「questions」の検索結果

Use GitHub Copilot CLI in non-interactive mode to ask questions, review code, or generate snippets without manual interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临考复习教练 / Exam cram coach. 学生给一个课程资料文件夹（课件 PDF/PPTX/DOCX/笔记/作业/答案/真题/往年卷），它按章节讲解并标出处、把讲义和题目里的图裁出来展示、只用资料里的题考试判分、记错题和笔记、按天排复习计划、做小抄，并标明每句话是否来自资料。触发词：期末、期中、考试、备考、复习、突击、刷题、真题、作业讲解、错题本、划重点、小抄、复习计划、考研、考证、课件讲解、讲义。Use when a student wants to prepare for a final, midterm or any exam from their own course files: teach chapter by chapter with page citations and the figures cropped from the materials, quiz only from the homework and past papers, keep progress, mistakes and notes across chats, plan the remaining days, build a cheat sheet, and label what comes from the materials. Triggers: exam prep, cram, revise, study for the test, lecture slides, homework solutions, past papers, practice questions, quiz me, mistake log, cheat sheet, study plan, study guide, flashcards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or revise Godot UI from an approved design, separated art, or a visual reference when scene structure, gameplay binding, and runtime visual verification all matter. Use for complete Godot UI integration; use ordinary Godot UI guidance for isolated node or layout questions that do not require an end-to-end visual workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and develops specs following the spec-driven method. Asks clarifying questions before proposing structure, and builds the spec section by section. Use it when starting a large feature, before writing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for ALL work requests - triages scope from trivial to massive, asks clarifying questions, and routes to appropriate planning skills. Use this when receiving any new work request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-first content creation optimized for both human readers and AI search engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Creates authentic, authoritative content that becomes the go-to citation source for AI models answering user questions. Use this skill when: - Creating content that should appear in AI search results (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude) - Building topical authority to become THE source AI cites for a topic - Launching a new product and need compelling, citable content - Creating blog posts, articles, social media, or press releases - Need content that references real trends, people, and recent events - Want AI-assisted content that doesn't sound AI-generated - Creating thought leadership content in any industry Triggers: "create content for", "write about", "research and write", "find experts for", "content for launch", "blog post about", "article on", "press release for", "AI search", "show up in AI", "Perplexity", "be cited by AI"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Pieter Abbeel, robotics and reinforcement learning expert, UC Berkeley professor, and co-founder of Covariant. Use this skill whenever you are designing AI systems, tackling Sim2Real transfer, deploying machine learning in the physical world, or evaluating reinforcement learning architectures. Trigger this skill for questions about domain randomization, reward design, bootstrapping real-world AI, robotics hardware assumptions, or shifting from hard-coded rules to data-driven deep learning. It helps ground theoretical AI in physical embodiment and pragmatic deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Ilya Sutskever (deep learning pioneer, co-founder of OpenAI and Safe Superintelligence Inc.) to problems involving AI architecture, scaling laws, alignment, and research strategy. Reach for this skill whenever discussing machine learning paradigms, the limits of compute and data, AGI timelines, superintelligence safety, or deciding between hardcoding vs. learning. Trigger this skill for questions about next-word prediction, reinforcement learning efficiency, generalization gaps, and transitioning from brute-force scaling to fundamental research, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning, architectural principles, and AI philosophy of Christopher Manning (natural language processing expert, Stanford University, director of Stanford AI Lab). Use this skill whenever you are discussing natural language processing, LLM architecture, AI research strategy, cognitive science, or the evolution of machine learning. Trigger this skill for questions about AGI timelines, academic vs. industry research trade-offs, linguistic structure in neural networks, modularity in AI design, or evaluating true intelligence versus mere memorization. Channel his pragmatic focus on domain science, adaptability, and competing on ideas rather than raw compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize document text and identify its main claims, evidence, and unanswered questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user's task involves Ant Design (antd) — writing antd components, debugging antd issues, querying antd APIs/props/tokens/demos, migrating between antd versions, or analyzing antd usage in a project. Triggers on antd-related code, imports from 'antd', or explicit antd questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about a GRACE 4 project by navigating .grace current-state artifacts and file-local semantic markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate natural-language requirements or structured specification documents into formal temporal logic properties (LTL, CTL, safety/liveness properties). Use when users need to formalize requirements for model checking, formal verification, or property specification. Handles embedded/real-time systems, hardware verification, concurrent systems, and reactive systems. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions when needed, and outputs machine-checkable formulas with explanations. Supports multiple output formats (SPIN, NuSMV, Uppaal, TLA+, Maude).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically derives TLA+ properties (invariants, safety, liveness) from natural-language requirements or structured requirement documents. Resolves ambiguities, asks clarifying questions for underspecified requirements, and outputs TLA+-compatible property definitions with semantic explanations. Use when translating system requirements, specifications, or behavioral constraints into formal TLA+ temporal logic properties for verification with TLC model checker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively enhance user requirements into clear, complete, actionable specifications through analysis and clarification. Use when: (1) Users provide initial requirements that need refinement, (2) Requirements are vague, incomplete, or ambiguous, (3) Creating formal specifications from informal descriptions, (4) Identifying missing constraints, edge cases, or acceptance criteria, (5) Clarifying assumptions and implicit dependencies, or (6) Preparing requirements for design, implementation, or verification. Operates interactively: analyze → ask clarifying questions → refine based on responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. Classifies open items, answers questions from codebase, analyzes bugs, reviews PRs, and produces a structured triage report. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。