「aris」の検索結果

Generate a coherent, whole-paper mathematical modeling solution framework from a complete contest problem. Use after the user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks for modeling ideas, an overall solution plan, question-by-question analysis, candidate-model comparison, model-selection reasons, innovations, validation, or cross-question linkage. For every question, explain the task and mathematical essence, compare multiple feasible models in tables, recommend a route with explicit reasons, and keep all questions connected through shared data, variables, parameters, constraints, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement overlay — version the WHOLE deployable LLM-app artifact as one bundle: prompts + compiled programs + model snapshot pins + retrieval config + eval-set version, versioned together so a deploy is reproducible and rollback is atomic. Activate when preparing to deploy an LLM app, when asking "what exactly is running in prod right now?", when a deploy must be reproducible months later, or when an incident needs a clean rollback. The core reframe: an LLM app artifact is NOT an ML model — it is a manifest over many independently-mutable parts, not one weights file. Do NOT activate for one-off prompt edits with no deploy, for a single-component demo, or where a vendor owns the whole prompt lifecycle. For versioning ONE compiled prompt use [[agentsop-per-model-artifacts]]; for the CI comparison mechanism use [[agentsop-regression-gate]]. Search keywords: prompt versioning, reproducible deploy, what is running in prod, rollback LLM app, model pinning, prompt registry, version prompts and config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTML explainers, diagrams, architecture, timelines, source maps, slide decks, comparison tables, recaps, plan and diff reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Same-epoch comparison of training runs across wandb, neptune, tensorboard, or mlflow. Aligns runs at the student's current step (never current-vs-final-of-baseline) and separates proxy metrics from downstream targets. Use when the user asks to compare runs, check if a run is improving, track lag against a baseline, rank experiments, or evaluate run-vs-run performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AMM pool mechanics comparison across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora including fee structures, pool types, creation patterns, and volume efficiency

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and consult this skill whenever your response would include specific facts about Anthropic's products. Covers: Claude Code (how to install, Node.js requirements, platform/OS support, MCP server integration, configuration), Claude API (function calling/tool use, batch processing, SDK usage, rate limits, pricing, models, streaming), and Claude.ai (Pro vs Team vs Enterprise plans, feature limits). Trigger this even for coding tasks that use the Anthropic SDK, content creation mentioning Claude capabilities or pricing, or LLM provider comparisons. Any time you would otherwise rely on memory for Anthropic product details, verify here instead — your training data may be outdated or wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monarch Initiative knowledge graph REST API for disease-gene-phenotype associations and cross-species orthology. MONDO disease-to-gene/phenotype, HP phenotype profiles, cross-species comparisons. Use for rare disease gene prioritization and phenotype-based candidate ranking. For GWAS use gwas-database; for clinical pathogenicity use clinvar-database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk RNA-seq DE with PyDESeq2: load counts, normalize, fit negative binomial models, Wald test (BH-FDR), LFC shrinkage, volcano/MA plots. Use for two-group comparisons, multi-factor designs with batch correction, multiple contrasts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Python library for genomic interval ML. Train/apply region2vec embeddings turning BED regions into vectors, index interval datasets for ML, search embedding space with BEDSpace, and evaluate embedding quality. Use for chromatin accessibility clustering, regulatory element classification, and cross-sample region comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve mouse phenotype data from the Jackson Laboratory Mouse Phenome Database (MPD) via its REST API. Browse 520+ projects, look up per-project measure metadata, pull strain-level means (raw or LS-mean adjusted) and per-animal values, find measures by MP/VT ontology terms, and resolve strain nomenclature or gene coordinates. Use for QTL support, cross-strain comparison, mouse model selection, and ontology-driven phenotype discovery. Use monarch-database for disease-gene-phenotype knowledge graphs; ensembl-database for mouse genome annotations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide to KEGG pathway enrichment for DEG results. Covers ORA vs GSEA, mandatory directionality splitting, KEGG organism codes, API failure handling with offline fallbacks, cross-condition comparisons, and answer-first reporting. Consult when running enrichment with clusterProfiler or gseapy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bayesian modeling with PyMC 5: priors, likelihood, NUTS/ADVI sampling, diagnostics (R-hat, ESS), LOO/WAIC comparison, prediction. Hierarchical, logistic, GP variants; predictive checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for annotating statistical significance (p-value asterisks) on comparison plots. Covers standard notation (ns, *, **, ***, ****), matplotlib bracket+asterisk implementation, and use with seaborn box/violin/bar plots. Use when preparing publication-ready figures with significance markers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare EPD products on normalized GWP and other impacts while checking declared units, system boundaries, and LEED eligibility. Use for side-by-side EPD comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft Project Manual specification requirements for EPD submittals and sourced GWP limits. Use for embodied-carbon requirements in project sections; use the EPD parsing, research or comparison skills for product evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PMCC (Poor Man's Covered Call / diagonal spread) positions from IB portfolio. For each diagonal spread, reports short leg risk (delta, IV, assignment probability), daily P&L projections, top-3 roll candidates, and a side-by-side comparison table. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants an agent to run SEO for a product end to end on a daily schedule, with state kept in a seo/ folder in the repo. Covers site health checks, fact checks against commits, page 2 to page 1 pushes, AI answer tracking, competitor sitemap diffs, a monthly keyword map, articles, comparison pages, free tools and link drafts. Also use when the user mentions "seo autopilot" or asks for a daily SEO run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use swift-snapshot-testing to visually verify SwiftUI views during implementation. Renders views to PNG for comparison against design references. Fast feedback loop (~25s/cycle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a founder needs demo scripts, discovery call frameworks, objection handling, RFP/RFI responses, competitive feature matrices, POC planning, or closing playbooks. Activate for sales calls, demo prep, talk tracks, bid responses, competitor comparisons, or pre-sales engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process drone survey data for construction sites. Generate orthomosaics, DEMs, point clouds, calculate volumes, track progress, and integrate with BIM models for comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate comprehensive ROI for AI implementation projects. Takes current costs, manual process time, team size, and hourly rates. Generates detailed roi-analysis.md with executive summary, cost-benefit tables, sensitivity analysis, break-even timeline, and comparison scenarios. Use when evaluating AI investments, building business cases, or justifying automation spend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for search engines with keyword analysis, readability scoring, meta descriptions, and competitor comparison. Use this when users want to improve SEO, optimize blog posts, or analyze content for search performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pitch decks and investor presentations. Reads slide content, evaluates narrative flow, problem/solution clarity, market sizing, competitive positioning, financial projections, team credibility, and ask clarity. Generates a scored pitch-review.md with slide-by-slide feedback, overall score, top improvements, investor objection predictions, and comparisons to successful decks. Use when reviewing fundraising materials, investor decks, or pitch presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。