「sam」の検索結果

Deploys, queries, and debugs AWS Marketplace usage-based (PAYG) metering — the pipeline (ResolveCustomer, BatchMeterUsage, EventBridge via SAM) and querying/debugging metering records, statuses, failures, discrepancies. Covers Concurrent Agreements (CustomerAWSAccountId + LicenseArn), multi-product, CloudTrail Event History (90 days; never CloudTrail Lake), Seller Reports (Billed Revenue/Usage columns + CSV/SDDS parsing), existing-stack detection, metering region for BatchMeterUsage/MeterUsage (DisabledApiException), metered AMI/Container + IAM roles, where registration data lives (customer-profile table), legacy ProductCode + CustomerIdentifier, DuplicateRecord/CustomerNotSubscribed, bad LicenseArn. Also SCOPES adjacent asks — flat-rate/SaaS-Subscription "do I still meter", CCP included-units + overage, contract term/annual renewal, forecasting future bills/usage — with the right answer or a one-line redirect. Use for any BatchMeterUsage/ResolveCustomer or SaaS usage-billing question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for anything related to EAS Observe - adding `expo-observe` to an Expo project (AppMetricsRoot/ObserveRoot HOC, markInteractive and ObserveInteractiveMarker, the useObserve hook, the Expo Router / React Navigation integrations for per-route metrics, user-defined events via `Observe.logEvent`, error reporting via ObserveErrorBoundary and `Observe.reportError`, and runtime config such as sampleRate and dispatchInDebug), querying via the EAS CLI (`eas observe:metrics-summary`, `observe:metrics`, `observe:routes`, `observe:events`, `observe:session`, `observe:versions`), interpreting the resulting metrics (cold/warm launch, TTR, TTI, navigation cold/warm TTR, update download, and the TTI frameRate/device/network params for triaging slow startups), or shipping an Observe integration inside a third-party package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect Apify debug evidence for support tickets and troubleshooting. Use when an Actor run has failed, is stuck, or produced empty output and you need to gather run metadata, logs, dataset samples, and environment info before opening a support ticket. Trigger with "apify debug", "apify support bundle", "collect apify logs", "apify diagnostic", "apify run failed why".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a minimal, reviewable Alchemy EVM read with viem and prove its network, authentication, and failure behavior. Use when starting an Alchemy integration or replacing an SDK sample. Trigger with "Alchemy hello world", "read an Ethereum block", or "test my Alchemy connection".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade identity-fabric mapping: tenant/federation fingerprinting and the pre-auth user-ENUMERATION oracle methodology — enumeration and fingerprint only, never credential submission. Covers domain-to-tenant resolution (Microsoft getuserrealm.srf Managed/Federated namespace check, Entra OIDC metadata tenant-GUID extraction, Autodiscover v2), keyless Microsoft tenant-federation mapping (GetFederationInformation SOAP -> sibling-domain discovery, discover-only ROE, FEDERATED_WITH provenance edge held out of attack-path pivoting), Okta org-slug derivation + OIDC fingerprint + governed custom-domain enumeration, ADFS passive/active fingerprint + version inference, Google Workspace MX-correlated detection, generic OIDC (Auth0/Keycloak/Ping Identity/OneLogin/Duo) discovery, SAML metadata (5 paths), Azure AD Seamless-SSO Negotiate-challenge detection, Microsoft Defender for Identity (MDI) sensor-API presence check, the user-enumeration oracle methodology for Microsoft GetCredentialType (IfExistsResult semantics: exists / doesn't-exist / exists-in-federated-tenant / throttled) and Okta /api/v1/authn (errorCode differential), Medium-detectability discipline with a hard 20-candidate-per-tenant cap and admin/role interest-based ranking, and name x confirmed-email-pattern login-candidate synthesis that FAILS CLOSED with zero output when no org pattern is confirmed. Grounded directly in a production ASM implementation's sso_idp.py, tenant_recon.py, and core/email_patterns.py modules. Deepens — does not duplicate — offensive-osint skill's Identity Fabric endpoint reference with the tenant-federation MAP, the oracle WORKFLOW, and the candidate-SYNTHESIS methodology that reference lacks. Use when fingerprinting an organization's identity provider, mapping its tenant/federation boundary, running an authorized pre-auth user-enumeration pass, or synthesizing login candidates from harvested names to feed that oracle — never for password spray, credential submission, or auth bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-traceable market research reports and assumption-driven market sizing or forecast scenarios. Use for market definition, industry and customer evidence, competitive landscapes, TAM/SAM/SOM reconciliation, forecast sensitivity, and auditable report scaffolds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSRF testing playbook. Use when reviewing state-changing web flows, anti-CSRF defenses, SameSite behavior, JSON CSRF, login CSRF, and OAuth state handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) to align vision and execution across a company. Use when the user mentions "EOS", "Entrepreneurial Operating System", "V/TO", "quarterly rocks", "Level 10 meetings", "accountability chart", "IDS process", "my company feels chaotic", "we keep having the same problems", or "get the whole team aligned". Also trigger when a growing company needs meeting structure, goal-setting frameworks, or a systematic way to solve recurring organizational issues. Covers the six EOS components: Vision, People, Data, Issues, Process, Traction. For team motivation design, see drive-motivation. For lean experimentation, see lean-startup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make short product / skill motion videos (10–30 s, narrated feature demos up to ~60 s) the way high-end launch clips are made — kinetic type, real UI as the material, a hand that causes every reaction, beats that carry into each other instead of replacing each other, hard cuts only where they mean something — without HyperFrames or Remotion. A single HTML composition where every value is a pure function of time, built from a library of measured moves (springs, entrances, carries, contact, camera), rendered frame by frame with real shutter motion blur (1080p30 drafts, 4K60 final), with synthesised sound effects that share one room and an oracle that fails a slideshow before a human has to watch it. Use for 做个动效短片 / 产品宣传片 / 介绍视频 / 发布视频 / 15 秒 launch video / 给 skill 或 app 做个视频 / promo / teaser, for turning real pages or screen recordings into a cut, for product feature demos (产品功能演示 / 功能展示动效) where the UI is rebuilt in HTML from screenshots instead of screen-recorded (不录屏 / 复刻界面 / 截图还原 UI), for narrated cuts with voice-over and subtitles (配音 / 字幕 / 换配音) and for the same film in other languages (日语版 / 多语言 / 本地化), for adding motion vocabulary (动效库 / 转场 / 衔接), and for auditing why a motion video reads as a slideshow (像 PPT / 没节奏 / 一个一个展示 / 转场生硬).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports a free local mode (file analysis) and a paid DataForSEO API mode that runs only after the user approves the call count. Outputs a severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when the user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages". Not a site audit (blog-audit) or cluster planning (blog-cluster); it changes no files or redirects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn one pool of existing project media into a batch of distinct, publishable montage cuts instead of a single hero edit. Use for batch montage, one-source-many-outputs, 一源多出, 批量混剪, 批量出片, 矩阵号, 多账号分发, variant batches, deduped cuts, 去重变体, 防搬运, or when the user asks for N different versions of the same footage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure a Next.js app using posthog-js so session recording and dead-click capture survive browser ad blockers. Aliases the three blocker-flagged JS chunks (dead-clicks-autocapture.js, recorder.js, posthog-recorder.js) to bland same-origin paths via Next.js rewrites, and monkey-patches HTMLScriptElement so posthog-js requests the aliases. TRIGGER when posthog-js session replay or dead-click capture is failing in production with ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT or 404s on /static/dead-clicks-autocapture.js / /static/recorder.js / /static/posthog-recorder.js, or when the user wants to bypass ad blockers for these specific assets. Works alongside an existing PostHog reverse proxy (managed or otherwise) — only the three blocked files divert through Next.js, all other PostHog traffic stays on the original api_host. SKIP for unrelated PostHog setup, non-Next.js apps, or when capture/decide endpoints (/e/, /decide/, /array/*/config.js) are the ones being blocked — those need a different treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cooking close-ups, mukbang and eating vlogs. They work when every beat shows one visible change in the food and one matching sound, and the dish stays the same dish from first frame to last. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Food close-ups and eating ASMR; 中文触发词: 美食特写与吃播 ASMR, 美食, 吃播, ASMR, 烹饪), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the root cause of a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fix. Use this whenever something is broken and the cause is not yet proven — a failing test, a production error, intermittent behavior, or a symptom that appeared after a change. Also use when a fix has been attempted and did not work, or when the same bug keeps coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces design reference imagery before implementation — screen concepts, layout directions, and flows for web or mobile that make a verbal brief concrete enough to argue with. Use this when a brief needs visualizing before anyone builds, when comparing layout directions, when handing a developer a target, or when stakeholders are describing different things with the same words.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages delivery risk and cross-team dependencies — identifying, sizing, mitigating and escalating what could stop the work. Use this to build a risk register that gets used, manage dependencies between teams, decide what to escalate and when, or work out why the same risks keep materializing unmanaged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and maintains the design system a product is assembled from — tokens for color, type, spacing and elevation, component contracts, and the rules that keep them coherent as the product grows. Use this when starting a new interface, when screens have drifted apart visually, when the same component exists three times in slightly different forms, or when a token or component needs adding without breaking what exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to assess delivery risk, or when the same failure keeps recurring. Also use to decide whether to build, hire, or outsource a capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an operational incident from detection to closed action — declaring it and naming a commander, separating the people restoring service from the people communicating, keeping a timeline as it happens, deciding when it is over, and running a review that produces a small number of changes someone actually completes. Use this to set up an incident process, run one, work out why the same failure keeps recurring, or fix a review practice that generates findings nobody closes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs, documents, and fixes operational processes — mapping the current state, finding where work actually stalls, redesigning the flow, and building controls that hold. Use this when the same failure keeps recurring, when a handoff between teams is unreliable, when onboarding a repeated task, when work takes far longer than the work itself, or when deciding whether to automate, standardize, or eliminate a process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures how a person or brand actually writes and turns it into reusable voice instructions every other content skill draws from. Use this before drafting any content for a new brand or client, when output keeps coming back sounding generic, when several writers need to sound like one, or when a voice needs defining without existing samples to learn from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。