「signal」の検索結果

Builds and revises a complete skill DIRECTORY — SKILL.md, scripts, references, assets — and packages it. Use for "create a skill for X", "turn this into a skill", "update/improve this skill", "why doesn't my skill trigger", "review this SKILL.md", "package this skill", or when a repeated procedure should become a reusable artifact. Enforces the structure that makes skills work — a concrete procedure rather than a goal statement, an explicit applicability boundary, failure modes with their signals, a runtime verification step, and a description checked against the existing catalogue for confusability. For choosing whether the instruction should be a skill at all rather than project instructions or a prompt, use crafting-instructions. For writing quality inside the prose, use writing-instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Join and operate on tiny.place (the agent-to-agent social network): create a self-custodied wallet, fund it via MoonPay, buy/renew/transfer a @handle 'domain', publish a discovery card, discover and resolve other agents, manage your profile and social graph (follow/feed/reputation), send Signal end-to-end encrypted messages, earn and spend through the jobs/escrow economy and marketplace, audit the settlement ledger, and poll the platform for updates — all through the `tinyplace-agent` CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live on tiny.place (the agent-to-agent social network) like a person lives on a social app — entirely through the `tinyplace` CLI. Onboard a @handle identity, get funded, become discoverable, then run a recurring check-in loop that pulls your messages, notifications, and feed and acts on them: reply to DMs, react on the feed, follow agents, join groups, and fund/win bounties (contest-style paid work) over Signal end-to-end encryption and x402 payments. Use whenever an autonomous agent or harness needs to onboard to, or keep operating on, tiny.place.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local SEO analysis covering Google Business Profile optimization, NAP consistency, citation health, review signals, local schema markup, location page quality, multi-location SEO, and industry-specific recommendations. Detects business type (brick-and-mortar, SAB, hybrid) and industry vertical (restaurant, healthcare, legal, home services, real estate, automotive). Use when user says "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP", "map pack", "local pack", "citations", "NAP consistency", "local rankings", "service area", "multi-location", or "local search".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI Overviews (formerly SGE), ChatGPT web search, Perplexity, and other AI-powered search experiences. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) analysis including brand mention signals, AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt compliance, passage-level citability scoring, and platform-specific optimization. Use when user says "AI Overviews", "SGE", "GEO", "AI search", "LLM optimization", "Perplexity", "AI citations", "ChatGPT search", or "AI visibility".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Experience Optimization: reads Google SERPs backwards to detect page-type mismatches, derives user stories from search intent signals, and scores pages from multiple persona perspectives. Identifies why well-optimized pages fail to rank by analyzing what Google rewards for each keyword. Use when user says "SXO", "search experience", "page type mismatch", "SERP analysis", "user story", "persona scoring", "why isn't my page ranking", "intent mismatch", or "wireframe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a fully structured, project-specific CLAUDE.md by scanning the repo for signal files (package.json, Makefile, .github/workflows/, .env.example, etc.), inferring stack, commands, architecture, and conventions, then asking at most 3 targeted questions for what cannot be inferred. Use whenever the user says 'create a CLAUDE.md', 'my CLAUDE.md is blank', 'generate project context', 'initialize CLAUDE.md', 'set up Claude context for this repo', 'fill in my CLAUDE.md', or any variation where someone needs their project context documented for Claude. If a CLAUDE.md already exists with content, runs a diff-and-merge flow before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite and optimize existing blog posts for Google rankings (December 2025 Core Update, E-E-A-T) and AI citations (GEO/AEO). Full rewrite for both Google rankings AND AI citations. For AI-citation-only audit (no Google work), use blog-geo instead. Replaces fabricated statistics with sourced data, applies answer-first formatting, adds Pixabay/Unsplash images, generates built-in SVG charts, injects FAQ schema, performs AI content detection, adds citation capsules and information gain markers, and updates freshness signals. Works with any blog format (MDX, markdown, HTML). Use when user says "rewrite blog", "optimize blog", "update blog", "improve blog", "fix blog", "refresh blog post", "blog optimization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes a numeric or categorical answer to a quantitative data-science question by cleaning and analyzing local data files (CSV, Excel, TSV, and scientific formats .npz/.fits/.h5) with pandas, numpy, and scipy. Use whenever a task ships its own dataset (in whatever local directory it provides) and asks you to derive a value via statistical, geospatial, temporal, ratio, percentage, growth-rate, correlation, signal-processing, orbital, or forecasting analysis. Spans domains including archeology (demographics, paleoclimate proxies, radiocarbon dating, historical conflicts); biomedical/bioinformatics (tumor histology, genes, proteins, peptides, genomic variants); environmental (water quality, bacterial/Enterococcus exceedance, rainfall correlations, environmental justice); legal/consumer (fraud, identity theft, consumer complaints by state/metro); wildfire (incidents, causes, suppression costs, acres burned, fatalities, geospatial intersections); and astronomy/heliophysics/space weather (satellite telemetry TLE/Swarm/SP3, indices OMNI/GOES, solar activity, atmospheric density, orbital mechanics, forecasting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

review-analyzer-skill是由buluslan（公众号：新西楼.AI）研发的电商评论深度分析Skill（VOC 客户之声分析），他会帮你把一堆产品评论变成一份能落地的决策依据——22 维 AI 打标提炼用户画像、痛点和真实需求，输出 15 章深度洞察报告和可视化看板，从差评里挖出产品优化机会点、从好评里找到爆款基因。 更多跨境电商 AI 实战内容，请关注公众号「新西楼.AI」。 Deep-dive e-commerce review & VOC analysis: 22-dimension AI tagging, 15-chapter insight report with anomaly signal cards, 6 themed visualization dashboards, CSV-primary multi-source input (SellerSprite optional), Feishu sync. 当用户需要以下功能时触发：分析电商产品评论（Amazon等平台）/ 从评论中提取用户画像、痛点和VOC（客户之声）/ 生成产品洞察报告和机会点分析 / 创建可视化分析看板 / 通过卖家精灵获取评论数据（可选增强；CSV为主源）/ 将分析结果同步到飞书文档。 触发关键词：电商评论分析、评论分析、竞品分析、用户洞察、VOC分析、产品优化、市场调研、评论数据挖掘、卖家精灵、sellersprite。 NOT for 关键词调研/选品雷达类任务（那些有专门工具）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to systematically improve his X (Twitter) content by iterating on the content-generation prompt (prompts/x/prompt.md, used by the every-6h tweet Action) and finding which prompt version produces the highest-reach tweets. Each prompt edit is a git-SHA-versioned, numbered experiment with a hypothesis; tweets are attributed to the version live at post time and judged on median impressions per tweet. Also mines per-tweet impression data for content-feature signals (angle / length / topic) that feed the next prompt edit. North-star = impressions per tweet. Triggers — "改 X 的 prompt", "X 内容改进", "哪版 prompt 最好", "什么内容 impression 高", "improve my tweets", "A/B test the X prompt", "/wjs-x-improving-content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read your X (Twitter) audience and niche from real data. Pull a handle's recent tweets (yours or a competitor's) with likes, replies, and views, see which formats and hooks are working, read the repliers on a tweet (X gates likers, so repliers are the signal), and scan a niche query for top tweets. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze my tweets", "what is working on X", "read the replies", "competitor tweets", "who is engaging". Not for writing a tweet (use x-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned launch-appeal grader for public pages. Grades findability, first-screen clarity, CTA pull, proof quality, design signal, and AI citation readiness. Use when a public page needs a fast A-F visibility grade before or after launch. NOT FOR: the deep nine-lane SEO audit with rewrite fixes (use suede-seo-audit); implementing conversion changes (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by AI answer engines (use suede-ai-seo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned retention discipline for voluntary and involuntary churn: cancel flows, pause paths, evidence-based save offers, failed-payment recovery, proactive signals, and win-back design. Use when diagnosing subscriber loss or designing a bounded retention intervention. NOT FOR: lifecycle-email production (use suede-emails), pricing architecture (use suede-pricing), paywall design (use suede-paywalls), or event instrumentation (use suede-analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals. Use when researching named competitors from current public URLs or refreshing a structured landscape. NOT FOR: publishing comparison pages (use suede-competitors), internal sales battle cards (use suede-sales-enablement), or deciding pricing changes (use suede-pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to work on a Claude Code skill file (SKILL.md): writing one from scratch, testing whether an existing one works well, running evals or benchmarks, improving its instructions, or fixing why it isn't triggering. Triggers on: 'make a skill for X', 'test this skill', 'run evals on my SKILL.md', 'touch-skill', sharing a SKILL.md and asking if it's ready to ship. The key signal is intent to create, validate, or improve a skill — not just mention one. Do NOT trigger for general Claude Code questions, hook debugging, or CLAUDE.md configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。