1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create, implement, or review accessibility review work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on accessibility review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move quality earlier in the development lifecycle. Covers dev/QA pairing patterns, Three Amigos sessions, TDD facilitation (Red-Green-Refactor), PR review checklists for testability, and Definition of Done with quality gates. Includes shift-left maturity model for team assessment. Use when: "shift left," "TDD," "dev-QA pairing," "definition of done," "testability," "quality culture," "QA in sprint planning." Not for: writing the unit tests themselves — use unit-testing; automated PR test-quality review at scale — use ai-qa-review; multi-quarter QA direction or roadmap — use test-strategy. Related: unit-testing, ai-qa-review, test-strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the working-tree changes (vs main) for correctness, concurrency, architecture, testing, and API/doc issues — following .github/CODE_REVIEW.md — and return a severity-graded report. Scales the machinery to the diff size: a single code-reviewer agent for a small change, or a fan-out-and-verify Workflow for a large/multi-unit one. Produces findings; it does not apply fixes (the caller does).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Use when a user asks to review a contract, check an agreement for red flags, analyze contract terms, find risky clauses, review an NDA, evaluate a service agreement, or audit employment contract terms. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and vendor contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code architecture for maintainability, catch structural issues before they become debtUse when "Reviewing pull requests with structural changes, Planning refactoring work, Evaluating new feature architecture, Assessing technical debt, Before major releases, When code feels "hard to change", architecture, code-review, refactoring, design-patterns, technical-debt, dependencies, maintainability" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
architect-review workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Master software architect specializing in modern architecture and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
iOS 应用上架大师 (审核 + ASO + 合规 + 国内/海外多区 + 付费策略) (iOS App Store launch — submission, review, ASO, compliance, post-launch monetization) Master OS — automated mastery of iOS App Store launch — submission, review, ASO, compliance, post-launch monetization: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on iOS App Store launch — submission, review, ASO, compliance, post-launch monetization problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「iOS 上架」「App Store 上架」「App 审核」「App Review」「TestFlight」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EXPERIMENTAL. Use when working the project-wide out-of-scope backlog at .reviews/code/backlog.md and .reviews/security/backlog.md — cleaning it of entries that are already fixed or gone, or picking the next entry and fixing it end-to-end. Not for producing backlog entries — that is the agentic-review skill — and not for reviewing a branch diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
review-analyzer-skill是由buluslan（公众号：新西楼.AI）研发的电商评论深度分析Skill（VOC 客户之声分析），他会帮你把一堆产品评论变成一份能落地的决策依据——22 维 AI 打标提炼用户画像、痛点和真实需求，输出 15 章深度洞察报告和可视化看板，从差评里挖出产品优化机会点、从好评里找到爆款基因。 更多跨境电商 AI 实战内容，请关注公众号「新西楼.AI」。 Deep-dive e-commerce review & VOC analysis: 22-dimension AI tagging, 15-chapter insight report with anomaly signal cards, 6 themed visualization dashboards, CSV-primary multi-source input (SellerSprite optional), Feishu sync. 当用户需要以下功能时触发：分析电商产品评论（Amazon等平台）/ 从评论中提取用户画像、痛点和VOC（客户之声）/ 生成产品洞察报告和机会点分析 / 创建可视化分析看板 / 通过卖家精灵获取评论数据（可选增强；CSV为主源）/ 将分析结果同步到飞书文档。 触发关键词：电商评论分析、评论分析、竞品分析、用户洞察、VOC分析、产品优化、市场调研、评论数据挖掘、卖家精灵、sellersprite。 NOT for 关键词调研/选品雷达类任务（那些有专门工具）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review or improve code — one skill, four modes: bug/security review (default), performance, clean-code audit, slop cleanup. Pass mode:review|perf|clean|cleanup or infer. Don't use for writing features or generating tests (use test-coverage).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Herdr loops for one open GitHub issue (resolve→review→fix) or an existing PR (review→lazy fixer) until CLEAN. Don't use for plain resolution without review, review-only/no-fix requests, backlog automation, or merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, modify, audit, repair, optimize, debug, and deploy agents with Agentforce Agent Script. TRIGGER when: user creates, reviews, or changes .agent files or aiAuthoringBundle metadata; asks to fix AgentScript, audit an existing agent, run an AgentScript health check, common-pitfall review, or baseline-versus-candidate repair loop; changes a response, action, subagent, route, state flow, or Agent Spec; previews, debugs, deploys, publishes, or tests agents; uses sf agent generate/preview/publish/test; or manages Agentforce MCP servers, tools, assets, or authentication. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex, Flow, Prompt Template, Experience Cloud, or general Salesforce CLI work is unrelated to Agent Script; or the primary input is a production session or trace ID rather than an agent artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design well-structured agent loops with best-practice coaching and cross-model review gates before you run them. Use when the user wants to design, build, or set up an agent loop, iterative agent workflow, self-review loop, LLM-as-judge loop, multi-model council, reviewer/judge gate, or goal-driven looping process. Guides goal refinement, typed verification criteria, reviewer/judge selection, privacy boundaries, termination guards, and observability, then emits a RUN_IN_SESSION.md handoff prompt plus portable loop.yaml, loop.resolved.json, LOOP.md, and run-loop.py.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AI slop patterns. TRIGGER when user says "review for AI slop", "check for AI patterns", "clean up AI code", "audit AI-generated code", or "review AI slop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md), mandatory sections, severity scale, verdict format, the workflow scaffold (when-invoked, Step-0 read-inputs, HANDOFF), and the "domain heuristic vs generic check" boundary. Eliminates duplication across the ~30 reviewer prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review any client-facing message or material (emails, letters, newsletters, social posts, website copy, presentations, performance reports, proposals) for compliance with SEC rules that govern investment advisers — the Marketing Rule (206(4)-1), fiduciary duty / antifraud provisions (206), Books and Records (204-2), and Reg BI where broker-dealer activity applies. Produces a pass/flag/fail markup, required disclosures, a books-and-records scratch-pad entry, and an archiving handoff reminder. Triggers on "compliance check", "/compliance", "is this compliant", "review this before I send it", "can I say this to a client", "check this email/post/deck". Use it whenever an advisor asks to check, review, or look over anything before it goes to a client or prospect — "check this before I send it", "look this over before it goes out" — even a routine note, because deciding that a message needs no changes is part of the review, not a reason to skip it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a portfolio review for a client or household — performance pulled from Orion, allocation drift analysis vs. IPS or model portfolio, model-portfolio mapping, rebalance preparation with tax-aware rebalance opportunities to consider, and a rebalance rationale memo for the compliance file. Triggers on "portfolio review", "/portfolio-rebalance-review", "drift analysis", "rebalance [client]", "how is [client]'s portfolio positioned", "rebalance rationale", or "map [client] to a model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits an existing rendered interface or frontend diff for hierarchy, content clarity, interaction states, accessibility, responsive behavior, visual consistency, performance-sensitive UI patterns, and anti-generic design defects. Use for a UI/UX review, redesign audit, screenshot review, pre-release visual check, or design-system consistency pass. Not for building a new interface from scratch or for backend-only review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。