「anti」の検索結果

FDA regulatory consultant for medical device companies. Provides 510(k)/PMA/De Novo pathway guidance, QMSR (21 CFR 820, which incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference since 2026-02-02; formerly QSR) compliance, HIPAA assessments, and device cybersecurity. Use when user mentions FDA submission, 510(k), PMA, De Novo, QMSR, QSR, ISO 13485 for FDA, premarket, predicate device, substantial equivalence, HIPAA medical device, or FDA cybersecurity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Project Manager for enterprise software, SaaS, and digital transformation projects. Specializes in portfolio management, quantitative risk analysis, resource optimization, stakeholder alignment, and executive reporting. Uses advanced methodologies including EMV analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, WSJF prioritization, and multi-dimensional health scoring. Use when a user needs help with project plans, project status reports, risk assessments, resource allocation, project roadmaps, milestone tracking, team capacity planning, portfolio health reviews, program management, or executive-level project reporting — especially for enterprise-scale initiatives with multiple workstreams, complex dependencies, or multi-million dollar budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to surface behavioral patterns, communication anti-patterns, and actionable coaching feedback. Use this skill whenever the user uploads or points to meeting transcripts (.txt, .md, .vtt, .srt, .docx), asks about their communication habits, wants feedback on how they run meetings, requests speaking ratio analysis, mentions filler words or conflict avoidance, or wants to compare their communication across time periods. Also trigger when users mention tools like Granola, Otter, Fireflies, or Zoom transcripts. Even if the user just says "look at my meetings" or "how do I come across in meetings" — use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:fda-qsr-audit-prep <scope> — FDA 21 CFR 820 (QSR / QMSR) audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Post-Feb 2026 substantially harmonized with ISO 13485. Use before annual internal QSR audit, pre-FDA-inspection readiness, or Form 483 response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Risk quantification in dollars, compliance roadmap (SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA/GDPR), security architecture strategy, incident response leadership, and board-level security reporting. Use when building security programs, justifying security budget, selecting compliance frameworks, managing incidents, assessing vendor risk, or when user mentions CISO, security strategy, compliance roadmap, zero trust, or board security reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review agent-written changes before merge, after substantial edits, or when re-reviewing a repair. Use the adversarial protocol for high-risk changes or an explicitly requested deep review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user define a concrete, measurable goal before starting work, especially when they ask to use the goal tool, create a goal, set an objective, clarify success criteria, or turn a fuzzy intention into a quantitative outcome. Use this skill for goal creation and goal refinement only; it does not manage durable snapshots, decision logs, or long-running execution artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planificación persistente basada en archivos para tareas multipaso de agentes de IA. Mantiene task_plan.md, findings.md y progress.md en disco; los hooks del ciclo de vida inyectan contexto seleccionado de planificación del proyecto. La recuperación automática solo lee los archivos de planificación del proyecto. session-catchup.py --metadata, solicitado de forma explícita, puede inspeccionar metadatos locales de sesiones del mismo proyecto; --replay puede emitir extractos limitados y enmarcados con nonce. El modo con gate opcional solo puede solicitar que el host continúe si este lo admite y nunca ejecuta comandos declarados en Markdown. El skill no tiene ninguna ruta de carga por red. Úsalo para investigación o trabajo que requiera 5 o más llamadas a herramientas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find flaky tests from CI logs — aggregates pass rates, spots intermittent failures, recommends quarantine. After multiple runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope creep check — current scope versus the original plan. Flags additions, quantifies bloat, recommends cuts. 'Any scope creep?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove multi-vendor AI provenance marks: invisible Unicode (Layer A), statistical text watermarks via rewrite (Layer B, always offer), and C2PA/EXIF/XMP/container metadata on PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/PDF/DOCX/ODT/HTML/MD/TEX. Covers Claude, Gemini/SynthID-class, OpenAI provenance, and open-LLM sampling marks. Use when the user asks to strip watermarks, remove C2PA/Content Credentials, clean AI metadata, remove invisible Unicode, anti-detect clean AI output, or runs /remove-ai-marks (aliases: /remove-claude-marks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and Iceberg), establishing metadata governance with Knowledge Catalog aspect types, or grounding agentic IDEs (VS Code, Antigravity) by using the Google Cloud Data Agent Kit. Don't use for provisioning borderless data lakehouse infrastructure (use google-cloud-solution-agentic-ai-borderless-data-lakehouse instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mounts Cloud Storage buckets on Google Cloud as a POSIX file system using Cloud Storage FUSE (and the gcsfuse CLI tool). Use when interacting with the gcsfuse CLI or Cloud Storage FUSE mounts: decide whether FUSE, native gs:// reads, or Filestore/Managed Lustre fits a workload, deploy tuned mounts on GKE, Compute Engine, or Cloud Run, enable and size file, stat, and list caches, tune mount flags (--implicit-dirs) or config-file settings, apply workload profiles, keep ML checkpointing safe (rename atomicity, hierarchical namespace/HNS, close-time finalization, concurrent writers), or diagnose slow training, low throughput, or bill spikes with gcsfuse metrics. Covers mount semantics, gcsfuse CLI and config files, GKE gcsfuse CSI driver (Workload Identity principal:// bindings, profile StorageClasses, sidecar sizing), and Cloud Run volume mounts. Don't use for bucket administration or data management without a mount (google-cloud-storage-basics) or fully POSIX-compliant shared file systems (Filestore, Managed Lustre; use gke-storage).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns feedback from Plain, public reviews, and a Slack channel into deduplicated, quantified themes, and reconciles each theme against one Linear issue in {{linear_team}} — never prioritizing, assigning, or closing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AI agent skills before installation using NVIDIA SkillSpector and source-aware semantic review. Use when asked whether a skill or downloaded skill folder is safe, trustworthy, installable, over-permissioned, or malicious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduces an always-on LifeOS context file that has grown too big via a human-gated pass — deterministic GC of stale entries first, then semantic merges and relocations — never dropping a directive and committing every change reversibly. USE WHEN /trim, trim the context, trim OPERATIONAL_RULES, this file is too big, reduce a doctrine file, prune an always-loaded file, fold the proposal inbox, shrink CLAUDE.md or DA_IDENTITY. NOT FOR general code refactoring, trimming video or audio media (use AudioEditor for audio files), or removing AI writing patterns from prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate Cortex, the LifeOS memory system — the typed Knowledge Archive (People, Companies, Ideas, Research with typed related: links) plus recall of prior work sessions, ISAs, and conversations. Search, add, harvest, develop, ingest, distill, graph-navigate, recall. USE WHEN cortex, knowledge, knowledge base, search knowledge, what do we know about, archive, harvest, knowledge status, develop note, add to knowledge, ingest, contradictions, knowledge graph, retrieve, mine conversations, distill, weekly digest, cortex digest, context search, prior work, recall, remember, previous sessions, context recovery, what did we do, find session, search history, resume, pick up where we left off, cold start, yesterday's work, last week, the one about. NOT FOR published-content semantic search across blog/newsletter/X/LinkedIn, or one-shot URL/YouTube ingestion via the Arbol harvester pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens LifeOS tests via property/mutation testing. USE WHEN harden, hardening, property test, property based testing, PBT, fast-check, mutation test, mutation testing, Stryker, CRAP score, CRAP analysis, DRY scan, jscpd, acceptance test mutation, strengthen tests, sharpen ISCs, find bugs example tests miss, universal quantified claim, shrink counterexample, what bugs am I missing, test the tests, test of the test. NOT FOR writing new feature tests (use bun test directly), grading agent output quality (use Evals), UI verification with real Chrome (use Interceptor), finding security vulnerabilities, or building new functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument an AI application with DeepEval's native tracing so its behavior is visible in Confident AI. TRIGGER when the user wants to add DeepEval tracing or @observe to an LLM app, agent, RAG pipeline, or chatbot; wire a framework, model-provider, or vector-database integration (LangGraph, LangChain, OpenAI Agents, LlamaIndex, Pydantic AI, CrewAI, and others); choose between a native integration and manual instrumentation; set span types, tags, or metadata; or send DeepEval-SDK traces to Confident AI's Observatory. DO NOT TRIGGER for building DeepEval pytest eval suites, datasets, goldens, metrics, or deepeval test run (use the `deepeval` skill), or for raw OpenTelemetry / OTLP export without the deepeval package (use the `deepeval-otel` skill). This skill is purely DeepEval-SDK instrumentation — producing well-formed traces, not running evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to explain or reason about the foundational concepts of context engineering: what context is, the anatomy of a context window, how attention mechanics work, the U-shaped attention curve, why context quality matters more than quantity, and the mental models needed to interpret every other context-engineering decision. Use this for conceptual explanation, onboarding, and background reading. Route operational work to the specialized skills: debugging attention failures goes to context-degradation, token-efficiency work goes to context-optimization, conversation summarization goes to context-compression, and project-shape decisions go to project-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for persistent semantic memory in agent systems: cross-session knowledge retention, entity tracking, temporal validity, graph or vector retrieval, memory consolidation, and memory benchmark selection. Route file-backed scratchpads to filesystem-context, handoff summaries to context-compression, and token-efficiency tactics to context-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。