「need」の検索結果

Raw mechanical interfaces fusing Swiss typographic print with military terminal aesthetics. Rigid grids, extreme type scale contrast, utilitarian color, analog degradation effects. For data-heavy dashboards, portfolios, or editorial sites that need to feel like declassified blueprints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates infrastructure needs based on traffic forecasts, workload analysis, and performance requirements with sizing recommendations and cost trade-offs. Use for "capacity planning", "infrastructure sizing", "resource estimation", or "scalability planning".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a Spark feature or writing or materially revising a design proposal that needs repository-first research, user input on unresolved key choices, and an owner-aligned implementation plan before code changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark change needs its authoritative owner, affected boundaries, risks, acceptance criteria, and smallest verifiable slice established before implementation or review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark branch or pull request needs final diff hygiene, validation selection, commit scope, remote topology, and readiness checked before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a running Spark or DSH web service needs real-browser verification — page load, client-plugin boot errors, console errors, failed requests, or onboarding/dialog rendering — with the repository's own Playwright chromium.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a source must be reached through DergiPark, ULAKBIM TR Dizin, HEAL-Link, YOK Thesis Center, or an institutional library route, when off-campus access fails, or when a lawful retrieval plan is needed for Turkish, Greek, or European materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a systematic, scoping, or rapid review needs a reproducible pipeline: protocol framing (PICO/SPIDER/PCC), a logged search string, title/abstract and full-text screening with recorded exclusion reasons, and PRISMA flow counts, with the human as the deciding screener.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before a tag, GitHub release, or Zenodo archive, when README, CATALOG, CHANGELOG, CITATION.cff, the disclosure aggregate, and skill discovery must agree, or when a go or no-go release verdict needs recorded evidence behind it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the search-planning stage of a literature review, when database lanes and language layers must be chosen, when DOI coverage policy is unclear, or when inclusion and exclusion criteria need drafting before any source is read; not for running the screening and PRISMA pipeline of a formal review, which is prisma-scoping-review-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before sensitive, clinical, identifying, or raw interview data is placed in front of an AI tool, when transcripts or student materials need de-identification, or when a data-minimization gate must run before any analysis or drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a study needs a preregistration or a frozen analysis plan, when confirmatory and exploratory analyses must be separated, or when every deviation from the registered plan must be logged before the result is reported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a research note system needs architecture, when MOCs, frontmatter standards, and retrieval patterns must be designed for years of work, or when an existing vault has outgrown its structure and must migrate without breaking years of links.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a study's materials, data, code, or preprint need an open-science release: license choice, a persistent DOI (Zenodo/OSF), README and metadata, and an access-and-embargo decision that respects ethics constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building slides, a poster, or a lightning talk from a manuscript, when a presentation must exist in Turkish and English, or when conference visuals need a traceability check so every number on a slide matches the analysis behind it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a course, assessment, or student-feedback workflow and deciding where AI assistance is acceptable, when grading or feedback must stay within academic-integrity and FERPA/KVKK boundaries, or when AI-use rules for students need stating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when serving as a peer reviewer and deciding whether and how AI may assist, when a manuscript under review must never be pasted into an external tool, or when a confidentiality-preserving review and disclosure are needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an ethics committee or IRB application involves AI anywhere in the pipeline, when KVKK, GDPR, or EU AI Act duties must be mapped to a study, or when consent and disclosure language about AI use needs drafting before submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。