「refactor」の検索結果

Applies Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard to a target you already have — a file on disk, text pasted into the prompt, or a draft already produced in the conversation — by dispatching the readability-editor to rewrite its prose so the main point comes first, headings are descriptive, each paragraph carries one idea, and sentences stay short and active, while preserving every fact. Use when you want to make a document or draft readable, edit or polish prose for readability, clean up writing, tighten wording, or re-apply the readability standard to something already written. Rewrites prose only, leaving code, diagrams, and citation identifiers unchanged. Does not write new feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not restructure code or review it — use refactor to restructure code and code-review to audit it. Does not judge the underlying work or raise findings; it only rewrites the writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance playbook distilled from Vercel Engineering guidance. Use when building, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code for waterfalls, bundle size, rendering cost, and client/server data flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, building, designing, code review, refactor, fixing, improving, optimizing, enhancing, or checking UI/UX work. Covers product patterns, landing pages, chart choices, visual styles, palettes, typography, UX rules, and 9 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui). Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design architecture foundations before implementation. Use when asked to design or refactor architecture, choose Rust/Go crate, package, module, runtime, workflow, or service boundaries, compare mature project architecture, prevent stacked one-off PRs, audit migration debt in existing repos, or produce a spec before coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides clean architecture design with strict 200-line file limits. Use when starting new features, refactoring large files, or planning module structure. Enforces modular design and real testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, audit, or refactor web and game-adjacent interfaces using an evidence-based Hypergryph visual language with two independent choices: product family and application depth (1 minimal, 2 moderate, 3 complex, 4 maximal). Use for Hypergryph-, Arknights-, Endfield-, Rhodes Island-, industrial sci-fi-, editorial game-UI-, or bilingual technical-interface requests; for landing pages, dashboards, menus, HUD-like panels, design systems, HTML/CSS/JS/React components, and visual QA where the result should carry this family resemblance without copying protected logos or artwork.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting or picking up a non-trivial effort (feature, investigation, perf probe, refactor, migration) in a shared repo where teammates or future agents must coordinate or hand off; when a repo has no durable in-tree record of decisions and dead-ends; when you're about to drop a well-measured negative result; or when bootstrapping a journal from a repo's commit history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Andrej Karpathy-inspired coding-agent guidelines in Codex. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring code to surface assumptions, avoid overengineering, keep edits surgical, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, inspect, audit, and refactor Blender Geometry Nodes systems for procedural models, instancing, modular effects, curves, scattering, flocks, data visualization, fields, simulation zones, and node-graph cleanup. Use whenever a Blender task specifically calls for Geometry Nodes, reusable procedural node graphs, node connections/layout, or a scalable procedural asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and analyze areas with high maintenance cost, poor design, or accumulated technical debt. Use this skill when reviewing codebases for quality issues, planning refactoring efforts, conducting code audits, assessing project health, identifying maintenance hotspots, or prioritizing technical improvements. Analyzes code smells, architectural issues, dependency problems, test quality, documentation gaps, and provides actionable recommendations with priority rankings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates regression tests for Python codebases by analyzing changes between old and new code versions and their existing tests. Migrates tests to work with new code, generates tests for new functionality, and creates mocks for external dependencies. Supports unittest and pytest frameworks. Use when refactoring code, adding features, or ensuring backward compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify bug-introducing commits using semantic analysis that extends traditional SZZ algorithm. Distinguishes semantic changes from refactorings or code movements using control-flow and data-flow similarity analysis. Use when analyzing bug-fix commits to trace back to bug-introducing changes, investigating software evolution, conducting empirical studies on defect prediction, or reducing false positives in bug localization. Supports git repositories and provides explanations for why commits are identified as bug-introducing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes and verifies semantic equivalence between two functions, classes, or modules by examining control flow, data flow, and observable behavior. Use when comparing code implementations (refactored vs original, different implementations of same functionality, migration verification), determining if two code artifacts produce identical behavior, identifying behavioral differences between code versions, or validating that code changes preserve semantics. Supports formal reasoning and symbolic execution approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces comprehensive summaries and insights about legacy codebases to help understand unfamiliar code. Use when onboarding to a new project, planning refactoring efforts, assessing code for acquisition/migration, or generating documentation for undocumented systems. Analyzes architecture, dependencies, code quality issues, and test coverage. Creates high-level overviews with architecture diagrams, key components, entry points, and actionable insights for understanding and improving legacy code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze differences in program intervals between two versions of a program (old and new) to identify added, removed, or modified intervals. Use when comparing program versions, analyzing variable ranges, detecting behavioral changes in numeric computations, validating refactorings, or assessing migration impacts. Supports optional test suite integration to validate interval changes. Generates comprehensive reports highlighting intervals requiring further testing or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that interface and class contracts (preconditions, postconditions, invariants) are preserved across program versions. Use when validating refactorings, checking API compatibility, verifying design-by-contract implementations, or ensuring behavioral contracts remain intact after code changes. Automatically detects contract violations, identifies affected methods and classes, and provides actionable guidance for resolving violations while maintaining program correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate regression tests for Java codebases by analyzing changes between old and new code versions. Use when users need to: (1) Generate tests after refactoring or code changes, (2) Ensure previously tested behavior still works in new versions, (3) Cover modified or newly added code paths, (4) Migrate existing tests to work with updated APIs or signatures, (5) Maintain test coverage during code evolution. Supports JUnit and TestNG frameworks with unit tests, parameterized tests, and exception testing patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare runtime behavior between original and migrated repositories to detect behavioral differences, regressions, and semantic changes. Use when validating code migrations, refactorings, language ports, framework upgrades, or any transformation that should preserve behavior. Automatically compares test results, execution traces, API responses, and observable outputs between two repository versions. Provides actionable guidance for fixing deviations and ensuring behavioral equivalence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。