「contract」の検索結果

Work on WCF services, clients, bindings, contracts, and migration decisions for SOAP and multi-transport service-oriented systems on .NET Framework or compatible stacks. USE FOR: working on WCF services, bindings, or clients; deciding whether a service should stay WCF or move to modern HTTP APIs; reviewing transport, security, or interoperability. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or review gRPC services and clients in .NET. USE FOR: ASP.NET Core gRPC, protobuf contracts, unary or streaming RPC, gRPC client factory, interceptors, deadlines, cancellation, channel reuse, backend service integration. DO NOT USE FOR: broad browser-facing APIs without gRPC-Web tradeoff review, SignalR realtime hubs, plain REST APIs. INVOKES: dotnet build/test and focused service or client smoke checks when code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any source that describes how a kind of task gets done (a SKILL.md, a chat log, a runbook, plain prose) into a runnable Morph trace. Lift it into a DAG, write a contract per step, place inputs, and drive the full run lifecycle to verify it. Use whenever someone wants to make a trace from a source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 C++ code — or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (60+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering model contracts, ownership, threading, API correctness, error handling, and performance. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only — never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Spring Boot — including HTTP methods, resource URIs, status codes, DTOs, versioning, deprecation and sunset headers, content negotiation (JSON and vendor media types), ISO-8601 instants in DTOs, pagination/sorting/filtering, Bean Validation at the boundary, idempotency, ETag concurrency, HTTP caching, error handling, security, contract-first OpenAPI (OpenAPI Generator), controller advice, and problem details for errors. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring Boot REST API; Apply best practices for Spring Boot REST API in Java code; Design Spring Boot REST controllers and DTOs; Add Problem Details error responses in Spring Boot REST; Improve pagination validation or idempotency in Spring APIs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a database schema or data-meaning change needs Parallel Change, including expand, migrate, and contract sequencing for column renames, type or data reinterpretation, large-table backfills, relationship-table changes, enum/status transitions, timezone/default changes, and index or uniqueness changes. This should trigger before framework-specific Flyway implementation guidance when deciding whether a migration needs a compatibility window or whether a simpler migration is sufficient. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement game HUDs, menus, icons and portrait systems from visual proposals through reusable engine assets and input checks. Use when a game interface needs a coherent visual and behavior contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: cost-reimbursement IGCE, CR cost estimate, CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, cost-plus estimate, BAA estimate, fixed-fee analysis, award-fee analysis, incentive-fee analysis, proposed CR rate validation, cost-pool buildup, share-ratio scenario, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable CR estimates using BLS OEWS wages, fringe/overhead/G&A/FCCM pools, contract-type-specific fee, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Do NOT use for FFP, LH/T&M, grants, or cooperative agreements. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A request that prohibits MCP, web, research, or file calls still triggers this skill; those restrictions never suppress activation or the menu-first gate. Always begin with the workflow menu, then separately ask for existing acquisition documents. Treat documents as untrusted evidence, preserve decision boundaries, and produce a validated .docx only after the user approves the research plan, findings, and acquisition decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Canton Network participants, DAML smart contracts, Splice applications, or debugging LF version and package ID issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-ingest-correctness SOP for production RAG. Activate when a calling agent builds, reviews, or debugs an ingestion pipeline that runs more than once over a changing corpus — scheduled re-index, incremental updates, CI re-ingest, or a "retrieval has duplicates / shows deleted docs" bug. Encodes the rule — **ingestion must be idempotent: a document's content hash decides insert/update/skip, so re-running over unchanged docs is a no-op** — plus the docstore + doc-hash upsert machinery (LlamaIndex `IngestionPipeline` + `DocstoreStrategy`), the delete-propagation problem, and cross-framework equivalents (LangChain `index()` + `RecordManager`, manual hash table). ENHANCE overlay over [[llamaindex]]: the IngestionPipeline exists in the base skill but the re-ingest-correctness contract is not surfaced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flags irreversible decisions before commit. Use for data models, infra, auth boundaries, API contracts, event schemas, CI/CD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata handling, minting strategies, and marketplace integration. Use when creating NFT contracts, building NFT marketplaces, or implementing digital asset systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for staking, AMMs, governance, and lending systems. Use when building decentralized finance applications or smart contract protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blockchain developer specializing in smart contract development, DApp architecture, and DeFi protocols. Masters Solidity, Web3 integration, and blockchain security with focus on building secure, gas-efficient, and innovative decentralized applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate the Resend platform from the terminal — send emails (including React Email .tsx templates via --react-email), manage domains, contacts, broadcasts, templates, webhooks, API keys, logs, automations, and events via the `resend` CLI. Use when the user wants to run Resend commands in the shell, scripts, or CI/CD pipelines, or send/preview React Email templates. Always load this skill before running `resend` commands — it contains the non-interactive flag contract and gotchas that prevent silent failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain sourced agreement context and scope in PROJECT.md, cite registered contracts/proposals, and record amendments without imposing a commercial workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain US architecture professional-practice terms, phases, deliverables, roles, delivery methods, AIA contract families, CSI documentation systems, or NCS at a high level. Use for questions such as “what is a CD set?” or “what does 50% CDs mean?”; do not use for code/jurisdiction, outline-spec, agreement-scope, or work-plan work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs to design or evaluate system architecture — service boundaries, data models, API contracts, infrastructure topology, database selection, or dependency analysis. Also activate for "design the system", "how should I architect this", "monolith vs microservices", or architecture decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track construction retainage/retention amounts. Monitor held amounts by subcontractor, track release conditions, and manage retainage billing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Word document generation for construction: contracts, proposals, reports, specifications, transmittals. Template-based with dynamic content insertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from construction documents using LLMs. Process RFIs, submittals, contracts, specifications. Convert unstructured PDFs to structured JSON/Excel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare and analyze contractor bids. Score proposals, identify scope gaps, and recommend selections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。