4,595 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
决策调研 / Decision-Driven Research：当用户面对一个具体决策需要找信息时使用——「有没有现成方案」 「怎么接入 X 平台」「这个技术可行吗」「业界怎么做 Y」「选 A 还是 B」「桌面端应该怎么定位」 「高级版和基础版怎么拉开差异」「这个产品方向对不对」。 核心行为：先框定研究层级和问题类型，再锚定决策问题，枚举竞争假设，主动找反对证据， 用排除逻辑给出有立场的结论。支持技术选型、产品策略、商业判断、竞品定位等所有需要做决定的调研。 可用中文唤起：「帮我调研」「有没有现成方案」「这个怎么接」「技术上可行吗」「帮我选一个」 「这个产品方向对不对」「我们应该怎么定位」「行业怎么做」。 与 research-topic-compiler 的边界：需要最终选择、推荐、排除理由、置信度和颠覆条件时用这个； 如果目标是长期学习、候选池沉淀或 Research Project，用 research-topic-compiler，再把 Candidate Backlog 交回本 Skill 做最终决策。 只有发现一个会实质改变结论、可研究且可关闭的证据 gap 时，才向 research-topic-compiler 发出精确 Return Request。 不用于：问题还没定义清楚时（先用 ai-collaboration-calibration L4-fuzzy 脑暴）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
竞品决策分析 / Competitive Decision Brief：当用户要调研竞品、替代方案、新产品、SaaS/AI 产品或市场信号， 并希望把官网、定价、评论、文档、更新日志、登录态走查、截图或浏览器取证转成产品定位、路线图、定价、 功能优先级、差异化、Go/No-Go 或 PRD 输入时使用。核心行为是先锚定产品决策，再选择证据渠道， 最后输出可行动的 Product Decision Brief；不要把它降级成泛泛功能清单、纯 UX 走查或“点完所有按钮”报告。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product Research / 产品研究编译器：当用户要围绕一个产品问题做系统调研、竞品证据、替代方案、行业信号、 用户与市场研究、最佳实践提炼、产品候选池、本地 HTML 研究看板、可视化研究报告或跨职能 Dashboard 时使用。 当用户只有大白话、模糊方向、业务愿望或 Roadmap/PRD 前置材料想法，需要先转成清晰研究目标、研究问题和输出要求时也使用。 适合把研究转成 Research Project、学习报告、证据矩阵、PM 决策看板、候选池、模板、实践任务、业务判断、商业化输入或高门槛应用研究前置。适合“系统研究一个主题” “整理到 Obsidian”“做深度专题”“研究行业最佳实践”“概念解读”“概念源流”“PM 技术评审提问脚本” “行业演进看板”“这个主题对我的产品决策有什么用”“让我系统学会并输出 learning report HTML”。不适合创建 Skill、评审 SKILL.md、普通即时搜索或一次性摘要。 当用户已经要在明确候选项中选一个、需要最终推荐和排除理由时，应使用 decision-research。 当 decision-research 或 grill-me 返回一个可研究、可关闭的精确证据 gap 时，也使用本 Skill 只补 Evidence Delta。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
决策闭环：当用户显式调用 `$decision-loop`，或明确要求进入“决策闭环”时使用。 面向一个已经明确、但因关键证据不足而无法下结论的产品或技术决策，在研究与决策之间最多循环三轮，直到决策成立或进入 Human Gate；不适合开放式领域学习。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when facing SEO algorithm questions, content strategy decisions, Threads growth planning, GEO optimization, AI tool selection for SEO, or evaluating SEO vendors. Triggers on any algorithm or content marketing decision — even without mentioning darkseoking. Every insight is backed by patent numbers or tested data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-test a plan, decision, or idea as a dependency-aware design tree. Use for grill-me requests, assumption audits, and decision clarification before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integration of Kahneman's heuristics research with Klein's expertise studies on intuitive decision-making
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decision-theoretic framework for agents embedded within the environments they model and act upon
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational decision frameworks: triage, escalation, case management, billing ops. Use for 'how to handle X cases', 'build triage', 'escalation protocol'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent collaboration session. Brings 2-4 agent perspectives into one discussion for architecture decisions and trade-off analysis. Use when asked "should we X or Y?", "let's discuss", or "design review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions during a task — decide read-more / stop / ask / assume / delegate, pick a minimal read-set, and time compaction. Front-page mental model is Write / Select / Compress / Isolate; a lazy pattern index routes to 25 context-engineering patterns, one reference per decision. Use when context is near budget, a long session is degrading, you must choose what to read for a task, or you are deciding /compact vs /clear vs a sub-agent. NOT for structural .claude/ overhead audits (see mk:context-audit); NOT for owning persistence (see mk:memory); NOT for USD cost (see mk:budget).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build enhancer-driven gene regulatory networks (eGRNs) by integrating single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq using SCENIC+, CellOracle base GRNs, Pando, FigR, DIRECT-NET, TRIPOD, and scMEGA. Covers the accessibility-defines-enhancers principle, peak-to-gene linking and its cell-composition confound, the paired-vs-unpaired decision, and TF-region-gene eRegulon triplets. Use when analyzing 10x multiome or paired/unpaired scRNA+scATAC to infer cis-regulatory GRNs. For RNA-only regulons see scenic-regulons; for in silico TF perturbation see perturbation-simulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect allele-specific chromatin accessibility from ATAC-seq using WASP, GATK ASEReadCounter, or RASQUAL. Use when mapping cis-regulatory genetic variants from heterozygous SNPs, separating cis from trans regulation, building chromatin QTL (caQTL) maps, validating GWAS variant function with allelic imbalance, or detecting reference allele mapping bias before downstream analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides a shared decision-making framework for selecting second-line therapies in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome who have persistent hypercortisolism after transsphenoidal surgery or for whom surgery is not feasible. Clinical triggers include "failed TSS", "non-curative pituitary surgery", "persistent UFC elevation post-op", and "surgery contraindicated".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated compliance checking against CIS, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 benchmarks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think like Fable 5 — natural, flowing, purposeful reasoning distilled from 4,665 real chain-of-thought traces with mathematical precision. Use this skill EVERY TIME before writing code, making decisions, or taking action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。