3,480 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Provides guidance for automatically evolving and optimizing AI agents across any domain using LLM-driven evolution algorithms. Use when building self-improving agents, optimizing agent prompts and skills against benchmarks, or implementing automated agent evaluation loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements concurrent Go patterns using goroutines and channels, designs and builds microservices with gRPC or REST, optimizes Go application performance with pprof, and enforces idiomatic Go with generics, interfaces, and robust error handling. Use when building Go applications requiring concurrent programming, microservices architecture, or high-performance systems. Invoke for goroutines, channels, Go generics, gRPC integration, CLI tools, benchmarks, or table-driven testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries to identify failure points, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs. Use when investigating errors, analyzing stack traces, finding root causes of unexpected behavior, troubleshooting crashes, or performing log analysis, error investigation, or root cause analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage and operate BrowserWing — an intelligent browser automation platform. Install dependencies, configure LLM, create/manage/execute automation scripts, use AI-driven exploration to generate scripts, browse the script marketplace, and troubleshoot issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and organize your content calendar with AI-driven scheduling and topic suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Required before any hive-browser CLI command. The browser is driven from the terminal by running `hive-browser <command> ... --json` via terminal_exec — not via MCP tools. Teaches the browser lifecycle rules (the bridge attaches to the USER'S running Chrome — never kill or launch browser processes; timeouts are transport issues, not crashes), the screenshot + coordinate workflow (hive-browser interact with a fractional coordinate) that reaches shadow-DOM inputs selectors can't see, the viewport-fraction coordinate rule (not pixels), rich-text editor quirks ("send button stays disabled" failures), and CSP gotchas. Covers Chrome via CDP through the GCU Beeline extension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Required reading whenever any chart_* tool is available. Teaches the one-tool embedding contract (call chart_render → live chart appears in chat AND a downloadable PNG lands in the queen session dir), the ECharts (data viz) vs Mermaid (structural diagrams) decision, the BI/financial-grade aesthetic baseline (no chartjunk, restrained palette, proper typography, single message per chart), and the canonical spec patterns for the 12 most-common chart types. Skipping this leads to 1990s-Excel charts, missing downloads, and the agent writing markdown image links by hand instead of letting chart_render drive the UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end test the polly multi-agent coding orchestrator's critical user journeys (CUJs). Two halves — a deterministic mock-LLM driver (polly_cuj.py) that boots a throwaway local server + mock LLM and asserts the substrate (boot, bridged sys_* tool dispatch, the blast_radius / spawn_bounds / headless_subagent_purpose_guard guardrails, fan-out delegation), and a live real-CLI recipe (real claude/codex/pi, real worktrees/PRs) for polly's actual judgment. Load when developing, testing, or debugging examples/polly — its config.yaml, the claude_code/codex/pi sub-agents, the investigate/fanout/cross-review skills, or the omnigent.inner.nessie.policies guardrails — or reproducing a polly orchestration bug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spin up a live local Omnigent server + runner and exercise the native Pi TUI harness (pi-native) end-to-end — launch the real `pi` CLI via `omnigent pi`, drive turns through the web/bridge, smoke-test, and bug-bash. Load when developing, testing, or debugging the pi-native harness (omnigent/inner/pi_native_executor.py, pi_native_harness.py, omnigent/pi_native.py, pi_native_bridge.py, pi_native_credentials.py) or its bridge / extension / auth / model behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify the Omnigent CLI's setup/onboarding flow, terminal UI/UX, and critical user journeys in a completely isolated, reproducible loop. Drives the real `omnigent` binary through a PTY (pexpect) inside a throwaway OMNIGENT_CONFIG_HOME / OMNIGENT_DATA_DIR sandbox that never touches the user's real ~/.omnigent, captures ANSI-stripped frames for UX inspection, and proves a change is verifiable via a before→fix→after baseline diff. Load when developing or reviewing a CLI setup/onboarding/REPL/picker change (omnigent/cli.py, omnigent/onboarding/*, omnigent/repl/*, scripts/install_oss.sh), reproducing a cold-start/first-run UX bug, or confirming a fix actually lands. Several agents can run it concurrently on separate worktrees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Omnigent load test and produce a results file explaining the latencies. Load when the user wants to load-test / stress-test / benchmark Omnigent under concurrency ("load test omnigent", "stress test the server", "how many hosts/sessions/turns can it handle", "load test real agent turns / conversations", "run a load test"). The test makes each simulated user a real omnigent host that creates host-bound sessions and drives real multi-turn conversations with a mocked LLM; it boots its own local stack (dev/loadtest/run.py). Gather inputs, run it, then read the generated summary.md and explain the latency distribution (avg/median/p95/p99, throughput, failures). NOT for single-request latency micro-benchmarks (that is dev/benchmarks/).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs. new-session composer, terminal strip vs. agent terminal, all twelve native harnesses). Covers the web UI, native harness terminals, and the CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spin up a live local Omnigent server + runner and exercise the native Antigravity (agy) TUI harness (antigravity-native) end-to-end — launch the real `agy` CLI via `omnigent antigravity`, drive turns through the web UI, smoke-test, and bug-bash. Load when developing, testing, or debugging the antigravity-native harness (omnigent/inner/antigravity_native_executor.py, omnigent/antigravity_native.py, antigravity_native_bridge.py, antigravity_native_rpc.py, antigravity_native_reader.py, antigravity_native_launch.py) or its agy launch / RPC mirror / tmux delivery / OAuth / MCP-relay behavior. NOT the in-process `antigravity` Gemini SDK harness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and approve (or reject) pending playbook update proposals from the playbook-monitor agent and apply approved changes to the practice profile. Use when the playbook-monitor agent has surfaced proposals, when the user says "review playbook proposals", "what playbook updates are pending", or wants to step through deviation-driven playbook changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SRE investigator for incidents and debugging. Uses hypothesis-driven methodology and systematic triage. Can query Axiom observability when available. Use for incident response, root cause analysis, production debugging, or log investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a Convex feature works — seed, drive as multiple mocked users via convex-test, assert behavior including the negative authz cases (wrong user refused, data-scope enforced).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and execute a Plannotator release — draft release notes with full contributor credit, bump versions across all package files, build in dependency order, and kick off the tag-driven release pipeline. Use this skill whenever the user mentions preparing a release, bumping versions, writing release notes, tagging a release, or publishing. Also trigger when the user says things like "let's ship", "prep a release", "what's changed since last release", or "time to cut a new version".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gmail attachment download and Google Drive archival with gog.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CCPM - spec-driven project management: PRD → Epic → GitHub Issues → parallel agents → shipped code. Use this skill for anything in the software delivery lifecycle: writing a PRD ('write a PRD for X', 'let's plan X', 'scope this out'), parsing a PRD into an epic, decomposing an epic into tasks, syncing to GitHub ('sync the X epic', 'push tasks to github'), starting work on an issue ('start working on issue N', 'let's work on issue N'), analyzing parallel work streams, running standups ('standup', 'run the standup'), checking status ('what's next', 'what's blocked', 'what are we working on'), closing issues, or merging an epic. Use ccpm any time the user is talking about shipping a feature, managing work, or tracking progress — even if they don't say 'ccpm' or 'PRD'. Do NOT use for: debugging code, writing tests, reviewing PRs, or raw GitHub issue/PR operations with no delivery context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
在实现任何功能或修复 bug 时使用，在编写实现代码之前
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当在当前会话中执行包含独立任务的实现计划时使用
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。