Split user stories into smaller, independently deliverable slices using the SPIDR method (Spike, Path, Interface, Data, Rules). Use this skill whenever the user asks to split a story, break down work, slice a story, asks "can this be split", mentions "SPIDR", says "story splitting", or wants to decompose a large ticket into smaller pieces. Also trigger when a user presents a story that seems too large for a single sprint and asks for help sizing or scoping it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Acceptance-test newly added features using browser automation, happy-path flows, screenshots, UX notes, and a written report. Use when asked to test a feature, verify a recent UI change, or check whether an app workflow works.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Generate a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a new feature. Use when planning a feature, starting a new project, or when asked to create a PRD. Triggers on: create a prd, write prd for, plan this feature, requirements for, spec out.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Mine Claude Code session data for analytics — token usage, tool rankings, skill invocations, session search, and prompt history. Use when asked about session stats, token costs, tool frequency, skill usage patterns, or finding past sessions by prompt text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Generate a bullet-point summary of branch changes for a PR description. Triggers on "changelog", "pr summary", "summarize branch", or "/changelog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Product-discovery coach for Fishbowl engineers — inspired by Marty Cagan's work (never impersonates him). Stage-routes between opportunity brief, research, PRD, ticket drafting, and outcome review. Triggers on "product coach", "help me with product", "I need to write a PRD", "I want to do discovery", "opportunity assessment", "who is this for", "why are we building this", or when an engineer is starting, resuming, or post-mortem-ing product-adjacent work. Invoke with a short description of what you want to do, or invoke bare to be surveyed and routed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Clarify ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions before implementation; stop before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
TDD Production Code Refactoring Process. Triggers on 'tidy up', 'tidy this', 'clean up code'. Use for refactoring production code with test coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Break an application or feature into thin vertical user-story slices with clear acceptance criteria and user-observable value. Use when planning a backlog, decomposing a feature, writing implementation-ready stories, or turning requirements into deliverable slices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Run a second, harder escalation pass using the original glazer prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glazer`, when a first escalation still feels incremental, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while forcing a sharper replacement rather than more polish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Apply Steven's Bash script style rules: strict mode, minimal validation, concise logic, executable scripts, and no unnecessary comments or echoes. Use when creating, reviewing, or refactoring shell scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Run one explicit escalation pass using the original glaze prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glaze`, when the first answer feels merely adequate, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while pushing for a materially stronger direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Compile deep repository evidence into artifact-bound correctness doctrine — authority/law/proof maps, owned invariants, failure archaeology, and the strongest durable destination for each piece of knowledge, plus an optional minimal repository-specific skill portfolio. Use when the user wants both deep codebase understanding AND durable doctrine, knowledge routing, or repo-specific skill recommendations. Research discoverable facts before asking. Read-only. Not for quick onboarding, one isolated invariant, ordinary implementation, generic review, or direct skill creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Lateral-thinking playbook that always returns a five-tier strategy portfolio (Quick Win through Moonshot). Use when you need options, alternatives, or trade-offs; when progress is stalled or failing repeatedly; or when you ask to think creatively, reframe constraints, and choose a strategic path before execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Comprehensive code review for quality, security, performance. Triggers on 'review code', 'code review', 'check this PR', 'audit code'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Gauntlet for absolute claims (always/never/guaranteed/optimal); pressure-test, then refine with explicit boundaries. Use when users ask to prove or disprove strong certainty claims, request devil's-advocate challenge rounds, or want the /tw-prove-it gauntlet to run all 10 rounds continuously by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
XP-style plan review that identifies gaps, hidden assumptions, and critical misses. Triggers on 'review the plan', 'check the plan', 'audit the plan'. Reviews plans for YAGNI violations, missing feedback loops, and over-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新
Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SDiamante13/dotfiles☆ 82026年10月2日 更新