「erd」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "build my brand-safety exclusion lists", "set placement / topic / content exclusions before launch", "add network and audience exclusions", or "prep the A1 brand-safety evidence for the auditor"; produces a placement/network exclusion list, a content-suitability & sensitive-topic block list, an audience/negative-audience exclusion set, and a packaged A1 brand/placement-safety evidence file for the gate. Not for building the audiences you target — use audience-segment-builder; not for computing the RQS or issuing the A1 verdict — use ad-account-auditor. 品牌安全/排除位置/否定受众列表

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements declarative Flutter routing using GoRouter v17 with URL-based navigation, deep linking, and authentication guards. Activates when configuring GoRoute path patterns, setting up StatefulShellRoute for persistent bottom navigation state, implementing ShellRoute for shared nested layouts, adding redirect guards with loop prevention (idempotent redirects), configuring deep links for iOS (FlutterDeepLinkingEnabled) or Android (intent-filters), debugging redirect loops or navigation stack issues, handling 404 error routes with errorBuilder, using named routes with path/query/extra parameters, or migrating from imperative Navigator.push to declarative routing. Ideal for Flutter web apps requiring URL bar synchronization, mobile apps with universal links or app links, or multi-level navigation hierarchies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute production-readiness gates with applicability control, consolidate validation report, and issue final readiness verdict

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate phase validation across code-quality and production-readiness gates with mandatory reporting and verdicting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute ambiguity audit document-by-document with implementer simulation, rubric scoring, cross-layer checks, remediation, and verdicting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report AI token usage and estimated costs. Use when: owner asks about costs today/yesterday/this week, per session, or per model. Shows main session, cron jobs, and subagents. Answers: 'how much did today cost?', 'how much was this session?', 'what was last week's spend?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Schedule meetings, parse meeting notes, extract action items. Three distinct intents covered. Invoke when user mentions a specific meeting (past or future) by name or context. NOT for general calendar checks (use direct calendar.py), NOT for time-zone math. Triggers: "schedule with X", "minutes of the X meeting", "action items from yesterday's meeting", "prep me for meeting with X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY prerequisite — load this skill BEFORE every `generate_diagram` tool call. NEVER call `generate_diagram` directly without loading this skill first. Trigger whenever the user asks to create, generate, draw, render, sketch, or build a diagram — flowchart, architecture diagram, sequence diagram, ERD or entity-relationship diagram, state diagram or state machine, gantt chart, or timeline. Also trigger when the user mentions Mermaid syntax or wants a system architecture, decision tree, dependency graph, API call flow, auth handshake, schema, or pipeline visualized in FigJam. Routes to type-specific guidance, sets universal Mermaid constraints, and tells you when to use a different diagram type or skip the tool entirely (mindmaps, pie charts, class diagrams, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a project for open sourcing: a sanitized fork with secrets and internal references stripped, a sanitizer verdict, README and LICENSE, then a new PRIVATE GitHub repo created and pushed only after GO. The playbook never makes the repo public. Use for "open source this project", "make a sanitized fork", "prepare a public release".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze yesterday's prompts to surface one technical concept worth understanding, delivered as a concise morning lesson with everyday analogy + engineer vocabulary. Use when "morning lesson", "prompt mirror", "today's learning", "what should I learn", or via scheduled automation each morning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A skill for AI agents that want to produce better daily reports and discover more of what their users actually want. Scans source front pages, diffs them against yesterday, prescreens with a weighted profile, reviews with an LLM, deduplicates, publishes, and evolves the profile from user feedback. All decisions go to an append-only tape for audit and replay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with iOS/macOS Keychain Services (SecItem queries, kSecClass, OSStatus errors), biometric authentication (LAContext, Face ID, Touch ID), CryptoKit (AES-GCM, ChaChaPoly, ECDSA, ECDH, HPKE, ML-KEM), Secure Enclave, secure credential storage (OAuth tokens, API keys), certificate pinning (SecTrust, SPKI), keychain sharing across apps/extensions, migrating secrets from UserDefaults or plists, or OWASP MASVS/MASTG mobile compliance on Apple platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Swift Codable models for JSON and property-list encoding and decoding with JSONDecoder, JSONEncoder, CodingKeys, and custom init(from:) or encode(to:). Use when parsing API responses, remapping keys, flattening nested JSON, handling date or data decoding strategies, decoding heterogeneous arrays, or integrating Codable with URLSession, SwiftData, or UserDefaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Use when: (1) "refine this", "make this better", "iterate on this", (2) After /analyst gives a REVISE verdict, (3) Output quality is below 8/10, (4) "run the refinery loop on this". Reads analyst reviews from system/reviews/. Generates, scores, diagnoses, rewrites, re-scores. Stops when all dimensions >= 8/10 or diminishing returns detected. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Scores, diagnoses specific weaknesses, rewrites, re-scores, and repeats until all dimensions reach 8/10 or diminishing returns are detected. Use when you want to refine or iterate on work, after the analyst gives a REVISE verdict, or when output quality is below your bar. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Four-lens review covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance, each scored 1-10. Delivers APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECT verdicts. Use when you need a code review, plan review, quality check, or want to verify work before shipping. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product-research (选品) desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for a cross-border e-commerce seller. The agent sweeps trend sources — Amazon BSR movers, TikTok viral product videos, Temu/AliExpress rising items, Google Trends terms, competitor new launches — and files product candidates with margin cards (landed cost, fees, breakeven ACOS) and competition reads; Kelly verdicts them develop / watch / drop, and develop items become sourcing and listing briefs handed to kelly-listing. Use when the user invokes $kelly-picks or /kelly-picks, or asks for 选品, product research, a product sourcing radar, BSR movers, TikTok viral products, a margin calculator, breakeven ACOS, competition reads, or product candidate triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal finance anomaly review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) that imports the three business tables — orders, invoices, payments/receipts (回款) — from CSV/JSON exports, flags anomalies with deterministic rules, and runs a human review queue with auditable decisions. Use when the user invokes $kelly-audit or /kelly-audit, mentions finance audit, order invoice payment reconciliation, 对账, 应收, 回款, 发票异常, receivables aging, overdue receivables, duplicate payments, missing invoices, amount mismatches, or anomaly review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。