「oop」の検索結果

Run the Weave router locally in docker compose and drive it with `claude -p` to reproduce and verify routing/translation behavior for a specific upstream model (e.g. GLM-5.1, DeepSeek, Qwen). Use when verifying a router fix end-to-end, reproducing a prod routing bug, confirming a model's streaming behavior (nudges, tool-call suppression, loop/no-progress breaks), or testing a `/force-model` route — without touching the user's global Claude Code config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose gh-aw failures using logs and audits; follow the shared strategy for patches and permitted active debug loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diverga Dashboard - Live configuration status and feature overview. 24 specialized agents across 9 categories for social science research. VS methodology prevents mode collapse. Human checkpoints enforce human-in-the-loop decisions. Triggers: /diverga, diverga dashboard, diverga status

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers structural econometric models. Use when the user is building, estimating, or debugging structural models — including BLP demand estimation, dynamic discrete choice, auction models, or any workflow involving moment conditions, nested fixed-point algorithms, or MPEC formulations. Triggers on "structural model", "moment conditions", "NFXP", "MPEC", "BLP", "random coefficients", "dynamic discrete choice", "CCP", "Rust model", "auction estimation", "GMM objective", "inner loop", "contraction mapping", or convergence/starting value problems in optimization-based estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact. Since 2026-08 it also carries a provenance layer (去水印): deterministic, CJK-safe cleaning of invisible-character carriers and file metadata (docx / png / jpg / svg / pdf, incl. C2PA), an honest account of Claude's statistical text watermark, and an author "ownership pass" — it never claims a text is watermark-free.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug a reproducible symptom with a bounded feedback loop and original-scenario verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever a pull request is opened, reopened, or synchronized in microsoft/apm to assess whether and how the documentation corpus must change to stay truthful with the proposed code change. Activate even when the PR title or body says nothing about docs -- the skill must run on every PR to detect silent drift between code and docs. Classifies impact as no-change, in-place edit (one to a few paragraphs), or structural change (new page or TOC reshape), then orchestrates a CDO + doc-writer + python-architect + editorial-owner + growth-hacker loop to produce a patch-ready advisory. Does NOT review code quality, security, or test coverage. Does NOT auto-merge or auto-push doc edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and patch existing Lark/Feishu documents while preserving comments, highlights, citations, and newer remote edits. Use for iterative document updates, local-mirror sync, or durable project ownership; LoopX integration is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate fast-agent session and history files to diagnose issues. Use when a session ended unexpectedly, when debugging tool loops, when correlating sub-agent traces with main sessions, or when analyzing conversation flow and timing. Covers session.json metadata, history JSON format, message structure, tool call/result correlation, and common failure patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

实践认识论：把方案、假说或判断放回实践中检验，按「实践 → 认识 → 再实践」螺旋迭代，并在开始前写明循环终止条件。当你提出了假说要验证、一次尝试失败要复盘再来、发现自己只想不做或只做不想时触发；一次性输出、答案可直接查阅、还没形成假说（先调查）时不触发。 English: Practice-cognition loop. Test a hypothesis or plan in practice, learn from the result, and iterate in a rising spiral with an explicit stop condition. Trigger when a plan needs validation, an attempt failed and must be retried, or you notice thinking without doing (or doing without thinking); skip for one-shot outputs, lookup questions, or before any hypothesis exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs maximum-saturation research with a cooperating team, claim-graph gating, and a cited, QA'd deliverable. Use when the user explicitly asks for research or a deep investigation, including any 'ulw' research wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a hypothesis-driven debugging loop across any language or binary, escalating to orthogonal oracle angles and locking the fix with a failing test. Use for crashes, silent failures, hangs, wrong responses, memory leaks, async misbehavior, or reverse engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page summaries back into an agent loop so its next iteration learns from the last one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and improves Browserbase Agent API demos through an Autobrowse-style outer loop: run a fixed task, collect Agent messages and session logs, score the result, revise one system-prompt heuristic, and confirm convergence. Use when creating a Browserbase Agents demo or POC, optimizing an Agent system prompt, diagnosing flaky Agent runs, or applying auto-research/autobrowse to the Browserbase Agents API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-improving browser automation via the auto-research loop. Iteratively runs a browsing task, reads the trace, and improves the navigation skill (strategy.md) until it reliably passes. Supports parallel runs across multiple tasks using sub-agents. Use when you want to build or improve browser automation skills for specific website tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-compatible cancel command for Ralph loop state, preserving the original command name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create detailed phase plan (PLAN.md) with verification loop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YOLO mode. Spawns 4 parallel C-suite agents (CEO, CTO, CFO, COO). Each analyzes the business from their perspective using ALL available data. Produces unfiltered Hard Truths report. After user types YOLO, autonomously runs the business for a day using /loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and generate .envelope.json AI agent team definitions — the open standard for multi-agent teams with hierarchy, access policies, human-in-the-loop gates, and cron schedules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official NVIDIA-authored guidance for navigating PhysicsNeMo — pick the model, datapipe, or example for a SciML/AI4Science task (surrogates, forecasting, downscaling, physics-informed, inverse, generative). Points at existing files via live repo search; never writes code. Do NOT use for installation or environment setup, training-loop or other code authoring/scaffolding, contributor/CI/packaging questions, repo-specific questions in physicsnemo-sym/-cfd/-curator, or general (non-physics) ML/PyTorch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。