2,749 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Integrate Microsoft Graph SDK into any project — .NET, TypeScript/JavaScript, or Python. Covers auth patterns (client credentials, OBO, managed identity), SDK setup, calling Graph APIs, batching, delta queries, change notifications, throttling, and permission scopes. Use when accessing Microsoft 365 data (users, mail, calendar, Teams, files, SharePoint) from any application type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an outage, production incident, or significant service degradation has occurred and the team needs to write a structured blameless post-mortem. Triggers on phrases like "write a post-mortem", "incident review", "what went wrong", "outage report", "root cause analysis", or "RCA". Covers timeline reconstruction, contributing factor analysis, impact quantification, and action item generation with owners.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pro+ subscription required. Tenant-wide Power Automate monitoring using the FlowStudio MCP cached store: failure rates, run-health trends, maker/app inventory, inactive owners, and compliance/health reports. Use only for aggregated tenant views. For one environment, one flow, run control, or root-cause debugging, use flowstudio-power-automate-mcp, flowstudio-power-automate-debug, or the server monitor-flow bundle. Requires FlowStudio for Teams or MCP Pro+.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Go-to-market strategy for AI products. Use when positioning AI products, handling "who is responsible when it breaks" objections, pricing variable-cost AI, choosing between copilot/agent/teammate framing, or selling autonomous tools into enterprises.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Govern Power Automate flows and Power Apps at scale using the FlowStudio MCP cached store. Classify flows by business impact, detect orphaned resources, audit connector usage, enforce compliance standards, manage notification rules, and compute governance scores — all without Dataverse or the CoE Starter Kit. Load this skill when asked to: tag or classify flows, set business impact, assign ownership, detect orphans, audit connectors, check compliance, compute archive scores, manage notification rules, run a governance review, generate a compliance report, offboard a maker, or any task that involves writing governance metadata to flows. Requires a FlowStudio for Teams or MCP Pro+ subscription — see https://mcp.flowstudio.app
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic prompt generator that creates customizable AI prompts for scanning codebases and identifying high-quality code exemplars. Supports multiple programming languages (.NET, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Angular, Python) with configurable analysis depth, categorization methods, and documentation formats to establish coding standards and maintain consistency across development teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates deep links to the Arize UI for traces, spans, sessions, datasets, labeling queues, evaluators, and annotation configs. Produces clickable URLs for sharing Arize resources with team members. Use when the user wants to link to or open a trace, span, session, dataset, evaluator, or annotation config in the Arize UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort whose destination is unclear is routed to /ask-navigator before this pipeline starts). Humans own the checkpoints where there is no unique answer or the error cost is severe; agents continuously run everything repeatable and acceptable-by-evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consensus planning entrypoint that auto-gates vague ralph/autopilot/team requests before execution
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cancel any active OMC mode (autopilot, ralph, ultragoal, swarm, ultrapilot, pipeline, team) and clean up retired legacy state
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate and publish a project status artifact — an opinionated, tabbed status page for a project too big for one update (overview & success criteria, the workstream sequence, next steps, plus background, plan, risks & open questions, and decisions/FAQ when they earn a tab) — published with the built-in Artifact tool to a default-private claude.ai page the user can share with teammates. Use when a piece of work spans several workstreams and you want a shareable overview kept current. Each artifact is backed by a small per-project config in the plugin data dir, so refreshing it re-gathers live state, redeploys the same URL, and reports only the delta. For software projects whose workstreams are PRs, also read swe.md (the X.Y PR-numbering convention; pulling PR state with gh/git; a per-PR detail block). Needs the built-in Artifact tool (claude.ai login). Not for single-PR changes or public docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you need the allowed_tools / skills preset for a sub-agent role before calling spawn_subagent. Trigger especially when user mentions: "role", "spawn_subagent", "allowed_tools", or any OMP role name (executor, architect, analyst, critic, security-reviewer, code-reviewer, qa-tester, planner, explore, debugger, verifier). Also use when a /ultrawork, /ralph, /autopilot, /ultraqa, or /team workflow step asks for role tool/skill configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token unlock schedule analysis and project treasury tracking — vesting cliffs, linear unlocks, team/investor/ecosystem token releases, treasury diversification, and sell pressure forecasting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (11 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (478 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 29 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, nobitex, wallex, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp/gildata).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect privilege escalation attempts across Windows and Linux, including access token manipulation, UAC bypass, unquoted service path abuse, kernel exploits, and sudo/doas abuse. Use when threat hunting for T1068-style privilege escalation, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious privilege changes, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures Fail2ban with custom filters and actions to detect port scanning activity, SSH brute force attempts, and network reconnaissance, automatically banning offending IP addresses and alerting security teams to suspicious network probing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Mimikatz credential-dumping activity via command-line pattern matching, LSASS access signatures, binary/hash indicators, and in-memory detection of known Mimikatz modules. Use when threat hunting for T1003 credential access, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on LSASS access, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect RDP brute force attacks by parsing Windows Security Event Logs (EVTX files, via python-evtx) for failed logon patterns (Event ID 4625, Logon Type 10/3), correlating with successful logons (Event ID 4624), and analyzing NLA failures and source IP frequency. Use when investigating exposed RDP endpoints, building SIEM detection rules for credential guessing, or confirming whether a compromised account followed a brute-force pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect WMI event subscription persistence (MITRE T1546.003) by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 19, 20, and 21 for malicious EventFilter, EventConsumer, and FilterToConsumerBinding creation, cross-referenced against root\subscription namespace contents and Sysinternals Autoruns. Use when hunting WMI-based persistence, triaging a Sysmon alert on these event IDs, or during incident response and purple-team validation of WMI defenses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Pass-the-Hash (T1550.002) attacks by analyzing NTLM authentication patterns, flagging Type 3 logons using NTLM where Kerberos would be expected, and correlating with credential-dumping indicators. Use when threat hunting for lateral movement via stolen NTLM hashes, triaging EDR/SIEM alerts on suspicious NTLM logons, scoping compromise during incident response, or validating detection coverage in a purple team exercise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill teaches security teams how to detect and respond to unauthorized cryptocurrency mining operations in cloud environments. It covers identifying cryptomining indicators through compute usage anomalies, network traffic patterns to mining pools, GuardDuty CryptoCurrency findings, and runtime process monitoring on EC2, ECS, EKS, and Azure Automation workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。