「progress」の検索結果

Resolves an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict: reads conflict state, recovers each side's intent, resolves hunks, runs checks. NOT for the ship pipeline (mk:ship); NOT for bug debugging (mk:fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persists and restores mid-session workflow progress across context resets. Use when resuming workflows, saving state, or handling context compaction. Triggers on: handoff, save state, resume workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan, one question at a time, until shared understanding. Checkpoints answers so progress survives a reset. Do NOT use to propose solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persists and restores mid-session workflow progress across context resets. Use when resuming workflows, saving state, or handling context compaction. Triggers on: handoff, save state, resume workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict end to end: read the conflict state, recover each side's original intent, resolve every hunk, run the project's checks, and prepare the merge/rebase for an explicitly approved finish. Use when asked to "resolve merge conflicts", "fix this rebase", "finish the merge", or when `git status` shows conflicted (unmerged) paths. NOT for the full ship pipeline that merges the base branch first (see mk:ship); NOT for debugging a runtime bug or test failure unrelated to a conflict (see mk:investigate / mk:fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern for progressively refining context retrieval to solve the subagent context problem

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

남은 작업과 다음 작업 선정. .progress/.docs/현재 git 상태 기반 우선순위 정리

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find web sources with query-relevant page excerpts and optional full-page content, and discover workflows, data APIs, and indexes. Use for web research or finding structured records, listings, transcripts, and datasets. Supports semantic tool discovery, domain matching, and progressive catalogue browsing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a plan phase into a PhaseSpec v1 and dispatches it to a specialist subagent via the Agent tool. Subagent reads files itself, returns a structured result, the result is logged into progress.md. Markdown is the shared state; no in-memory shared store across agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

xAI Grok Imagine API integration for image generation, text-to-video, image-to-video, and editing via natural language. Use when you need to generate images or videos from text prompts, edit existing images, animate static images into videos, or edit existing videos with natural language instructions. Supports conversational generation across messaging platforms with async polling, progress updates, and automatic delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing the `Idempotency-Key` HTTP header pattern (Stripe-pioneered, IETF-standardizing) so retries don't double-charge or duplicate side effects — full Postgres schema with recovery-point state machine, fingerprint check, in-progress lock with 409 response, and 24h retention. Grounded in Stripe blog/docs, the IETF httpapi WG draft, and Brandur Leach's canonical implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce people to AI, agentic AI, and AI skills with appropriate pedagogy for any audience. Covers LLM analogies, progressive complexity paths, aha-moment demos, audience-tailored explanations, workshop design, and overcoming emotional barriers to AI adoption. Activate on 'explain AI', 'introduce AI', 'AI workshop', 'AI demo', 'teach AI', 'AI literacy', 'onboard to AI', 'AI evangelism', 'explain agentic', 'explain skills to', 'AI training session', 'AI onboarding'. NOT for teaching ML engineering (use ai-engineer), not for building AI features (use ai-engineer), not for prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer), not for building training data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill recommends using radiation therapy for corticotroph adenomas in Cushing's disease when imaging shows invasive features or mass‑effect concerns such as cavernous sinus invasion, suprasellar extension, or knobby protrusion. Consider RT when postoperative medical therapy has normalized cortisol but tumor progression or residual invasive disease is suspected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new agent skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, or build a new skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mark a rolling-wave slice done on explicit user authority, regardless of its current lifecycle status or missing implementation, finalization, review, verification, or child-project state. Use when the user says a slice is done, complete, finished, accepted, or should be marked done; capture available material learnings, update project state, and output roadmap progress without requiring earlier workflow steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a short executive summary for the current rolling-wave project. Use when the user wants a concise status update, investor/team-friendly summary, leadership summary, project progress snapshot, or TL;DR of completed slices, the current slice plan, and upcoming slices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a ready rolling-wave slice without locking it down with broad tests yet. Use when the user explicitly wants to code the current docs/rolling-wave/{project}/slices/NNN-slug.md slice, mark it in progress while working, implement small or cohesive work in the main context by default, use one to three gpt-5.6-terra workers only for genuine parallel chunks or large discovery/mechanical work where delegation pays for its handoff cost, pause or hand off chunks marked human-fit when appropriate, record implementation notes and final-test backlog, preserve the original slice contract, and mark completed implementation ready for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to drive a research question (RQ) end-to-end: validate the RQ README, generate a fill batch-plan, start the Docker batch in the background, monitor progress, run aggregation, and propose findings updates. Trigger when the user says "RQ-N voranbringen", "run-rq", "fill RQ-N", "run RQ-N", "Forschungsfrage N starten", or names a specific RQ-N directory in research/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to resolve an in-progress git merge/rebase conflict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。