General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
994 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit datasets, joins, labels, and ground truth before analysis or modeling. Use when data meaning, row grain, time semantics, source-of-truth reliability, or label construction may invalidate conclusions; not for general model evaluation after the evidence base is already trusted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Isolate the root cause of ML performance drops, inconsistent evaluations, prediction errors, and training-serving mismatches across data, labels, splits, pipelines, models, metrics, and runtime behavior. Use when investigating a reproducible failure or regression, not routine model selection or general performance validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish a proposal, offer, or pitch as a tracked link and report back whether it's getting read (view analytics after sending). Use when the user says "send the proposal", "did they open it", "track whether they read it", "share the offer". Not for recurring client reports (use client-reporter) or general research shares (use report-publisher).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the image provider from job shape — text-in-image to Ideogram, photoreal to Flux, illustrative vector to Recraft, general to Gemini/GPT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill immediately whenever a project contains an ACCESSIBILITY.md file, or whenever you are contributing to the mgifford/ACCESSIBILITY.md repository. Absolutely always read ACCESSIBILITY.md before proposing or writing any changes. Under no circumstances skip this skill when an ACCESSIBILITY.md file is present. This skill governs when and how all other accessibility topic skills must be loaded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever the project involves writing, editing, or reviewing content for a general audience, including UI copy, help text, error messages, documentation, and instructions. Under no circumstances use jargon, complex sentence structures, or unexplained acronyms without providing plain alternatives. Absolutely always target a reading level accessible to the broadest possible audience. Load alongside content-design/SKILL.md for all content work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[General] Use when building 3D web apps with ThreeJS and related WebGL or WebGPU examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[General] Use when you need to (re)generate a DERIVED navigation index, cross-capability ERD, or reimplementation guide assembled FROM the canonical Feature Specs under docs/specs/**. Never extracts a separate A-E engineering tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains repo-local action contracts and harness repositories where product CLI and MCP adapters stay thin over core libraries. Use when adopting or improving steward.yaml actions, capability-level adoption evidence, cold-start proof loops, probes, benchmarks, CLI/MCP/core parity, adapter refactors, packages/core boundaries, or sibling harness layout; use repo-quality-system-lifecycle first for general app/library/tool stewardship baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, and integrate generalized validation harnesses across a producer-consumer boundary after a local harness contract exists. Use when refactoring custom validation CLIs/MCPs for large polyrepos, extending Steward across sibling repos, or deploying a local tool to a consumer project for dogfooding and testing; use mcp-harness-repo-maintainer first for initial steward.yaml adoption and cold-start proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or update this Windows computer's fixed third-party Codex helper toolchain when the user requests local helper-tool maintenance. Always show the complete registered list and obtain confirmation for each update group; exclude Codex itself and general runtimes unless explicitly added.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade or synchronize Agent Skills, or determine a Skill's source and ownership across runtimes and roots. Use only for those lifecycle decisions. Do not use for installation, creation or editing, validation, inventory, usage statistics, general audits, cleanup, packaging, publishing, or ordinary file and package work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a HyperFrames composition needs a punch-in, punch-out, zoom, reframe, Ken Burns treatment, camera move, visual match/whip handoff, or other seek-safe 2D/3D keyframes; also for GSAP, CSS keyframes, Anime.js, WAAPI, FLIP, paths, masks, SVG morph/draw, text trails, 3D depth, or `hyperframes keyframes` diagnostics. Don't use for broad scene strategy, brand design, media sourcing, captions, or general video planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author or edit a custom HyperFrames composition when no specialized workflow fits, or when BRIEF.md sets flow: companion. Use for longer or multi-scene pieces, brand and sizzle reels, montages, static loops, static title cards, footage remixes, and freeform builds. Use motion-graphics instead for a short unnarrated motion-first unit, including an animated title. Route fresh creation through hyperframes before using this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and improves task-specific decision artifacts from application requirements and labeled records. Use for data assembly, primitive and base-model selection, fitting, export/reload, inference policy, or bounded data/model/program improvement. Includes rules and no-training outcomes; does not require a rung ladder or training a general Jev.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate general MSX system emulation in EMULATORS, including BIOS-facing behavior, Z80/VDP interrupt wiring, standard I/O ports, PPI 8255 ports
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search an index built for coding agents — GitHub issues, merged pull requests, repository READMEs, and curated documentation sites — and get back the matched passages, not just links. Use this skill whenever the question is about code: how a library, framework, or API behaves, what an error message or stack trace means, whether a bug was reported or fixed, what a function returns, what a default is, or which repos do a given thing. Triggers on "why does <library> do X", "what does this error mean", "is this a known bug", "how do I use <library>", "what's the API for", pasted stack traces, and pasted error strings. Prefer this over a general web search for programming questions — it answers from the primary source instead of a blog post about it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Eterdis Strategy Diagnostic — an AI-guided conversation that helps leadership teams understand their strategic situation before committing to a direction. This is the entry point skill. It runs an open-ended discovery conversation, detects which strategic frameworks are most relevant, and produces a strategy-ready brief. Use this skill when someone asks for a general strategic assessment, when they don't know which framework they need, when they want to "figure out where we stand," or when they're preparing for a strategy engagement. This skill orchestrates other Eterdis skills — it does not replace them. Triggers on: "help me think through our strategy," "where should we start," "we need to figure out what's going on," "strategic health check," "prepare for a strategy review," or any open-ended request for strategic thinking. Based on 20 years of consulting practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct reproducible web searches and decision-oriented research across official sites, search engines, news, papers, forums, social platforms, and public datasets. Use when Codex must investigate a person, organization, product, market, technical resource, reputation, career choice, or other current topic; compare candidates; verify claims; collect dated citations; distinguish facts from inference and anecdote; or write an evidence-backed research report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。