1,683 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert in presenting technical work to non-technical audiences. Covers demo preparation, storytelling for demos, handling failures gracefully, and making work visible and impressive. Understands that perception is reality and great work undemoed is invisible work. Use when "demo, present, show stakeholders, demo day, showcase, walkthrough, show and tell, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The art and science of narrative-driven brand communication. This skill transforms brand messages into compelling stories that connect emotionally, build memory, and drive action. In a world of infinite content, story is the only thing that cuts through. Great brands don't sell products—they tell stories. Apple tells the story of creative rebels. Nike tells the story of human potential. Patagonia tells the story of environmental stewardship. This skill teaches you to find, craft, and tell your brand's story across every touchpoint. AI amplifies storytelling capability—generating variations, adapting across channels, maintaining consistency—but the human insight that identifies the true story remains essential. This skill bridges narrative craft with AI execution. Use when "story, storytelling, narrative, brand story, origin story, hero journey, emotional connection, customer story, testimonial, case study, brand film, about us, storytelling, narrative, brand-story, emotional, hero-journey, content" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate starter unit tests for a small function or module. Use when a junior developer needs test scaffolding and edge cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
供应链与生产运营 (供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后 just-in-case、多源、近岸/友岸的回摆;精益派反驳崩的是『假精益』——单一来源+砍库存不砍变异) ⇄ 服务水平 vs 库存成本(安全库存/报童模型/ABC-XYZ 的经典取舍,牛鞭效应放大上游波动) ⇄ 成本导向压价 vs 供应商共生开发(Kraljic 分级、丰田供应商协会式长期共生 vs 年降指标与竞价) ⇄ 一个数 vs 各部门各算各的(S&OP/IBP 的本质是跨职能对齐到一套数字与一份产销计划))**; (b) 工具栈(此行的工具是『系统+方法』的混合) — ERP/MRP(SAP S/4HANA PP·MM、Oracle、用友·金蝶、Odoo、NetSuite)、APS 高级计划排程(Kinaxis RapidResponse、o9、Blue Yonder、SAP IBP、OMP、Siemens Opcenter APS)、MES/车间执行(Siemens Opcenter、Rockwell FactoryTalk、黑湖智造)、WMS/TMS、需求预测(统计模型 + Nixtla StatsForecast/Prophet、FVA 预测增值分析)、运筹优化与仿真(OR-Tools、Gurobi、Pyomo、AnyLogic、FlexSim、SimPy)、供应链风险与多级可视(Resilinc、Everstream、Interos)、分析层(SQL/Python pandas/Power BI)、以及纸笔工具(价值流图 VSM、A3、看板、标准作业票)—— 选型决策树的关键分岔是 MTS/MTO/ATO/ETO 履行模式与需求变异度,而非厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 利特尔法则(在制品 = 产出率 × 流动时间)、瓶颈与非瓶颈、缓冲三态(库存/时间/产能缓冲)、解耦点(客户订单渗透点 CODP)、牛鞭效应、takt time 节拍与产线平衡、OEE 与六大损失、muda·mura·muri 三种浪费、自働化 jidoka 与安灯、防错 poka-yoke、SMED 快速换模换出小批量、平准化 heijunka、PDCA 与丰田改善型 Toyota Kata、DMAIC 与 Cpk 过程能力、报童模型与安全库存公式、ABC-XYZ 分级; (d) 工作流/SOP — 跑一轮月度 S&OP(需求评审→供应评审→预 S&OP→执行 S&OP)、做需求预测与预测误差复盘(MAPE/WMAPE/bias/FVA)、设定库存分级与安全库存、MRP 跑批与例外消息处理(缺料齐套与 MRP 神经质)、瓶颈识别与 DBR 排产、价值流图现状图→未来图→改善计划、新品导入 NPI 与多级 BOM/ECN 工程变更、供应商选择与开发(RFQ→审厂→APQP/PPAP→量产→年度绩效)、断料应急与交期承诺(ATP/CTP)、循环盘点与库存准确率; (e) 知识正典(en/ja 一手极厚,中译齐全) — 《目标 The Goal》Goldratt(TOC 小说体奠基)、《丰田生产方式》大野耐一、《改变世界的机器》Womack·Jones·Roos(MIT IMVP 研究)、《精益思想 Lean Thinking》Womack & Jones、《丰田模式 The Toyota Way》Liker、《工厂物理学 Factory Physics》Hopp & Spearman(排队论视角的运营科学)、《学习观察 Learning to See》Rother & Shook(VSM)、《丰田套路 Toyota Kata》Rother、Spear & Bowen 的 HBR 1999《Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System》、Lee/Padmanabhan/Whang 1997《The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains》、Ptak & Smith 的 DDMRP、Orlicky 的 MRP、Chopra & Meindl 的供应链管理教材、Deming《转危为安 Out of the Crisis》、Sheffi《The Resilient Enterprise》、ASCM/APICS 的 SCOR 参考模型与 CPIM/CSCP 知识体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — 大野耐一(TPS 立法者)、新乡重夫(SMED/防错)、Eliyahu Goldratt(TOC 创立者)、W. Edwards Deming(变异与系统观)、James Womack & Daniel Jones(把 TPS 译成西方可学的『精益』)、Jeffrey Liker(丰田模式学术化)、Mike Rother(VSM 与改善型)、Wallace Hopp & Mark Spearman(工厂物理学)、Hau Lee(斯坦福,牛鞭效应与 Triple-A 供应链)、Yossi Sheffi(MIT,韧性)、Carol Ptak & Chad Smith(DDMRP)、David Simchi-Levi(MIT,风险敞口指数)、Steven Spear(TPS 的 DNA)、以及中文圈的供应链实务作者(刘宝红等); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — JIT 是不是 2021 全球断链的元凶(精益派反驳:崩的是单一来源+砍库存不砍变异的『假精益』);西方学精益的高失败率(只搬工具不搬思维,精益在很多工厂沦为裁员的代号);六西格玛黑带官僚化与扼杀创新之争;TOC 派与精益派互相攻击(Goldratt 讽刺精益是等浪费自己浮现);预测无用论(需求驱动派说预测必然错、要靠缓冲吸收)vs 统计预测派;控制塔/数字孪生/AI 预测的过度承诺与高项目失败率;中国制造的年降与内卷式压价 vs 供应商共生;近岸·友岸外包是真实产能转移还是政治叙事; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **精益/TPS 派(丰田血统:大野-新乡→Womack/Jones/Liker/Rother,信全局消除浪费与人的改善能力)** vs **约束理论 TOC 派(Goldratt:系统产出只由瓶颈决定,聚焦五步、DBR、缓冲管理)** vs **统计质量/六西格玛派(Deming-Juran-Shewhart→GE/Motorola,信减少变异与过程能力)** vs **运营科学/工厂物理学派(Hopp & Spearman:用排队论与数学定律解释,认为精益与 TOC 都是特例)** vs **需求驱动/DDMRP 派(Ptak & Smith:预测不可靠,靠战略解耦缓冲)** vs **韧性/风险派(Sheffi、Simchi-Levi:效率之外必须为断链设计)**。不含: 跨境电商卖家的发货与头程物流(已由 cross-border-ecommerce 覆盖)、纯采购的商务谈判技巧、企业级 ERP 的代码实施与二次开发、通用项目管理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding, organizing, registering, or loading non-code files (images, audio, video) in a Pixi'VN project — local assets processed by PixiJS AssetPack vs. online/remote-hosted assets, the AssetsManifest/bundle/alias system, where to edit the manifest for each case, and when to load bundles (at startup, in the background, per-label, per-route). Load this before writing any code that references an image/sound/video path directly, or before adding entries to a manifest.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure compelling design presentations for stakeholders, reviews, and showcases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create developer handoff specifications with measurements, behaviors, assets, and edge cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is /pushback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when options, a recommendation, or an already-chosen approach are on the table and the reasoning under them has not been independently checked — especially when the case rests on cited documentation, remembered behavior, or premises nobody verified. Not for generating alternatives, and not for critiquing a spec, which is the pushback skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate unit tests for untested branches and edge cases. Use when coverage is low, CI flags gaps, or a release needs hardening. Not for integration/E2E suites, framework migrations, or fixing production bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional SVG logos from project context: 7 brand variants plus a showcase HTML page. Use for product marks, wordmarks, icons, and favicons. Don't use for raster-only logos, illustrations, or full brand guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede AI CI and branch-protection wiring for any repo and any stack: path-aware jobs, a single aggregator required check that cannot deadlock, lockfile hygiene, runtime pinning from the repo, and the exact branch-protection settings. Use when asked to set up CI, protect main, make CI block a bad merge, fix a required check that hangs pending forever, or repair duplicate or misfiring pipelines. Detects the repo's real apps, package managers, and runtime versions first; emits workflow files and settings, never pushes or flips protection itself. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the change the gate is failing on (use suede-code); designing the AI eval cases to wire in (use suede-ai-eval); branch and worktree hygiene (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for Rust testing in Axone CosmWasm contracts. Use when adding unit tests, integration tests, data-driven cases, or coverage-oriented test scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform QA testing on running web applications using cmux_browser. Covers functional testing, accessibility auditing, edge case testing, and structured reporting with evidence. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User says "test this", "QA this", "QA this PR", "check the app" - User says "run QA", "verify the build", "test the UI" - User asks to "check if it works", "validate the feature" - User says "acceptance testing", "smoke test", "regression test" - User asks to "find bugs", "test for bugs", "break it" - User wants to "check accessibility", "run axe", "a11y audit" **Covers:** Any web application accessible via HTTP. Uses cmux_browser (Playwright under the hood) for all browser interactions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Neo4j Graph Data Science (GDS) embedded plugin via Python client or Cypher — covers graphdatascience client 2.x, GraphDataScience, gds.graph.project.native, gds.graph.project.cypher, snake_case endpoints, graph catalog operations, stream/stats/mutate/write modes, memory estimation, PageRank, Louvain, WCC, FastRP, KNN, Node Similarity, ML pipelines, and cleanup. Use for Aura Pro, self-managed, local, or offline Neo4j DBMS with the GDS plugin installed. Does NOT cover Aura Graph Analytics GDS Sessions, AuraGraphDataScience, GdsSessions, gds.graph.project.remote, or AuraDB Cypher API projection/session management — use neo4j-aura-graph-analytics-skill. Does NOT handle Cypher authoring — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT cover driver setup — use neo4j-driver-python-skill or other driver skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a candidate finding falls into a noisy category - the do-not-report list, the precedents that settle recurring edge cases, and the narrow exceptions where an excluded category still counts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a case needs data, a user/role, or a third-party dependency - seeding through the product first, test credentials, namespacing on shared environments, and stubbing an external HTTP service by hand
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after the targeted cases pass - choosing the adjacent behaviour this change can break from the PR's files and the component's links, and the per-repository smoke set
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the task has a background job, queue consumer, scheduler or webhook - firing the real trigger, polling for the side effect, and the retry, idempotency and poison-message cases
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any review_criterion approval or column move - the evidence each verdict needs, how to treat skipped, blocked and intermittent cases, and which exit a blocker takes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。