「iter」の検索結果

Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with render_game_to_text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform weak resume bullets into achievement-focused statements with metrics and impact. Use when the user wants to rewrite bullets, strengthen accomplishments, or add action verbs and impact to their resume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create C-suite and VP-level resumes emphasizing strategic leadership, P&L ownership, and board-level impact. Use when the user mentions executive, C-suite, CEO, CFO, CTO, VP, director, or senior leadership resume.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform resume bullets into detailed portfolio case studies with context, action, and outcome. Use when the user mentions portfolio, case study, project write-up, or expanding a resume bullet into a longer narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques. Use when optimizing inference speed (1.5-3.6× speedup), reducing latency for real-time applications, or deploying models with limited compute. Covers draft models, tree-based attention, Jacobi iteration, parallel token generation, and production deployment strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build targeted account or contact lists using Common Room's Prospector. Triggers on 'find companies that match [criteria]', 'build a prospect list', 'find contacts at [type of company]', 'show me companies hiring [role]', or any list-building request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds grant and solicitation opportunities the organization actually qualifies for, runs a hard go/no-go before anyone starts writing, drafts the application or response from past submissions and real program data, and tracks every deadline and reporting obligation that follows an award. Built for nonprofits, government contractors, and education, and it filters daily feeds like SAM.gov or DIBBS down to the handful worth bidding. Runs on Google Drive or M365 with DocuSign and Calendar deepening it, and works from uploaded past submissions plus web research when nothing is connected. Use this whenever a funding or bidding opportunity is in play — including "find grants we qualify for," "should we bid this," "draft the response to this RFP," "we've got 50 solicitations to filter," "what's due on the federal grant," or "help me write the proposal narrative."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Makes sure no inbound lead goes unanswered. Watches web forms, the shared inbox, and the CRM for new inquiries, qualifies each one against the owner's criteria, drafts a reply in the owner's voice with real meeting times for the owner to approve and send, routes anything hot to a human right away, and logs the whole thing to the CRM. Never sends on its own. Built to run on a schedule so overnight inquiries are drafted and sorted by morning, and works from forwarded or pasted inquiries when no connector is available. Use this whenever the owner is worried about inbound leads or response time — including phrasings like "leads are going cold," "did anyone answer that inquiry," "I keep missing form submissions," "nothing falls through the cracks," "handle my inbound," "respond to this lead," or "we lose people because nobody gets back fast enough." Reach for it for a single unanswered inquiry as readily as for a standing setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find leads matching criteria and bulk-add them to an Apollo outreach sequence. Handles enrichment, contact creation, deduplication, and enrollment in one flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up your bio-research environment and explore available tools. Use when first getting oriented with the plugin, checking which literature, drug-discovery, or visualization MCP servers are connected, or surveying available analysis skills before starting a new project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts. BOOTSTRAP MODE - Triggers: "Create a data context skill", "Set up data analysis for our warehouse", "Help me create a skill for our database", "Generate a data skill for [company]" → Discovers schemas, asks key questions, generates initial skill with reference files ITERATION MODE - Triggers: "Add context about [domain]", "The skill needs more info about [topic]", "Update the data skill with [metrics/tables/terminology]", "Improve the [domain] reference" → Loads existing skill, asks targeted questions, appends/updates reference files Use when data analysts want Claude to understand their company's specific data warehouse, terminology, metrics definitions, and common query patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit any video by conversation. Transcribe, cut, color grade, generate overlay animations, burn subtitles — for talking heads, montages, tutorials, travel, interviews. No presets, no menus. Ask questions, confirm the plan, execute, iterate, persist. Production-correctness rules are hard; everything else is artistic freedom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal quality bar and final audit rubric for any agent system prompt. Activate this whenever you are unsure which archetype skill applies, or as a final review pass before writing the system prompt. It defines the required run contract, completion criteria, fallback paths, response format, and anti-patterns every produced agent prompt must satisfy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use early when debugging a medium or hard bug, especially when tests alone may not reveal the real runtime failure. Trigger this before extended TDD iteration when a bug involves runtime state, ordering, persistence, streaming, concurrency, UI/manual reproduction, external services, or when a red or newly passing test may not model the real issue. Skip only when the root cause is already directly proven by a stack trace or deterministic test that exercises the real runtime path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoring playbook for building agents that draft written content — blog posts, marketing copy, social media posts, newsletters, product descriptions, landing pages, or ad copy. Use this when the user wants an agent that writes, drafts, or rewrites text for publication or marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fallback authoring playbook for building general-purpose personal assistant agents that do not fit a more specific archetype. Use this only after checking the other archetype skills (coding, spreadsheet, research, customer-support, content-writer, ops-automation). Examples include summarizing emails, drafting short answers, capturing notes, or generic personal-helper agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end workflow for implementing a non-trivial qwen-code feature. Covers requirements investigation, design, E2E test planning, baseline dry-run, implementation, verification, self-audit, code review, and iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate a small team of Qwen Code teammates with enforced read-only workers, an optional worktree-pinned writer, shared tasks, peer messages, and existing Agent View tabs. Invoke explicitly with /coordinate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a Codex or Claude Code feature has been implemented in Qwen Code to run the selected reference agent and Qwen Code under the same scenario, capture HTTP and terminal traces, compare request bodies, tool/function schemas, outputs, and iterate until the reproduced behavior is close enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing upstream market-research methodology — sizing a market as TAM/SAM/SOM computed BOTH top-down and bottoms-up (never a single unsourced number), planning a survey sample size with finite-population correction and per-segment minimums, or scoring candidate market segments against Kotler's measurable/substantial/accessible/differentiable/actionable criteria. Outputs always show the method and the assumptions. For market-research analysts and product-marketing at the sizing/survey/segmentation moment. Distinct from marketing-skill (campaign analytics, attribution, demand-gen) — this is the evidence-building methodology, not live-campaign optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to prepare for SOC 2 audits, map Trust Service Criteria, build control matrices, collect audit evidence, perform gap analysis, or assess SOC 2 Type I vs Type II readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write specs before code, define acceptance criteria, plan features before implementation, generate tests from specifications, or follow spec-first development practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。