「fact」の検索結果

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — including AI and agentic workloads regardless of cloud provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, Google Cloud migration, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform files, app code, or billing exports, clarify migration requirements, design AWS architecture, estimate costs, generate migration artifacts, and collect optional feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Includes AI provider migration guidance (for example, OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock) by selecting closest-fit Bedrock model families for required modality, latency/quality targets, context windows, and cost constraints. Model mapping is compatibility-guided, not 1:1 parity; validate prompts, tool-calling behavior, and eval metrics before cutover. Do not use for: Azure or on-premises migrations to AWS, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, GCP-to-GCP refactoring, or multi-cloud deployments that do not involve migrating off GCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save, organize, and describe reusable analysis artifacts such as SQL, result snapshots, CSV exports, summaries, caveats, plots, and report-ready files. Use when users ask to save, export, share, cite, reproduce, or organize data-analysis outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a project roadmap with major milestones. Generates the configured roadmap artifact (default .ai-factory/ROADMAP.md) — a strategic checklist of high-level goals. Use when user says "roadmap", "project plan", "milestones", or "what to build next".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Access the Anthropic product named Claude Design when the request contains that exact name, a claude.ai/design URL, or a .dc.html file. Also use for standalone-to-artifact migration and Claude Design artifact links. Use for projects, files, design systems, previews, conversations, comments, sharing, and code-to-design or design-to-code synchronization; otherwise stay inactive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go code refactoring with automated tools: gofmt -r, gopatch, and rsc.io/rf. Use this skill when performing mechanical rewrites across a codebase — renaming identifiers, migrating API calls, moving types between packages, rewriting expressions, or replacing deprecated patterns. Triggers when the task involves bulk code transformation, API migration, structural rewrite, or the user mentions gofmt -r, rf, gopatch, coccinelle-style patching, or large-scale rename/move in Go.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Phase 2b (implementation, Green phase) and Phase 2c (refactor) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-builder to implement minimal code to pass failing tests, then refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize or migrate to nested CLAUDE.md structure for progressive disclosure. Claude auto-loads CLAUDE.md from any directory it enters, so nested files get discovered automatically. Use when setting up a new project's agent config, refactoring a bloated CLAUDE.md, or adding progressive disclosure to an existing repo. Triggers on: '/agent-init-deep', 'setup progressive disclosure', 'refactor claude.md', 'split claude.md', 'claude.md is too big'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `refactor-cleaner` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Duck Critic producer-critic loop: you (main) keep producing the plan/code/tests and gate your own work at checkpoints with a different-model critic, revising until it passes. Use when asked for rubber duck, ラバーダック, 別モデルレビュー, second opinion, critic, or a different-model code review, design review, plan critique, or review by another model/agent harness. Not for readability refactoring or code cleanup alone.

Strict red-green-refactor TDD workflow for implementing features, fixing bugs, or changing behavior in Rails applications. Enforces the discipline of writing a failing test before any production code. Use whenever you want to implement with TDD — whether a new feature, a bugfix, a refactor, or any behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Malware reverse engineering and suspicious artifact analysis skill for defensive triage, static analysis, dynamic analysis planning, unpacking strategy, indicators of compromise, behavior summaries, YARA/Sigma ideas, and remediation guidance. Use for suspicious binaries, scripts, documents, logs, memory artifacts, sandbox reports, and malware family analysis in isolated environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit pervasive logical flaws in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA/2FA) implementations to bypass the secondary authentication challenge entirely. Techniques include response manipulation, referal spoofing, token reuse, and predictable backup codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a .xlsx workbook file on disk for headless sessions or artifact-based workflows instead of driving a live Excel workbook. Use when the user needs a workbook artifact created or updated from data and instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive ISA-101 design rules for Human Machine Interfaces in process automation, with detailed reference files covering color design, display hierarchy, navigation, alarms, human factors, performance, and lifecycle management. Use when designing, building, reviewing, or generating code for HMIs, control system displays, SCADA screens, or industrial control panels and comprehensive ISA-101 coverage is needed. Use when deep-diving into alarm design, color standards, navigation patterns, human factors, performance requirements, or HMI lifecycle management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing structural code search and rewriting - ast-grep linting, refactoring, multi-language patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when considering, evaluating, or performing a refactor, restructure, cross-file rename, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全重构代码技能。当用户明确提到"重构"、"代码异味"或需要在TDD循环的Refactor阶段改进代码内部结构时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes the PE Rich header and related compiler artifacts to fingerprint the build toolchain, cluster related samples, and detect inconsistencies that suggest tampering. Activates for requests to analyze a Rich header, fingerprint the compiler/linker, or cluster samples by build toolchain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic checklist for diagnosing audio artifacts. Use when the user describes a sound quality problem — clicks, pops, crackling, silence, DC offset, aliasing, phase issues, or latency problems. Trigger on phrases like "why do I hear clicks?", "my output has DC offset", "there's aliasing in my oscillator", "phase is wrong in mono", "dropout when CPU spikes". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety) and audio-numerics-review (numeric correctness) — use those to fix once the cause is found.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。