「que」の検索結果

Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what's the architecture / which subsystems exist?", "what's the impact of changing this?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what is the architecture / which subsystems exist?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ktx's semantic layer - a structured catalog of sources (tables/views), measures, joins, and segments expressed as YAML. Covers the schema and how to query it via `sl_query`. Use when the task involves querying pre-defined metrics (ARR, churn, retention, LTV, MAU) or reading SL source YAML to understand the catalog. Capture is handled by the `sl_capture` skill (memory-agent only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering a question that needs data from a ktx-connected database - investigating, analyzing, "how many", "show me", "what's the breakdown of", finding records by value, exploring tables, comparing periods, explaining metrics, or any data-analysis request. Triggers even when the user does not say "analytics"; if the answer requires querying a configured ktx connection, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a meta-agent request is too ambiguous to safely generate, package, publish, or adapt without one to five targeted questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration; connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work, generic agent creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and analyze data in Azure Data Explorer (Kusto/ADX) using KQL for log analytics, telemetry, and time series analysis. WHEN: KQL queries, Kusto database queries, Azure Data Explorer, ADX clusters, log analytics, time series data, IoT telemetry, anomaly detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Storage Services including Blob Storage, File Shares, Queue Storage, Table Storage, and Data Lake. Answers questions about storage access tiers (hot, cool, cold, archive), when to use each tier, and tier comparison. Provides object storage, SMB file shares, async messaging, NoSQL key-value, and big data analytics. Includes lifecycle management. USE FOR: blob storage, file shares, queue storage, table storage, data lake, upload files, download blobs, storage accounts, access tiers, storage tiers, hot cool cold archive, storage tier comparison, when to use storage tiers, lifecycle management, Azure Storage concepts. DO NOT USE FOR: SQL databases, Cosmos DB (use azure-prepare), messaging with Event Hubs or Service Bus (use azure-messaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage inbound journalist source queries and draft a response only when the user's expertise is a real fit. Runs each query through proven source-request lenses (4-gate fit triage, credential-standing test, deadline read, BLUF/inverted-pyramid drafting), kills weak fits, asks for missing proof, and never auto-sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start and control Minutes Coach, the separate real-time copilot HUD, with an explicit meeting goal. Use only for explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests such as "start Minutes Coach", "open the Coach HUD", "pause Minutes Coach", "resume Minutes Coach", "Minutes Coach status", or "stop Minutes Coach". Do not use for requests that explicitly ask the current terminal agent to watch or strategize; those belong to minutes-live-sidekick. An ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification and must not automatically start Coach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build traceable internal-review proposal, RFI, RFP, tender, bid, and questionnaire responses from supplied questions and approved sources. Use to analyze questions, contribute business or product evidence, or draft qualified responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Roblox physical simulation and queries with assemblies, anchoring, constraints, collision groups, CanCollide/CanTouch/CanQuery, raycasts and overlap queries, mass, impulses, forces, velocity, moving assemblies, cleanup, and network ownership. Use for Roblox collisions, hit detection, RaycastParams, PhysicsService, projectiles, vehicles, knockback, constraints, deprecated BodyMovers, unstable motion, or client-owned physics exploits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, approve, request changes on, or reject pending wiki edit drafts in Arkon. Requires editor or admin role. Triggers on: review drafts, pending reviews, check draft queue, approve draft, reject draft, request changes, send draft back, review wiki changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a construction request for information so the site can act on it — a direct answer, the drawing or specification reference that supports it, and an explicit statement of whether it changes cost or programme. Use when asked to respond to an RFI, answer a contractor query, or handle a request for information on site, or when RFIs keep coming back for clarification. Produces the answer with its reference, the cost and time implication stated, the instruction status, the distribution list, and the register entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a tailored code review checklist for any pull request based on the language, type of change, and risk level. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, review a pull request, or generate a code review checklist. Produces a focused checklist with language-specific checks, risk-level-appropriate depth, and a clear approve/request-changes recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a polite-but-firm payment-reminder / collections email sequence for overdue invoices. Use when asked to write a collections email, a payment reminder, a dunning sequence, or to chase an overdue invoice. Produces a staged sequence — gentle pre-due nudge through escalating overdue reminders to a final notice — that stays professional, keeps the relationship intact, and makes paying easy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practise the structured interview (结构化面试) for Chinese civil service and public institution posts (公务员面试 / 事业单位面试): the common question types, a clear answer structure for each, timed mock rounds and feedback on content, structure and delivery. Use when asked 公务员面试怎么准备, 结构化面试题, 帮我模拟面试, 综合分析题怎么答, 应急应变题, or practise the civil service interview. Produces a question-type guide, answer frameworks with worked examples, a timed mock interview asked one question at a time, scored feedback, and a practice plan up to the interview date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user with sharp, one-at-a-time questions to turn a vague request into a tight, complete brief any other skill can run on. Use when a request is fuzzy, under-specified, or 'help me think this through', or before running a skill that needs inputs the user hasn't given. Produces a structured brief (goal, audience, constraints, success criteria) and hands off to the right skill — by interrogating, not guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read Lemon Squeezy revenue: list orders, subscriptions, customers, products; create checkout links. Trigger phrases: lemon squeezy, store orders, revenue, checkout link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email campaign/sequence performance review composite. Pulls campaign data (sends, opens, replies, bounces), reads actual email copy and subject lines, analyzes reply content (objections, positive interest, questions), and produces a diagnostic report covering quantitative metrics, copy quality, lead quality, and actionable recommendations. Tool-agnostic — works with Smartlead (MCP), Instantly, Outreach, Lemlist, Apollo, or CSV data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For churned accounts, research what has changed since they left — new funding, team growth, competitor dissatisfaction, product updates that address their pain — then assess re-engagement potential and generate a personalized win-back email sequence with timing recommendations. Chains web research and LinkedIn monitoring with email sequence generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers natural-language business questions over existing Power BI reports and semantic models through the FabricIQ MCP endpoint, discovering artifacts, resolving entities, generating the DAX itself, and returning a plain-language answer. Use when the user asks a data question, including one that says to query the model directly. For DAX the user supplies, or measures to save, use semantic-model-authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。