「gap」の検索結果

Interactively pick a quick-win contribution in any GitHub repo — either a labeled issue ("good first issue", "help wanted", docs) or a repo-scan candidate (typo, missing tests, i18n gap, actionable TODO). Runs a TDD dev-loop, opens a PR via gh, and returns the PR URL. Use when the user wants to auto-contribute to an open-source project end-to-end. Trigger words: auto-contribute, open a PR for me, find a good first issue, contribute to <repo>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SE Ranking AI visibility analyst (extension). Tracks AI Share-of-Voice across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode in a single query. Highest-impact new extension per the v2 gap analysis — no other vendor covers all 5 AI platforms in one API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce SEO analysis: Google Shopping visibility, Amazon marketplace intelligence, product schema validation, competitor pricing analysis, and marketplace keyword gaps. Combines on-page product SEO with marketplace data from DataForSEO Merchant API. Use when user says "ecommerce SEO", "product SEO", "Google Shopping", "marketplace SEO", "product schema", "Amazon SEO", "product listings", "shopping ads", or "merchant SEO".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze job postings, calculate match scores, identify gaps, and create application strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured competitive analysis comparing UX patterns, features, strengths, and gaps across rival products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic topic cluster planning and automated execution engine for claude-blog. Performs SERP-based keyword research, groups keywords by search intent and SERP overlap, builds a hub-and-spoke cluster architecture, generates an interactive SVG cluster map, and executes the full cluster by orchestrating blog-write calls with shared cluster context and automatic internal-link injection. Fills the strategy-to-execution gap: blog-strategy plans the blueprint, blog-cluster builds the house. Use when user says "blog cluster", "topic cluster", "content cluster", "cluster plan", "cluster execute", "pillar content", "hub and spoke", "content ecosystem", "cluster map".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any API documentation site by crawling every endpoint page and scoring each one across 5 checks: description quality, OpenAPI spec presence, body param descriptions, response codes, and response schema completeness. Produces a polished interactive HTML report with a summary scorecard, site-wide pattern analysis, ranked top issues, and per-endpoint findings with specific fix guidance. Trigger this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, or check their API docs. Also trigger for: "do the same audit for X", "audit docs.company.com", "check the API docs at X", "run the API docs audit on X", "review the docs for Y API", or pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. Always use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl-score-report workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any SDK documentation site and produces a fully scored, downloadable HTML report. Use this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, score, or check the quality of SDK docs. Also trigger for phrases like "audit the SDK docs at X", "check if the docs at X are complete", "review this SDK documentation", "how good are these docs", "run an SDK audit on X", or any time a user pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. ALWAYS use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl → analyse → cross-reference → report workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SERP-informed outline generation with H2/H3 heading hierarchy, competitive content gap analysis, section-by-section word count targets, chart and image placement markers, FAQ question planning, and internal linking zones. Skeleton only: structure, H2/H3 hierarchy, word counts, FAQ slots. Use blog-brief instead if you need full competitive analysis, statistics research, and image suggestions. Lighter than a full content brief, generates article skeleton and structure only, ready for /blog write to consume. Use when user says "outline", "blog outline", "content outline", "structure blog", "plan sections", "article skeleton", "heading structure", "SERP analysis", "competitive outline", "plan article".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking code against a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate unit tests for untested branches and edge cases. Use when coverage is low, CI flags gaps, or a release needs hardening. Not for integration/E2E suites, framework migrations, or fixing production bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a site for agent readiness via isitagentready.com — for 'make this site agent-ready' or 'scan this site', incl. localhost. Plans the 0-5 gaps and files issues via /plan-to-issues. Not for SEO/llms.txt fixes or app-store ASO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook from a viral X (Twitter) tweet or thread URL. Identifies which of the 10 canonical 2026 X formulas it uses (one-liner contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-tweet, mini-list, relatable cold-open, listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), explains why it worked, and returns a blank template mapped to your topic with its primary goal. Use to learn from a tweet you admire. Not for writing your own (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a long-form X (Twitter) thread (tweetstorm) using a 2026 thread formula (listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap opener, how-I teardown), picked by goal (bookmarks, likes, reposts, replies). Structures tweet 1 as a promise plus open loop, paces one beat per tweet, and closes for the repost. Publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a numbered (1/N) thread. Not for single tweets (use x-post-writer) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about public health policy, cancer prevention, epidemiological study design, clinical risk models, or weight management advice. This skill channels the thinking of Graham A. Colditz, epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis. Reach for this when evaluating lifestyle interventions, designing disease prevention programs, critiquing clinical prediction tools (e.g., AUC vs. clinical utility), or analyzing life-course risk accumulation. Apply his frameworks to bridge the "implementation gap" between scientific knowledge and societal action, prioritizing prevention over treatment and attainable weight maintenance over drastic weight loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Ilya Sutskever (deep learning pioneer, co-founder of OpenAI and Safe Superintelligence Inc.) to problems involving AI architecture, scaling laws, alignment, and research strategy. Reach for this skill whenever discussing machine learning paradigms, the limits of compute and data, AGI timelines, superintelligence safety, or deciding between hardcoding vs. learning. Trigger this skill for questions about next-word prediction, reinforcement learning efficiency, generalization gaps, and transitioning from brute-force scaling to fundamental research, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs skill that prepares a song for sync pitching: scene and emotional angles, a supervisor-facing one-sheet, an exists/missing/unknown asset checklist covering master, instrumental, clean, and stems, screened lyric flags, mood tags, and the open clearance questions kept in their own labeled pile. Use when a track is headed for film, TV, ads, games, trailers, or creator campaigns; when a music supervisor, sync agent, or brand asks what a song is and whether it can be used; or when someone asks for a one-sheet, pitch email, or sync package for a release. Prepares review-ready materials only: never claims clearance, promises placement, or sends outreach. NOT FOR: finding and organizing the rights gaps behind an open clearance question (use suede-rights-audit); building the rights transfer package (use suede-rights-passport); linting the release folder itself (use suede-release-linter); a full rollout campaign (use suede-campaign-in-a-box).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs skill that turns messy creator materials into a local, offline rights-and-provenance transfer package: inventoried and hashed assets, a normalized suede-intake.json manifest, credits and splits, license notes, provenance, and a missing-information report, validated by a bundled stdlib script. Use when a creator needs to hand a song, release, or project to a collaborator, advisor, registry, marketplace, or label; when someone asks for a rights package, intake package, or handoff folder; or when a validated manifest is needed before licensing or royalty-routing review. Carries questions, not answers: building the package clears nothing and uploads nothing. NOT FOR: finding or investigating the rights gaps in the first place (use suede-rights-audit); linting a release folder's files and metadata (use suede-release-linter); a sync one-sheet (use suede-sync-packaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs skill that finds and organizes the rights gaps in a creator project before packaging: ownership, contributors, splits, samples, licenses, provenance, metadata, licensing readiness, and royalty-routing readiness, each marked confirmed or unknown against an evidence trail. Use when a song, release, or creative project needs a rights check before registry, licensing, sync, or payout discussion; when splits, sample clearance, or chain of title are unclear; or when someone asks whether they have the rights to release, license, or get paid for a work. Organizes evidence only: clears no rights, confirms no ownership, moves no money, writes to no registry. NOT FOR: building the transfer package itself (use suede-rights-passport); linting a release folder's files and metadata (use suede-release-linter); a sync one-sheet or pitch (use suede-sync-packaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned marketing attribution discipline. Use when the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions 'attribution,' 'attribution model,' 'first-touch vs last-touch,' 'multi-touch,' 'which channel drives revenue,' 'what's my real CAC,' 'my dashboards disagree,' 'Google/Meta says X but GA says Y,' 'MMM,' 'incrementality,' 'geo lift,' 'holdout test,' 'how did you hear about us,' 'self-reported attribution,' 'dark social,' or wants to instrument attribution themselves, 'stitch my bookings to their source,' 'SavvyCal/Calendly attribution,' 'close the identify gap,' 'track conversions on a third-party domain,' 'first-party attribution.' NOT FOR: general analytics instrumentation and reporting (use suede-analytics) or revenue-ops pipeline work (use suede-revops).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate North American road-trip itineraries as a map-first, offline-friendly single-file HTML page. Plans around daily driving segments, overnight stops, fuel/EV-charging, national-park reservations (Recreation.gov / NPS), seasonal road closures, and timezone/border crossings — for executable, decision-ready trips. Two entry modes: give a start + region/destination + days and it plans the whole route, or hand it an existing route and it verifies, fills gaps, and produces the page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRE Capital Markets and Debt Maturity suite - 8 specialist skills for maturity diagnostics, refinance proceeds gaps, extensions, workouts, rescue capital, term sheet comparison, CMBS special servicing readiness, lender updates, and recap IC memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Job Description 解码器 + Offer 策略系统。把任何 JD 翻译成「这家公司到底在招什么人 / 我的匹配度 / Gap 在哪 / 为什么投/不投 / 面试会问什么 / 下一步怎么走」。只有 3 步：贴 JD → 给简历 → 自动生成并打开一份 HTML Offer Strategy Report。是整个求职链路的入口，向下衔接 Resume Skill 和 BQ Skill。关键词：job description, JD, 职位描述, 匹配度, ATS, resume tailor, 简历定制, 招聘经理, 投不投, should I apply, 面试预测, offer strategy。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。