972 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
学术论文审稿意见回复信。输入是审稿人意见全文、reviewer comments、major/minor revision letter、或既有的 rebuttal 草稿时使用。功能包括：意见拆解 + ID 分配 + 行动映射（classify）、起草 point-by-point 回复（draft）、润色既有草稿（polish）、防御性与真实性审查（audit）、起草给编辑的 cover letter（cover）。覆盖期刊与会议 rebuttal、4 种困难场景（矛盾意见、不可能实验、缺关键证据、minor revision）。不适用于：正文段落写作（用 academic-writing）、图表生成（用 academic-figure）、参考文献格式（用 academic-citation）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, auditing, or optimizing skills — validates against the 7 Skill Killers checklist and produces fix recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing a PR description, suggesting reviewers, or flagging risk — produces owner-mapped roles plus historical bug-pattern matches from project-local YAML.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a README for accuracy, usability, and alignment with the actual repository. Detects invented content, broken setup steps, and structural issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or editing a persona in src/agent-src/personas/ — voice / focus / unique questions / output expectations — even when the user just says 'add a reviewer voice for X'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Role-based collaboration pattern (Drafter, Reviewer, Breaker). Assigns roles to available agents via prompt parameters. Use when starting multi-agent dev work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Boot a four-agent visible-terminal team, get all four to "Ready to Rock!", lock live session names to roles, and launch a Lead/Reviewer/Breaker/Verifier sprint without mandate drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Habilidade abrangente de revisão de código para TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Swift, Kotlin, Go. Inclui análise automatizada de código, verificação de boas práticas, scanning de segurança e geração de checklist de revisão. Use ao revisar pull requests, fornecer feedback de código, identificar problemas ou garantir padrões de qualidade de código.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Content] Use when you need background HTTP server rendering markdown files with calm, book-like reading experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and document handoffs, parent lane contracts, and parallel batch contracts between specialized AI agents (foreman, workers, reviewers). Use for multi-agent workflows, subagents, original goal preservation, native gates, claim ceilings, terminal states, baton passes, or guild-style agent coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing or fixing prose that reads like a leaked reasoning transcript — dead design-session citations such as (decision N), audit item codes, or §N of uncommitted drafts; change narration such as "used to", "no longer", "this cut"; stack or review vantage ("a later PR in this stack", "rejected in review"); reviewer-addressed justifications; control-flow narration; or hedged planning residue in comments, JSDoc, docs, or Agent Notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a pull request in the deepseek-harness repo — orients the reviewer to this codebase's standards (AGENTS.md conventions, defensive patterns, ADRs, quality gates) and the review-specific checks that code alone can't show
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships. Use when output must clear two independent adversarial reviewers before it ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a UI change for human sign-off before building it. The default path deploys a rough live staging preview (with NUXT_PUBLIC_CROUTON_REVIEW=true) so the reviewer pins comments on the real running page. Use --static for the offline HTML/CSS mockup fallback (no deploy available, or speed over fidelity). Invoke for any task that adds/changes a .vue component, a layout, a page, or a theme.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a WebM demo video of a UI flow with shot-scraper video — a YAML storyboard drives the browser (click, type, scroll, wait) with an animated cursor overlay, so a reviewer can watch the feature instead of driving it. Use to attach motion evidence to a UI sign-off (#307), to turn an issue's "How to test" steps into a watchable clip, or when asked to "record a demo", "make a video of this flow", "show me it working".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draws an interactive HTML Architecture Viewer for any code flow the user names. Walks through seven research-driven steps (flow, name, repo research, lens colors, evidence flags, lens+mechanism per stop, build) and verifies links, claims, and generated artifacts before delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run every Convex audit (authz, reviewer, advisor, insights) into one scored, deduped readiness report with an ordered fix plan — Lighthouse for your backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulates academic peer review, evaluating papers across Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing to provide Major/Minor Revision recommendations with actionable feedback. Triggers when a user asks to "review my paper," "simulate peer review," or "give my paper a peer review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integration review after stable code. Audit tier for high-risk surfaces; planning tier for optional low-risk review. Produces a review note and fix list — no implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Offensive/hostile QA auditor. Generalist reviewer specialized in the WordPress universe. Assumes everything is wrong until proven otherwise. Audit-tier only — produces severity-ranked findings, never implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。