「structured」の検索結果

Designs a structured real-world evidence study using EHR, claims, or registry data, with explicit handling of time zero, eligibility windows, exposure definitions, outcome windows, censoring, confounding control, and target-trial-emulation logic. Use this skill when the user needs study-type design and protocol framing for an observational clinical study based on routine-care data. Do not invent database fields, follow-up completeness, linkage, coding validity, or causal identifiability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Academic paper reading and research development system for biomedical researchers. Finds papers via Semantic Scholar, reads with structured notes, tracks discussion insights, and synthesizes literature into a Research Foundation Document (RFD) for downstream protocol design skills. 8 commands: /setup /feed /read /discuss /recap /update /sync /propose

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collects candidate biomedical literature across multiple databases, adapts search logic by database, preserves source metadata, and organizes results into a structured, screening-ready candidate pool. Always use this skill when a user wants cross-database literature collection, search strategy construction, candidate paper aggregation, or first-pass evidence organization before deduplication, screening, layered reading, or review planning. Requires real and verifiable literature records only. Every formal literature item must include a real link and DOI when available; never fabricate citations, titles, authors, years, journals, abstracts, PMIDs, or DOIs. If a DOI is unavailable or cannot be verified, state that explicitly rather than inventing one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineers the methods section of a biomedical paper into a structured, reproducible workflow. Use this skill when a user wants to understand how a study was actually executed, extract data sources, inclusion/exclusion logic, preprocessing, analytical sequence, software/tools, validation path, and critical parameters, or build a replication checklist from a paper, abstract, DOI, PMID, title, screenshot, or partial methods text. Do not treat this as generic summarization. Focus on reconstructing the operational method pipeline, surfacing missing reproducibility details, and distinguishing explicitly reported steps from inferred or unresolved ones. Never fabricate references, methods details, identifiers, software versions, parameters, datasets, or validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating Sankey or alluvial plots from sample annotation tables where rows are samples and selected columns are categorical stages such as risk group, response status, subtype, or cohort labels. NOT for: gene network flow analysis, continuous-value trajectories, or graph-structured pathway visualization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rapidly maps the evidence landscape around a medical topic by organizing major research streams, target populations, endpoints, methods, evidence density, and thin areas. Use this skill BEFORE medical-research-gap-finder — it provides the structured landscape that makes formal gap analysis more rigorous. Do not use for formal gap identification, study design, or protocol planning directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like \"analyze this paper\", \"critique this study\", \"is this a strong paper?\", \"give me similar studies\", \"prepare me for journal club\", \"help me understand this bioinformatics paper\", \"what are the weaknesses here?\", or \"turn this into a mind map\". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condenses a full study into conference-submission abstract format. Use when adapting a manuscript abstract or study summary to meet a specific conference's word limit, structured format (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion), character limits, or required section headings. Also triggers on "adapt my abstract for [conference]", "shorten my abstract to 250 words", "reformat for ASCO/ASGCT/SfN/AACR", "I need a conference abstract", or "cut my abstract to fit the word limit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when estimating relative immune cell infiltration from a bulk expression matrix with a CIBERSORT-style nu-SVR deconvolution workflow based on an LM22 signature matrix, comparing one case group against one control group, and generating structured tables plus immune-fraction plots. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, spatial data, clinical diagnosis, or workflows that require the original hosted CIBERSORT web service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when appending structured perf investigation notes and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate compression reports for video processing. Use when you need to create structured JSON reports with duration statistics, compression ratios, and segment details after video processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured CSV security audit reports from vulnerability data with proper filtering and formatting. This skill covers CSV schema design for security reports, using Python csv.DictWriter, severity-based filtering, and field mapping from JSON to tabular format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-hop evidence search + structured extraction over enterprise artifact datasets (docs/chats/meetings/PRs/URLs). Strong disambiguation to prevent cross-product leakage; returns JSON-ready entities plus evidence pointers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse SQLite databases into structured JSON data. Use when exploring unknown database schemas, understanding table relationships, and extracting map data as JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when converting natural language flight commands into waypoints and timing for a drone simulator. Covers parsing commands like "Take off to X m height in Y seconds", "Hover at X m height for Y seconds", "Fly from (x,y,z) to (x',y',z') in T seconds", and "Land from X m height in Y seconds" into structured (4×n) waypoint arrays and segment mode lists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for parsing structured unit commitment input data from JSON, CSV, benchmark cases, spreadsheets, databases, or nested tables; finding fields for time periods, resources, load, reserve, generator limits, initial conditions, startup data, renewable availability, and production costs without assuming one source-specific schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for parsing structured text input files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。