「engineering」の検索結果

Review what an LLM feature or agent actually puts in its context window — and find what's bloating, missing, or fighting itself. Use when asked to review a system prompt and context assembly, cut token usage without losing quality, debug an agent that ignores instructions, or audit how retrieval results, history, and tool definitions are packed into the window. Produces a context inventory with a keep/cut/restructure verdict per component, ordering and caching fixes, and a token budget. For wording-level prompt tuning use prompt-optimizer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get your attention back with a 30-day protocol that assumes you'll break it — a screen-time ledger without moralizing, friction engineering (what to delete, grayscale, where the phone sleeps), planned relapses, and honest replacement activities for the boredom that shows up on day 3. Use when someone says 'my screen time is 7 hours', 'I want a dumbphone', 'digital detox', 'I can't read books anymore', or 'my attention span is gone'. Produces the ledger, a personal friction plan, and the 30-day protocol with expected failure points.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

1:1 rebuild of award-winning creative websites (WebGL / scroll-animation / portfolio sites). Evidence-driven pipeline - mirror-first forensics, line-number-traceable reverse engineering of minified bundles, verbatim porting, quantitative verification gates. Use when user asks to "复刻网站", "重建网站", "1:1 rebuild", "clone this site", or provides a URL of a creative/award site to reproduce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users transform abstract ideas into actionable project specs that align engineering and design teams on the problem and success metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users navigate the end-to-end negotiation process for product and engineering roles, from initial recruiter calls to evaluating startup equity and final offer signing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users de-risk new product bets by testing core assumptions, building low-fidelity prototypes, and gathering high-signal evidence before investing heavy engineering resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users design high-performing product and engineering organizations by choosing the right reporting models, team sizes, and cross-functional partnerships. It focuses on reducing friction and maximizing ownership through structural clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugs failing GitHub Actions CI runs for PostHog PRs, commits, and branches, and answers broad CI-health questions ("is CI red?", "is master green today?", "what's broken right now?"). Use when the user asks why CI is red, asks for the current CI or master status, or mentions a failing check, GitHub Actions run, Depot runner, workflow, job, shard, merge queue kick, flaky test, lint failure, typecheck failure, snapshot diff, migration check, generated types drift, or skills build failure. Start with the `hogli ci:insights` digest (cross-run CI history from engineering analytics), then guides read-only inspection, failure classification, smallest local reproduction with hogli, and safe reporting without rerunning CI or posting to GitHub. Running unattended as the "Master-red diagnosis" workflow: see references/master-red-incident.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Disney's 12 principles as practical design and engineering rules for procedural animation. Use when creating, improving, reviewing, or debugging code-driven motion in web, SVG, canvas, React, Remotion, game, UI, character, camera, or 3D scenes; especially when motion feels stiff, weightless, mechanical, unclear, or physically correct but visually weak.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

项目级上下文工程框架：通过 PROJECT / REQUIREMENTS / ROADMAP / STATE 四层文档 为每个任务建立结构化上下文，控制 token 预算，防止上下文腐烂， 确保跨会话连续性。与 context-lifecycle 的 L0-L3 层互补。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ClickHouse database patterns, query optimization, analytics, and data engineering best practices for high-performance analytical workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Context engineering: compaction, progressive disclosure, structured notes via AgentDB. Triggers: tokens, compaction, memory, handoff, summarize, context window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect an agent repository and optional traces, interview the user, write reviewed Task Specs, build and audit Harbor tasks, and bootstrap reusable project World Knowledge Skills. Use for agent evals, benchmark design, Task generation, controlled Environments, synthetic data, Verifiers, Harbor runs, calibration, or continuous benchmark maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugging-method traps: run the discriminating experiment first, read build logs bottom-up, treat an empty actual as unwritten, audit shared handles before removing a feature, read commit history critically. Use when a fix is not converging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate Project Osmos for long-running Fabric and OneLake data-engineering outcomes, including task status, messages, follow-ups, cancellation, and deletion. Osmos tasks are remote service tasks, not local background agents. In Fabric portal Copilot, direct interaction is unsupported; point users to GitHub Copilot CLI. Use spark-cli for direct non-Osmos Spark work. Triggers: "Project Osmos", "Project Osmos task status", "check my Osmos task".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a website's SEO visibility, keyword rankings, traffic estimates, and competitive positioning. Uses web search probes, SimilarWeb (free tier via web), and site: queries to build an SEO profile without requiring paid tool subscriptions. Useful for competitive intel, gap analysis, and reverse-engineering a company's organic acquisition strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。