4,135 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates data centers, fiber networks, and tower assets with capacity analysis, tenant credit, and technology obsolescence risk. Use when analyzing digital infrastructure, evaluating tower portfolios, or assessing data center investments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates netting benefits across derivative portfolios with bilateral vs cleared netting, portfolio compression, and capital savings. Use when analyzing netting efficiency, evaluating compression opportunities, or optimizing counterparty exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh evaluation harnesses with live/fallback parser reliability, SLO gates, and regression checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Brain /brain-eval: changing Agent Brain behavior or checking quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grade a trading card using PSA, BGS, or CGC standards. Covers observation-first assessment (adapted from meditate's unbiased observation), centering measurement, surface analysis, edge and corner evaluation, and final grade assignment with confidence interval. Supports Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when evaluating a card before professional grading submission, pre-screening a collection for high-grade candidates, settling condition disputes between buyers and sellers, or estimating the grade-dependent value spread for a card.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and compare levitation mechanisms for a given application through a structured trade study. Covers magnetic (passive diamagnetic, active feedback, superconducting), acoustic (standing wave, phased array), aerodynamic (hovercraft, air bearings, Coanda effect), and electrostatic (Coulomb suspension, ion traps) mechanisms. Use when selecting the most appropriate levitation approach for transport, sample handling, display, bearings, or precision measurement applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and simplify Boolean expressions using truth tables, algebraic laws (De Morgan, distributive, absorption, idempotent, consensus), and Karnaugh maps for up to six variables. Use when you need to reduce a Boolean expression to its minimal sum-of-products or product-of-sums form, verify logical equivalence between two expressions, or prepare a minimized function for gate-level implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze pre-trained generative diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Flux) by computing quality metrics (FID, IS, CLIP score, precision/recall), inspecting noise schedules, extracting and visualizing attention maps, and probing latent spaces. Use when evaluating a pre-trained generative diffusion model's output quality, comparing noise schedule variants, analyzing cross-attention patterns for text-conditioned generation, interpolating between latent codes, or detecting out-of-distribution inputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct temperament-based health assessment from Hildegard von Bingen's Causae et Curae. Evaluates the four temperaments (sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic), elemental correspondences (air, fire, earth, water), and provides dietary and lifestyle recommendations for rebalancing. Use when understanding constitutional type in Hildegardian terms, experiencing imbalance (fatigue, digestive issues, mental fog) needing holistic guidance, seeking dietary recommendations by temperament, or researching medieval humoral medicine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive primary skill for agents working with Weights & Biases. Covers both the W&B SDK (training runs, metrics, artifacts, sweeps) and the Weave SDK (GenAI traces, evaluations, scorers). Includes helper libraries, gotcha tables, and data analysis patterns. Use this skill whenever the user asks about W&B runs, Weave traces, evaluations, training metrics, loss curves, model comparisons, or any Weights & Biases data — even if they don't say "W&B" explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。