents find no gaps or a metric goal is hit. Shared loop primitive for PVL, EVL, and standalone quality runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodically analyze open pull requests for CI failures, code review feedback, and quality issues, then fix them in batch. Use this skill when the user asks to check PR status, triage CI failures, fix review comments, analyze open PRs, or run a scheduled PR health check across the repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。