Use for authorized security testing of desktop thick clients including local storage, update channels, IPC, traffic, and client-side trust boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,129 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for authorized security testing of desktop thick clients including local storage, update channels, IPC, traffic, and client-side trust boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized reverse engineering of browser extensions (Chrome/Firefox) including manifest analysis, background workers, and extension-based credential or traffic logic recovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
.NET / C# 二进制逆向。当目标是 .NET assembly(PE 头含 CLR、.exe/.dll 托管程序)、C# 编译产物(含 NativeAOT)、红队 Sharp* 工具(Rubeus / SharpHound / SharpHound 等)、.NET 混淆程序(ConfuserEx / SmartAssembly / Babel / Eazfuscator)、.NET loader / info-stealer / 套壳 malware 时使用。优先用 dnSpyEx + de4dot,需要 AI 直接操作时联动 dnSpy MCP。不用于纯 native 二进制(走 reverse-engineering / ida-reverse)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized security assessment of LLM applications and AI agents, including prompt injection, tool abuse, RAG exposure, memory poisoning, and model supply-chain risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides reverse engineering techniques. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized Android or iOS application reverse engineering and security testing, including APK or IPA analysis, runtime instrumentation, SSL pinning, and platform protection checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
逆向防御方实现 → 红队针对性绕过。把 EDR / Defender / AV 的 hook 表、ETW provider、AMSI 实现先逆向出来, 再写针对性的 unhook / 间接 syscall / ETW patch / call stack spoof。对照 MITRE ATT&CK T1562 防御规避。 触发关键词:EDR 绕过、AV bypass、免杀、unhook、direct syscall、indirect syscall、Hell's Gate、Halo's Gate、 Tartarus Gate、ETW patch、AMSI patch、call stack spoofing、hardware breakpoint Blindside、MITRE T1562、 ntdll unhook、kernel callback、CrowdStrike 绕过、Defender 绕过、Sentinel One 绕过、Elastic Defend、 Sysmon 规避、PPID spoof、Sleep mask、Process Hollowing、Reflective DLL。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for blue-team threat hunting, detection engineering with Sigma/YARA, SIEM query design, and incident detection validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for authorized source-code security review and SAST workflows including Semgrep, CodeQL patterns, dangerous API hunting, and fix verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
从逆向走到可用利用 (Working Exploit) 的全链路工程化方法。 适用场景:拿到了二进制 + 漏洞点 + 目标环境,需要写出一个能稳定打通的 exploit(不是只能本地复现一下、远程一打就崩的脚本)。 覆盖三大方向:栈溢出 / 堆利用 / 内核 pwn。强调"CTF 本地通 → 真实远程稳定打通"的工程差距:libc 版本错配、堆喷射时序、SMEP/SMAP/KASLR、栈对齐、远程缓冲。 核心工具链:pwntools + GEF/pwndbg + ROPgadget/Ropper + one_gadget + libc-database + qemu-system 内核调试。 触发关键词:pwn、栈溢出、堆溢出、ROP、ret2libc、ret2csu、one_gadget、libc-database、堆利用、tcache、fastbin、unsorted bin、kernel pwn、kROP、SMEP、SMAP、KASLR、modprobe_path、pwntools、GEF、pwndbg。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze binaries with radare2/r2 from the command line, including reverse engineering, disassembly, function analysis, strings/import inspection, patching, binary diffing, hex inspection, or r2 scripting. Also use it when the user mentions PE/ELF/Mach-O/DEX/WASM files together with CLI analysis, `rabin2`, `rasm2`, `radiff2`, `r2pipe`, or asks for radare2 command help on Windows/Linux/macOS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese K-12 core-literacy course design for a single OpenMAIC classroom. Use when a teacher asks for 中小学课程、核心素养、素养导向、2022 课标、真实情境、任务群、表现性评价, or wants a grade-and-subject lesson designed around authentic tasks rather than content delivery. Covers Chinese, mathematics, languages, science, humanities, technology, arts, PE and labor education across primary, junior-high and senior-high stages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers in C#/.NET against the current ModelContextProtocol 2.x NuGet packages. Helps with cases the model gets wrong without guidance — stale versions (0.x preview or 1.x-era defaults), the v2 stateless-by-default HTTP flip, the 2026-07-28 spec deprecations (roots/sampling/logging), MCP Apps and Tasks extension packages, elicitation URL mode, per-session HTTP wiring, OAuth and reverse-proxy deploy specifics, and debugging MapMcp / STDIO / Streamable-HTTP errors. Also covers STDIO and Streamable HTTP transports (SSE is deprecated), tools, prompts, resources, completions, and a basic .NET MCP client. Trigger when the user says or implies any .NET MCP server work: ModelContextProtocol, McpServerTool, MapMcp, WithStdioServerTransport, "MCP server in C#", "MCP tool in dotnet", "expose this as MCP", or names a primitive (prompt/resource/elicitation/MCP App) in a .NET context. Skip for MCP work in other languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bug fixer, architect, PR reviewer, vibecoder, security reviewer, and more), all CodeTour step types (file/line, selection, pattern, uri, commands, view), and tour-level fields (ref, isPrimary, nextTour). Works with any repository in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit SGLang startup logs, save evidence, and propose cleanup for user review. With no arguments, run Qwen3-8B at TP1 and TP2 plus gpt-oss-20b at TP1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mootdx A-share market data via TCP-direct 通达信 servers. RETIRED 2026-10 — TDX servers stopped answering the client protocol, so this source is out of the automatic fallback chain and kept only for explicit `source="mootdx"` use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a publication-grade 8-part deep-dive series on a single company (~120k words total): cognitive reset / moat / profit engine / hidden assets / era variable (e.g. AI) / financials Buffett-style / management / valuation+redlines. The core IP is NOT writing but REVISING — a strict fact-check checklist catches pseudo-precision (probability-weighted expectations, third-party MAU discrepancies, linear extrapolation), absolute language, and cross-article number inconsistencies that most finance long-forms violate. Each piece stands alone but shares one valuation/management/price framework. Use when the user wants textbook-level depth on one company for public publishing (a single research report or earnings note is NOT this — use investment-research / earnings-review instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect WMI event subscription persistence (MITRE T1546.003) by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 19, 20, and 21 for malicious EventFilter, EventConsumer, and FilterToConsumerBinding creation, cross-referenced against root\subscription namespace contents and Sysinternals Autoruns. Use when hunting WMI-based persistence, triaging a Sysmon alert on these event IDs, or during incident response and purple-team validation of WMI defenses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and test for OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA), covering excessive data exposure in API responses and mass assignment via injected request-body properties. Use when reviewing API responses/requests for over-exposed or over-writable object fields, or building detection rules and test cases for property-level authorization gaps that object-level checks miss.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects prompt injection using regex signature matching, heuristic scoring for structural anomalies, and DeBERTa-based transformer classification, flagging direct injections (system-prompt overrides, role-play escapes) and indirect injections (encoded payloads, obfuscation) per OWASP LLM Top 10 (LLM01:2025). Use for input validation layers in chatbots/agents/RAG pipelines, or for retrospectively classifying injection attempts in logs or incident investigations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures microsegmentation policies to enforce least-privilege workload-to-workload access using tools such as VMware NSX, Illumio, and Calico, preventing lateral movement in zero trust architectures. Use when designing or implementing network microsegmentation as part of a zero trust architecture aligned with NIST SP 800-207.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard that ingests findings from 200+ security scanners, deduplicates results, tracks remediation metrics, and integrates with CI/CD, Jira ticketing, and Slack notifications via its REST API. Use when consolidating scanner output into one dashboard or automating vulnerability ticketing and executive reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。