「aris」の検索結果

Construct statistical arguments for MVP/awards. Narrative framing, comparison to past winners, advanced metrics, counter-arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses Cowork-style multi-step analysis to process deal room documents -- contracts, financials, org charts. Outputs risk assessment, term comparison, key findings, and negotiation recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches the open web for docs, comparisons, and news via You.com MCP or WebSearch. Use when a topic needs knowledge beyond GitHub, forums, or academia.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides fg-data-profiling data profiling, report generation, configuration, CLI, comparison, privacy, and optional Spark/notebook integration workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Hugging Face Evaluate to load metrics, comparisons, and measurements; compute and combine results; run evaluator pipelines; create custom modules; troubleshoot optional dependencies, cache, Hub, and CLI workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and advise on the best way to approach a software project, including architecture, tech stack, implementation strategy, pricing/operating-cost tradeoffs, benchmark research, and comparisons with similar real-world projects. Use before building, mid-build, or after completion when the user asks for project strategy, optimal approach, research comparables, similar projects, stack selection, vendor/service choice, repo analysis, architecture critique, implementation feedback, or a prioritized improvement plan. Avoid for narrow single-bug debugging or isolated file edits unless the user asks for broader project direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive PET selection guide covering differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and trusted execution environments. Includes use-case matching matrix, performance comparison, and GDPR alignment assessment for each technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily attendance register: check-in and check-out, hours worked, work mode, late minutes, leave and regularisation flags, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for payroll input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create professional, consultant-grade PowerPoint presentations from scratch using MckEngine (python-pptx wrapper) with McKinsey-style design. Use when user asks to create slides, pitch decks, business presentations, strategy decks, quarterly reviews, board meeting slides, or any professional PPTX. AI calls eng.cover(), eng.donut(), eng.timeline() etc — 67 high-level methods across 12 categories (structure, data, framework, comparison, narrative, timeline, team, charts, images, advanced viz, dashboards, visual storytelling), consistent typography, zero file-corruption issues, BLOCK_ARC native shapes for circular charts (donut, pie, gauge), production-hardened guard rails for spacing, overflow, legend consistency, title style uniformity, dynamic sizing for variable-count layouts, horizontal item overflow protection, chart rendering, and AI-generated cover images via Tencent Hunyuan 2.0 with professional cutout, cool grey-blue tint, and McKinsey-style Bézier ribbon decoration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look development loop for Blender assets combining materials, lighting, camera, and screenshot comparison until shading reads correctly via MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when comparing two videos to analyze compression results or quality differences. Generates interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Triggers when users mention "compare videos", "video quality", "compression analysis", "before/after compression", or request quality assessment of compressed videos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for search engines with keyword analysis, readability scoring, meta descriptions, and competitor comparison. Use this when users want to improve SEO, optimize blog posts, or analyze content for search performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix LRU-bounded Flutter/bloc state classes that silently lose insertion-order updates. Use when: (1) a state class uses `Equatable` with a `LinkedHashMap<K, V>` field to preserve insertion order (LRU, MRU, recent-items caches), (2) `Cubit.emit` appears to drop emissions when an existing key is re-inserted or moved to most-recent, (3) LRU eviction evicts the "wrong" entry after a refresh, (4) a test that reports the same key twice and then overflows the cap sees the refreshed entry evicted instead of the oldest. Root cause: Equatable's default map comparison is structural (unordered), so reordering without changing keys/values produces an "equal" state that `Cubit.emit` suppresses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to compare features and options side-by-side.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares old and new requirement documents, analyzes code repository impact, and generates detailed modification plans. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Compare requirement versions and identify changes, (2) Map requirement changes to code components, (3) Identify components to modify, delete, or add, (4) Analyze dependencies and integration points, (5) Assess test impact, (6) Generate comprehensive modification plans in Markdown format. Supports text/Markdown requirements and analyzes feature-level, functional, and API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for contract negotiations with term analysis, BATNA preparation, negotiation playbooks, and comparison frameworks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。