3,867 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection using methylKit tiles, bsseq BSmooth, and DMRcate. Use when identifying contiguous genomic regions with methylation differences between experimental conditions or cell types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end copy number variant detection workflow from BAM files. Covers CNVkit analysis for exome/targeted sequencing with visualization and annotation. Use when detecting copy number alterations from sequencing data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects circadian and ultradian rhythms in time-series omics data using CosinorPy cosinor models, MetaCycle (JTK_CYCLE, ARSER), and RAIN non-parametric tests. Fits cosine models to estimate phase and amplitude, tests rhythmicity significance at pre-specified periods. Use when testing for 24-hour or other known-period oscillations in circadian, feeding-fasting, or light-dark cycle experiments. Not for unknown-period discovery (see temporal-genomics/periodicity-detection).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and remove doublets (multiple cells captured in one droplet) from single-cell RNA-seq data. Uses Scrublet (Python), DoubletFinder (R), and scDblFinder (R). Essential QC step before clustering to avoid artificial cell populations. Use when identifying and removing doublets from scRNA-seq data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect antimicrobial resistance genes using AMRFinderPlus, ResFinder, and CARD. Screen isolates and metagenomes for resistance determinants. Use when characterizing resistance profiles in clinical isolates, surveillance samples, or metagenomic data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect allele-specific chromatin accessibility from ATAC-seq using WASP, GATK ASEReadCounter, or RASQUAL. Use when mapping cis-regulatory genetic variants from heterozygous SNPs, separating cis from trans regulation, building chromatin QTL (caQTL) maps, validating GWAS variant function with allelic imbalance, or detecting reference allele mapping bias before downstream analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transcribes and analyzes speech with the Deepgram API: pre-recorded audio, real-time streaming, text-to-speech and voice agents. Use when a user asks to convert speech to text, implement real-time transcription, add speaker labels or summaries to a recording, detect languages, build a voice agent with turn detection, or integrate Deepgram SDKs (JavaScript or Python).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement safety guardrails for AI systems — content filtering, prompt injection detection, output validation, bias mitigation, and responsible AI practices. Use when tasks involve adding safety layers to LLM applications, detecting prompt injection attacks, filtering harmful content, implementing rate limiting for AI APIs, validating LLM outputs against schemas, building moderation pipelines, or ensuring AI systems comply with safety policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive observability for LLM applications including tracing (Langfuse/Helicone), cost tracking, token optimization, RAG evaluation metrics (RAGAS), hallucination detection, and production monitoring. Essential for debugging, optimizing costs, and ensuring AI output quality. Use when ", llm-monitoring, tracing, langfuse, helicone, cost-tracking, ragas, evaluation, hallucination-detection, prompt-caching" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive safety guardrails for LLM applications including content moderation (OpenAI Moderation API), jailbreak prevention, prompt injection defense, PII detection, topic guardrails, and output validation. Essential for production AI applications handling user-generated content. Use when ", guardrails, content-moderation, prompt-injection, jailbreak-prevention, pii-detection, nemo-guardrails, openai-moderation, llama-guard, safety" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret video content visually by sampling frames into timestamped contact sheets that can be read as images. Use when: user asks what happens in a video; asks to summarize, describe, review, or QA video content or footage; asks about scenes, actions, people, or objects in a video; needs a storyboard-style overview of a clip; asks to find where something occurs in a video. Triggers on 'watch this video', 'what's in this video', 'summarize the video', 'describe the footage', 'contact sheet', 'storyboard', 'review this clip', 'find the scene where', 'scene detection', 'shot boundaries', 'detect cuts', 'dwell points'. For converting, trimming, or transcoding video, use processing-video instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Text-prompted image zone detection using TIPSv2 B/14 on CPU. Produces `focus_targets` / `focus_edges` bbox lists from natural-language labels, ready to feed into `svg-portrait-mode`. Use when you want automatic foreground/background separation from prompts like "dog face" + "wooden floor" instead of hand-annotating bboxes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect common technical and organizational anti-patterns in proposals, architectures, and plans. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to identify red flags before they become problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers design systems, anti-pattern detection, brand vs product registers, typography, color (OKLCH), spacing, motion, copy, and accessibility. By Paul Bakaus (ex-Google, ex-Disney, ex-Unity). Full version includes 23 sub-commands, CLI detection, Chrome extension, and E2E test suite: npx skills add pbakaus/impeccable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and rewrite frontend UI to remove generic AI design patterns ("AI slop"), both the first-order defaults (purple gradients, Inter, a centered hero over three cards, untouched shadcn) and the second-order "tasteful AI" ones (cream with terracotta, near-black with acid green, all-caps mono chrome, one accented headline word, decorative 01/02/03). Use when asked to "de-slop a UI", "make a design look less AI-generated", "audit a page or component for AI design tells", "fix Claude/Codex-generated frontend that looks generic", or keep a multi-page site on one design system. Covers HTML/CSS and React/Tailwind/shadcn. Has a detection-only mode and a zero-dependency scanner (scripts/detect.mjs) for the code-certain tells.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-detection behaviour for Genesis browser automation - what the Camoufox tools already do, what the agent must still do, Cloudflare Turnstile handling, and per-site notes for bot-hostile sites
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Foundational voice authority and AI humanizer — writes content in the user's authentic voice with built-in AI detection, and supports stealth / anti- attribution writing (forum personas, anonymous posts, "write as not-me"). Use when asked to write/draft/generate content, invoke /voice, /write-as-me, or /humanize, run voice calibration, check "does this sound like me?", "make this sound human" / "de-AI this", "write a forum post as [persona]", or run AI detection ("does this sound like AI?", "check for AI patterns", "anti-slop check"). Do NOT use this skill for code, technical docs, or any output the user has not asked to be written in their voice — code styling defers to the separate code-voice skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts. Use when user asks 'where are we in development', 'what stage are we in', 'full project audit'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
教師なし分析と EDA 前処理（欠測 / 欠損 / NaN / 補完 / imputation / 外れ値処理、クラスタリング / セグメンテーション / k-means / 階層クラスタリング / GMM / DBSCAN、次元削減 / PCA / 主成分分析 / 因子分析 / UMAP / t-SNE、異常検知 / anomaly detection / 不正検知）を実行したら必ずセットで出す図と値のルーター。fillna, dropna, fill_null, SimpleImputer, IterativeImputer, missingno, KMeans, AgglomerativeClustering, DBSCAN, GaussianMixture, silhouette_score, dendrogram, PCA, FactorAnalysis, calculate_kmo, TSNE, umap.UMAP, IsolationForest, LocalOutlierFactor, pyod がコードに現れたとき、またはユーザーが「欠損を埋めて」「クラスタリングして」「主成分で 要約して」「異常を検知して」「データをきれいにして」と言ったときに使う。安定性・k の根拠・平行分析・ベースラインに 言及がなくても適用する。SKILL.md のルーティング表で手法を特定し、対応する references/<手法>.md を読んでから実行する。 教師あり予測は predictive-modeling-diagnostics、回帰・検定は statistical-inference-diagnostics を使う。
Design deliberately flawed examples that develop error-detection skills and deepen understanding. Use when students make characteristic errors and need practice spotting mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"
Detects common LLM coding agent artifacts in codebases. Identifies test quality issues, dead code, over-abstraction, and verbose LLM style patterns. Use when cleaning up AI-generated code or reviewing for agent-introduced cruft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate API quality gates into CI — linting, breaking change detection, and coverage checks. Use when asked to "add API checks to CI", "detect breaking changes in CI", or "set up an API quality gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。