8,286 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
dbt Core/Cloud data transformations, testing, documentation, and CI/CD. Activate on: dbt, data transformation, analytics engineering, ref, source, staging model, mart, dbt test. NOT for: orchestration/scheduling (use airflow-dag-orchestrator), data warehouse tuning (use data-warehouse-optimizer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Long-running design anthropologist that builds comprehensive visual databases from 500-1000 real-world examples, extracting color palettes, typography patterns, layout systems, and interaction design across any domain (portfolios, e-commerce, SaaS, adult content, technical showcases). This skill should be used when users need exhaustive design research, pattern recognition across large example sets, or systematic visual analysis for competitive positioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates typed DAG dependency declarations, returns Kahn linear extensions or generations and residual cycle witnesses, and identifies changed consumers for revalidation. NOT for constructing graphs, scheduling resource capacity, granting effects, or executing nodes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze undirected cycle structure within a valid DAG using the source paper's orientation and contraction method. Use for cycle-basis analysis with explicit graph and reduction choices. NOT for directed feedback loops, workflow deadlocks, or runtime resilience claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes DAG waves with controlled parallelism using the Task tool. Manages concurrent agent spawning, resource limits, and execution coordination. Activate on 'execute dag', 'parallel execution', 'concurrent tasks', 'run workflow', 'spawn agents'. NOT for scheduling (use dag-task-scheduler) or building DAGs (use dag-graph-builder).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profiles DAG execution performance including latency, token usage, cost, and resource consumption. Identifies bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Activate on 'performance profile', 'execution metrics', 'latency analysis', 'token usage', 'cost analysis'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs claim-evidence verification for agent outputs, recording supported, contradicted, or insufficient-evidence results alongside source accessibility. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Warehouse cost reduction, auto-scaling, query optimization, and lifecycle policies for data infrastructure. Activate on: data cost, warehouse credits, cost reduction, auto-scaling, lifecycle policy, cold storage, cost monitoring, resource optimization. NOT for: query performance tuning (use data-warehouse-optimizer), batch job optimization (use batch-processing-optimizer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and validate a static DAG reachability index from source-qualified path/chain decompositions and partial transitive-edge filtering. NOT for treating a partial edge filter as a complete transitive reduction or runtime scheduler.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and fixes color contrast violations using WCAG 2.1 guidelines and perceptual analysis. Expert in contrast ratio calculation, color blindness simulation, and providing accessible alternatives. Activate on "check contrast", "color accessibility", "WCAG audit", "readability check", "contrast ratio", "hard to read", "can't see text". NOT for general color theory (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), brand color selection (use web-design-expert), or non-visual accessibility (use ux-friction-analyzer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when wrangler deploys silently fail or produce wrong artifacts, secrets upload as empty strings, custom domain DNS is not resolving, route assignment broke after rename, observability/tail logs are needed, D1/KV/R2 bindings are missing, OAuth scope errors block a command, cookies on a redirect are not attaching, or the worker exceeds CPU time. Triggers: "Tenant or user not found", "Authentication error" on wrangler d1 push, secret length is 0 after upload, route returns origin not worker, "compatibility_date too old", 1101 errors, custom_domain assignment lost on script rename. NOT for AWS Lambda / Vercel Edge / Deno Deploy (different runtimes), Cloudflare Zero Trust, or R2-specific tuning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloudflare Pages CI/CD with preview environments, edge functions, and Wrangler automation. Activate on: Cloudflare Pages, Wrangler deploy, preview environment, edge function, Pages project, Cloudflare Workers integration, custom domain on Pages. NOT for: Worker-specific development (use cloudflare-worker-dev), DNS management (use devops-automator), full-stack app frameworks (use vercel-deployment).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect crisis signals in user content using NLP, mental health sentiment analysis, and safe intervention protocols. Implements suicide ideation detection, automated escalation, and crisis resource integration. Use for mental health apps, recovery platforms, support communities. Activate on "crisis detection", "suicide prevention", "mental health NLP", "intervention protocol". NOT for general sentiment analysis, medical diagnosis, or replacing professional help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model an organization with BDI-inspired perceptions, expressed goals, accommodations, and levels of agency. Use for socio-technical diagnosis where actors interpret the same situation differently and agreement is partial. NOT for individual AgentSpeak execution, normative conflict algorithms, or ordinary workflow diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically intercepts and optimizes prompts using the prompt-learning MCP server. Learns from performance over time via embedding-indexed history. Uses APE, OPRO, DSPy patterns. Activate on "optimize prompt", "improve this prompt", "prompt engineering", or ANY complex task request. Requires prompt-learning MCP server. NOT for simple questions (just answer them), NOT for direct commands (just execute them), NOT for conversational responses (no optimization needed).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for bounded reasoning, partial planning, commitment policy, deliberation cost, and reconsideration-threshold design instead of assuming free deliberation. NOT for exhaustive planning, static optimization, or domains where reconsideration cost is irrelevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a normalized, machine-readable "work receipt" that answers what changed, why, by whom, and with what validation, for any AI-coding-agent task regardless of backend (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Aider, CI, or homegrown). Use when defining a receipt schema, normalizing heterogeneous agent logs into one evidence shape, gating PR merges on artifact-backed proof, or designing an OSS maintainer's fast-reject/fast-merge workflow. NOT for validating a DAG node's output against its own schema (use output-contract-enforcer), continuous runtime monitoring of a live coordination daemon (use runtime-verification-for-agents), or general Port Daddy claims/notes/salvage mechanics (use port-daddy-agent-skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design or audit an agent identity, credential, session, continuity, and reputation plan. Use when attributed outcomes must survive key rotation, restart, recovery, or review; when choosing Elo, TrueSkill, a contextual bandit, or an LLM judge; and when making Sybil, newcomer, calibration, collusion, and evidence limits explicit. Produces a supplied-plan consistency audit, never proof of observed delivery, cryptographic identity, or live enforcement. NOT for proving personhood, global Sybil resistance, or an unobserved delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。