「report」の検索結果

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. Inside: 4-step research framework (website → social → traffic → ad spend) · 3-version Wayback evolution analysis · X/Twitter propagation-chain mapping · growth-flywheel 6-stage scoring · KOL identification · content-effectiveness ranking · ICP + freemium pricing teardown · self-check checklist. New in 1.2: time-machine competitor archaeology — Google date-range search back to pre-fame years, star-history launch-day reconstruction (AppFlowy ~40-channel zero-budget launch teardown), competitor funding news as a launch-timing signal, and the "open source alternative" positioning play. Sourced from first-hand founder interviews (AFFiNE co-founder, 2026-04, self-reported figures marked). 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

SEO/GEO Agent Operations SOP v2 — Rebuilt from real-world operations (analook.com 0→launch, GSC incident, DataForSEO monitoring, gingiris.tools post-migration recovery). What's new in v2: • Step-by-step onboarding (Q1→Q6), multiple choice wherever possible — no big forms • Mandatory daily SEO log — first item is always GSC token status check • Data cross-validation rule: any external metric must come from ≥2 sources before use • Backlink progress tracking (6-week wait → check → alert if not indexed) • New vs. established site strategy matrix (new site <6mo: KD≤20; mature: KD up to 35+) Real incidents baked in: GSC token expired silently for 2 weeks (analook.com), P0 keywords dropped out of Top 100 after domain migration (gingiris.tools), traffic data off by 17× from single-source DataForSEO. Triggers: "SEO agent" | "SEO daily report" | "GSC monitoring" | "DataForSEO" | "GEO agent" | "backlink tracking" | "IndexNow" | "competitor comparison page" | "SEO SOP" | "autonomous SEO" | "GEO triple combo" 🇨🇳 SEO/GEO Agent 运营 SOP v2 — 基于真实运营经验重写（analook.com 从零建站 + GSC 断档 2 周 + DataForSEO 监控 + gingiris.tools 迁移权重恢复）。 对话式开局、强制日报（GSC token 是第一项）、数据交叉验证铁律、外链进度追踪、新老站区分策略。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional PDF financial plan generator. Scans current working directory for FINANCE-*.md files, extracts scores and financial data, then runs the bundled Python ReportLab script to produce a polished, client-ready PDF with cover page, Financial Health Score gauge, score breakdown, cash flow, debt, retirement, portfolio, and prioritized action plan. Output: FINANCE-PLAN.pdf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MCP skill for IGW (InsurGateway) error management — list, analyze, report, and manage insurance integration errors across test and production environments. Invoke whenever user asks about IGW errors, insurance gateway issues, success rates, or error reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms Claude into a CFA-level financial analyst for specialty finance, regulatory compliance, and industry-specific analysis. Use when performing private credit pricing, insurance reserving, FP&A variance analysis, wealth planning, restructuring recovery analysis, real estate valuation, venture capital analysis, ESG assessment, regulatory capital analysis (Basel III), compliance reporting (MiFID II, GIPS), credit derivatives (CDS, CVA), convertible bond analysis, lease accounting (ASC 842/IFRS 16), pension funding/LDI, sovereign risk assessment, real option valuation, equity research (SOTP, target price), commodity spread trading, treasury operations, PPP infrastructure modelling, onshore fund structuring, offshore fund structuring, transfer pricing analysis (BEPS, Pillar Two), tax treaty optimisation, FATCA/CRS compliance, economic substance analysis, regulatory reporting (AIFMD, Form PF), AML/KYC compliance, crypto/DeFi analysis, municipal bond analysis, structured products, trade finance, fund of funds (J-curve, commitment pacing, manager selection, secondaries), bank analytics (NIM, CAMELS, CECL, deposit beta, loan book), carbon markets (credit pricing, ETS, CBAM, offsets, shadow carbon price), or private wealth (concentrated stock, philanthropic vehicles, wealth transfer, direct indexing, family governance) analysis is required. Pairs with corp-finance-mcp tools for computation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Estonian Health Insurance Fund annual reports for financing, service volumes, and system performance indicators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates Warren Buffett's complete investment thinking system. The following scenarios must trigger it: analyzing any stock or company, evaluating investment opportunities, interpreting financial reports/annual reports/shareholder letters, assessing business moats or competitive advantages, evaluating management quality and integrity, making buy/hold/sell decisions, understanding core value investing concepts (compounding/intrinsic value/margin of safety/circle of competence/Mr. Market), analyzing any industry (insurance/banking/consumer/media/energy/railroads/technology), handling capital allocation/buybacks/dividends questions, assessing market sentiment and macro risks, exploring when to sell, analyzing institutional imperative or management behavior. Even if the user does not mention "Buffett," proactively trigger whenever the topic involves investment analysis, business quality assessment, or investment decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes vehicle insurance daily reports and signing lists. Use when user asks to analyze insurance data, generate business reports, check institution performance, monitor policy trends, or detect business anomalies. Handles Excel/CSV files with fields like premium, institution, customer type, and renewal status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics and BI engineer — dashboards, metrics design, reporting pipelines, and data storytelling. Use when asked to "build a dashboard", "design a metric", "write a report", or "audit our analytics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical writing, engineering specifications, reports, presentations, and documentation standards for engineering practice. Covers document types (requirements documents, test reports, design rationale, operations manuals), writing style, data visualization, engineering drawing standards, and oral presentation techniques. Use when writing engineering documents, presenting technical results, creating specifications, or learning documentation best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarise the job search from the markdown tracker - funnel, response rate, what's working, where applications come from, what's pending on the user. Use when the user runs /seekter-report or asks how the search is going, for weekly numbers, or what to change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when skillsaw reports a likely false positive, misses an edge case, behaves incorrectly, or needs an RFE. Gather a safe report and, only with explicit user permission, create a feedback bundle or open a GitHub issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person. Use for decision makers, reporting-line candidates, stakeholder mapping, and warm intro paths. Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings without starting another assessment workflow. Use when a plugin assessment needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, or marketplace-readiness result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and report current API syntax, changelog entries, and breaking changes for a specific library or protocol version. One research angle within a parallel technical-research set — runs independently and returns a structured cited report. Invoke when a specific library name and version are the target.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Send feedback or bug reports to the Deepline team. Use when the user asks to report feedback or share a session, and proactively when a Deepline Play is disproportionately slow, appears stuck, or an ordinary outcome requires avoidable product steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start-of-session situational report for a research or code repository. Reads the handoff, log, or status files the project actually keeps, checks live git state, and reports the objective, verified baseline, open tasks, blockers, and next actions, flagging where the documents and the repository disagree. Use when resuming work after time away or before changing anything. Its end-of-session twin is finished.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。