1,146 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Turn meeting notes, transcripts, or rough bullets into decisions, action items, owners, due dates, and follow-up queues. Use when the work is repetitive meeting cleanup or recap writing. Do not use for negotiation strategy, legal advice, or executive decision framing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write balanced, evidence-based performance reviews for employees. Covers achievements, development areas, and goal setting using the SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) feedback model. Produces reviews that are fair, legally defensible, and growth-oriented. Use during annual or semi-annual review cycles. Do not use for disciplinary actions, PIPs, or compensation calculations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft clear, professional business emails from rough notes, context, or instructions. Handles cold outreach, internal updates, client responses, and escalation drafts. Use when the work is routine email writing with known context and audience. Do not use for sensitive legal notices, formal regulatory correspondence, or board-level communication without review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze budget-versus-actual or forecast-versus-actual performance and turn finance data into a management-ready narrative using variance logic, drivers, cash impact, and forward actions. Use when finance, FP&A, or business leaders need commentary, management accounts, or performance explanation. Do not use for bookkeeping entries, tax filing preparation, or legal accounting sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft concise follow-up messages, nudges, reminders, and recap emails from open decisions, stale requests, or recent meetings. Use when the work is repetitive business writing with known context. Do not use for sensitive legal language, high-stakes negotiation, or board-level communication without review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft commercial contracts from scratch by contract type — NDAs, service agreements, vendor contracts, employment agreements, and licensing deals. Follow a clause library approach with risk-balanced terms. Use when creating new contracts. Do not replace legal counsel sign-off on finalized agreements. For reviewing existing contracts, use contract-risk-review instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare policies, procedures, onboarding files, or operating evidence against a named compliance framework such as AML/KYC, privacy, internal controls, or audit readiness. Use when a team needs a gap matrix, control checklist, remediation priorities, or evidence request list. Do not use when no target framework is specified or when formal legal or regulatory sign-off is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authorized offensive security skill for ethical penetration testing, red-team planning, vulnerability validation, reconnaissance of owned assets, web/API/mobile/cloud assessment, report writing, remediation guidance, and lab-based security testing. Use only for systems the user owns or is authorized to test; focus on safe, scoped, legal assessment and defensive improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs. Use this skill when testing REST APIs or application forms that directly map user-supplied JSON or POST input to internal database objects. An attacker can inject undocumented variables (e.g., `is_admin`, `verified`) to illegally modify restricted properties.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end AI website generation pipeline. Claude Opus 4.8 emits Bolt-style <boltArtifact> envelopes (multi-file, plan-first) that customize Vite+React+Tailwind templates from pre-researched business data. Pre-research via APIs, media acquisition, brand extraction, visual inspection via GPT Image 2 vision, R2 upload (per-file content-type by extension), D1 status updates. Supports all business types: SaaS, portfolio, non-profit, restaurant, salon, medical, legal, retail, tech.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract real brands (Wayback for rebuilds). Copy system, headline/CTA rules, trust surfaces, legal pages, SEO+structured data, anti-AI-slop, microcopy, DESIGN.md, W3C DTCG tokens, pSEO 5 types, GEO/AI search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote placement — full formatted \footnote{} or OOXML footnotes for legal and notes styles (Bluebook, OSCOLA, Chicago, APA, McGill) with Id./supra short forms; (3) restyle — convert existing footnote citations from one style to another. This skill is manual-invoke ONLY — trigger ONLY when the user explicitly runs /cite-placement or explicitly names the "cite-placement" skill. Do NOT auto-trigger on general citation, footnote, or reference requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete launch readiness validation covering every department: code, content, store, marketing, community, infrastructure, legal, and go/no-go sign-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a customer referral program (who may accept the reward, how the introduction is made), designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for an early-stage startup where the founder is still doing the selling — running founder-led sales, setting up a design-partner program, judging whether you have product-market fit, deciding what not to do yet, deciding when to hire the first AE or first marketer, and moving upmarket to larger buyers. Also use it when your company has just acquired another (or is about to), to plan the marketing integration: what you may and may not do between signing and close, the first letter to the acquired customers, whether to keep, endorse, fold in or retire the acquired brand, merging the two marketing databases without mailing people who opted out, when to start cross-selling, and announcing a product sunset. Also use it to design a demand-generation campaign and the channel plan it runs on: one campaign with one job, the offer for buyers who are and are not in market, what each channel is for, the kill and scale rules set before launch, the follow-up sales agrees to, the yearly calendar of always-on programs and tentpole campaigns, and which channels to keep, test or stop. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: founder-led sales, founder-led GTM, design partners, design partner agreement, first customers, first 10 customers, do we have product-market fit, PMF, Sean Ellis test, very disappointed survey, pre-seed, seed stage, when to hire our first AE, first sales hire, first marketing hire, moving upmarket, going upmarket, enterprise readiness, first enterprise deal, what do enterprise buyers need before they sign, positioning, product launch, beta program, early access program, design partners, private preview, public preview, general availability, GA launch, when can we call it GA, can sales sell a beta feature, selling the roadmap, launch tier, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, ideal customer profile, ICP, what is our real ICP, who actually buys from us, refresh our ICP from closed-won deals, ICP refresh before planning, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget. Also triggers on public-sector marketing: sell to government, government marketing, public sector go-to-market, federal marketing, state and local government, SLED, FedRAMP, FedRAMP marketing claims, can we say FedRAMP ready, GovRAMP, StateRAMP, VPAT, accessibility confor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Client reporting, quality assurance, and financial operations management. Handles KPI frameworks, compliance audits, budget tracking, and launch checklists. Use when: managing client dashboards, ensuring brand compliance, conducting QA reviews, tracking marketing spend, ensuring GDPR/CAN-SPAM compliance, handling a request to delete someone's data across the marketing stack, deciding whether an AI voice or AI presenter has to be disclosed, proofreading deliverables. Also triggers on: client reporting, QA, quality assurance, brand compliance, marketing budget, financial tracking, legal compliance, GDPR, CAN-SPAM, proofreading, launch checklist, right to erasure, right to be forgotten, data deletion request, DSAR, someone asked us to delete their data, do we delete or suppress, suppression list, they unsubscribed and we emailed them again, we deleted them and they came back, restored a backup and re-emailed people, custom audience still has deleted contacts, California Delete Act, DROP, data broker deletion, enrichment records disappearing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an EMT (Basic Life Support tier) — deciding whether a chest-pain patient gets aspirin under protocol, dosing an epinephrine auto-injector for anaphylaxis and knowing when to repeat it, applying spinal-motion-restriction criteria instead of routine backboarding, recognizing the moment a call exceeds BLS scope and requesting ALS intercept, or working a patient refusal (AMA) to a legally defensible conclusion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Document Management Specialist — designing or auditing a records retention schedule, planning a content migration between DMS platforms (SharePoint, OpenText, Documentum, M-Files), reconciling migrated vs. source document counts, resolving a version-control or legal-hold conflict, or scoping a defensible-disposal (ROT) cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Coroner or medicolegal death investigator — determining whether a death is reportable/jurisdictional, distinguishing cause of death from manner of death, estimating a postmortem interval from scene findings, deciding whether an autopsy or toxicology screen is warranted, or completing a death certificate under scrutiny.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a commercial pilot — computing density-altitude-adjusted takeoff/landing distance against runway available, checking weight-and-balance CG against the envelope (not just gross weight), deciding an IFR/VFR go/no-go against personal minimums instead of legal minimums, interpreting a METAR/TAF (TEMPO/PROB groups, 1-2-3 alternate rule) for a go decision, or setting divert/turn-back triggers before a flight departs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Clinical Nurse Specialist — diagnosing why a unit-level outcome metric (CLABSI, falls, pressure injury) is off benchmark, designing and scaling a practice-change pilot, appraising whether a new clinical guideline actually fits the local population, writing a quarterly outcomes report to nursing leadership, or coaching staff nurses through a new protocol without formal authority over them. US hospital/health-system default; state nurse practice acts vary. A reasoning aid, not clinical or legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a courier or messenger — sequencing a multi-stop route against hard delivery windows, deciding what proof-of-delivery a shipment requires, handling a chain-of-custody transfer for a legal or medical item, or resolving a refused-delivery/no-answer exception against the sender's fallback instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a climate change policy analyst — evaluating a proposed emissions rule's cost-benefit case, comparing carbon-pricing instruments (tax vs. cap-and-trade), drafting regulatory comment letters or legislative issue briefs, or assessing whether a climate proposal survives legal/political feasibility review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of clergy or a pastoral-care leader — triaging a pastoral-counseling disclosure against a referral to licensed mental-health or medical care, mediating a congregational conflict, navigating clergy-privilege/confidentiality boundaries, planning an officiated ceremony with legal requirements, or right-sizing a volunteer program against committed capacity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。